I went slackware to debian and am now at ubuntu. Give me a reason to waste my time with any of the others and I might. It wont be arch though. If want something like arch I might as well go back to slackware.

I’ve fallen down the rabbit hole of a lot of Debian based distro’s. But I eventually settled on Ubuntu for my desktops and Debian stable for my servers. Because I like some mainstream support and also like to follow the KISS principle.

Ok this describes me annoyingly well. Ubuntu, then Manjaro, then Arch, and now Gentoo. Now I don’t really want to go any further because I quite like this distro :p

Ahhh. Put NixOS and VoidLinux at the end

Not a single comment about Kali that I can pick a fight with?? So disappointed rn

Yes, I fall everywhere on the knowledge spectrum. It just depends on which niche area I’m fixating on that day.

Full circle, back to Mint

Went from Ubuntu, Mint, Manjaro, Garuda, Kubuntu, Bazzite, now CachyOS. Cachy has been wonderful for all my needs

Garuda has - apart from their theming - a pretty decent setup

I still use Kubuntu, btw.

I’m gonna put this out there: If you can do Endeavour or Manjaro, you can do Arch, and Arch is in no way less stable than Tumbleweed. All you need to do is to pick btrfs and enable snapshots and then never use them.

Nice corporate ad…

I would rather “despair” with a community based distro than using capitalistware were that graph true, however my Arch machine works perfectly fine and have no need to do so. On the other hand corporate distros…

Plateau of Sustainability.

Started on Storm Linux, went to Slackware, and then Ubuntu. Did my time in the Arch Valley of Despair, along with a little Manjaro. Even tried Debian for a bit. Went openSUSE for a few years and then moved to Fedora last year and stuck there since.

I know nothing, and I’m keeping it that way

My system of choice is Mint, btw

My guess before reading the comments:

“Everyone hated that.”