• MintyFresh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      6 days ago

      But then a couple dozen bros can’t hoard wealth and power. It’s like you don’t even care about the capitalists. Bruh

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Those giant solar arrays where they focus all the energy up at one tower would be badass to blow up.

        Don’t do it, we desperately need more of those, but I imagine it would be sparkly.

    • sga@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      sadly, no - you still need high quality silica, and advanced facilities to manufacture the photovoltaics. Imagine it like you buying coal and using coal to power your house. yes this coal is cleaner, and runs for 10-20 years, but there are not many coal plants.

      • Zachariah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        all power sources have the same problem of centralized sources of materials and manufacturing, so it doesn’t make solar any worse than the others

        but the other energy sources have the problem of centralization once they’re implemented

        • sga@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          this may seem stupid/naive, but geothermal does not have any such problem. it is effectively a ac (heat pump). Nuclear too does not require complex manufacturing. it still requires mining, but so do almost all electrical solutions too. but beyond that, they are just rocks that pretty much perpetually dissipiate heat. if you go for betavoltaics, they directly give electrons, and can charge stuff.