cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/36304935
[about f—ing time!]
Joseph Gedeon in Washington
Wed 17 Sep 2025 18.18 EDT“We, as Americans, must end our complicity in the slaughter of the Palestinian people,” he wrote. “Having named it a genocide, we must use every ounce of our leverage to demand an immediate ceasefire, a massive surge of humanitarian aid facilitated by the UN, and initial steps to provide Palestinians with a state of their own.”
He now joins a small but growing list of House members including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib and Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene, as well as Vermont representative Becca Balint, who also called it a genocide earlier in the day.
“Today, I believe the Israeli government is committing a genocide against the Palestinian people,” Balint wrote in an op-ed in the Courier. “As the granddaughter of a man murdered in the Holocaust, it is not easy for me to say that.”
A couple politicians calling it genocide doesn’t have any legal implications. Warren did it already and nothing changed in the legal implications, nor would they kick in if 3 (4 now) were doing it instead.
Your link doesn’t say that Warren called it a genocide, but that “she thinks it will legally be defined as a genocide”. That’s not calling it a genocide, that’s thinking it will be called that. There is a difference there
But you need to think of it from a political lens moreso than one politician saying it meaning it will immediately have legal consequences
If a majority of politicians say “it’s ethnic cleansing”, things will happen that are not meaningfully different than a majority saying “it’s genocide”. That’s the hurdle, not whether two senators who are on the right side of the issue (albeit after far too long) are using specific terminology.