Anything but cracking down on uninhabited dwellings.
Please bro, just give a few more public resources to private for profit groups, the market’s just about to solve all of our problems, we just need to give them a little more, please bro please /s
This is hopefully going to be great, preventing the NIMBY’s from stopping higher-density housing focused near public transit. I am in a Sacramento suburb and there’s huge empty lots right near the bus lines near the freeway; if those can become high-density housing for people that can have less reliance on cars, it’d be huge for this area. Even a small % nudge would be beneficial.
I don’t understand the logic:
IF residences exist ( according to concentration-of-wealth-archy ) solely to extort as much wealth from the population as possible, & that is maximized when a significant-fraction of the population is homeless,
THEN … manufacturing more housing just means that the institutional residence-possessors have to possess more residences, in order to keep enough of the population homeless for maximal-exploitation & maximal-institutional-profit?
Other people, of course, would crack down on psychopathic pseudopersons owning residences and reduce homelessness that way, but that’s as “unamerican” as Jesus getting violent on the temple moneychangers, isn’t it?
He’s intentionally “not understanding” or someting?
shrug
_ /\ _
If it isn’t public housing, or at the very least rent controlled private developments, it’s just going to increase the number of unaffordable apartments on the market
Hating on gruesome Newsom is fun but zoning laws are a huge problem that impede more than just housing supply - like public transit become higher value if you can zone multifamily units near town centers and business centers.
But also, increasing the supply is a good way to decrease pressure on the market. There is no reason to let the perfect be the enemy of the good…especially if massive national public works projects to increase housing for poor and working class families is off the table for at least the next 3 years and 3 months.
increasing the supply is a good way to decrease pressure on the market
Bullshit, real estate developers and finance institutions have sucked up enough of our wealth at this pont that normal supply and demand stuff doesn’t work, they just ride off of loans collateralized by properties that have nonsense sky-high valuations even though most of their units are empty, until reality finally catches up and the bubble burst and then we have to bail them out because they’re too big to fail
We need more housing, but if it isn’t completely publicly owned housing or locked down with rent controls we’re just going to be demolishing neighborhoods to build more luxury bullshit real people won’t be able to afford and enriching douchebag landlords and land developers who are going to pump their wealth into fascist political movements
Supply and demand are not 100% representative of market realities due to externalities, as you say. But there is a market and that market is responsive on some level (even sublinearly) to supply and demand. This is not a solution to the problem but it is a step in the right direction. Where do you want public housing to be built, next to rail lines or in the middle of nowhere? This legislation makes it possible to build public housing near rail lines by getting rid of zoning laws that previously prohibited it. Take the small wins where you can.
You see a dark cloud in this silver lining. You dont have to. Doomerism doesnt motivate action, it dissuades it.
No more single family zoning. All Single family lots can be multi family lots.
