• Saymaz@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 hours ago

      “Both are true.”

      Motherfucker, did you even see the source of that claim against communism? It comes from a book that counted people who died under British and other European colonialism, the Third Reich soldiers who died in ww2, UN and NATO bombings ordered by the USA, and every war casualty in 20th century wars.

      Why are you people so allergic to reading books?

    • Saymaz@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Yeah, buddy. I agree with you.

      (I am also severely historically illiterate.)

    • Oppopity@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The death toll from communism comes from the black book of communism which was written by a staunch anti-communist who seeked out to prove communism killed 100 million people which is why it includes nazi deaths and people who weren’t even born as victims of communism.

      • infinitevalence@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Because it intentionally neglects the harm caused by the Great Leap Forward, or various soviet famines. The statement is designed to deflect attention and responsibility from A to B and use hyperbole to create outrage.

        Its possible to argue that both China and the Soviet Union were not actually communism but rather authoritarianism but for the sake of common understanding we will refer to them as they refer(ed) to themselves.

        So did millions of people die because of “communism?” the facts say yes. So do millions of people die because of Capitalism? the facts say yes.

        Both are true statements, and using hyperbole and outrage to deflect or minimize one or the other is in bad faith.

        • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          59 minutes ago

          This is pure projection. The meme doesn’t ‘neglect’ anything.

          The statement is designed to deflect attention and responsibility from A to B and use hyperbole to create outrage.

          Your objection is essentially that you want to label something as ‘bad’ but not allow the necessary discussion of ‘relative to what?’

          Your system deliberately murders an order of magnitude more people but we’re not allowed to talk about it because you say so and we all give a huge shit what you have to say because you’re so well read on the subject lol

          • infinitevalence@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            53 minutes ago

            We are talking about it, and its not my system its the one I am trapped in, and I still would not want to live in either Russia or China.

            I also dont want to live in the US, I want the Star Trek future now, all people have value.

            • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              32 minutes ago

              kinda don’t give a shit what you have to say in response to my criticism when you aren’t going to respond to the criticism at all

              you can claim to love all good things and hate all bad things

              literally zero bearing on what you said or what I said in response