Anyone else getting these donation ads? Was it just shoved onto an update by the Lemmy devs, or is this coming from the instance admins? It doesn’t seem to show on clean browser sessions to lemmy.ca

  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    What app do you use with it?

    What got me hooked on lemmy was wefwef/voyager which is basically a reddit Apollo clone.

        • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Now compare it to every other implementation of the modlog.

          It actually has filters now because of an update last month, but it’s still not readily accessible if you don’t know the URL while most implementations provide links to it, from the home page and filtered within each community page. Even if it gets addressed, it shows that the priorities lie more on the side of creating a Reddit clone than allowing essential access to transparency.

            • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              but it’s still not readily accessible

              Now show the part where you had to scroll down the whole feed to get to it instead of it being on the sidebar. This is what dark patterns in GUI design are criticized for. I suspect that the devs have the same attitude as yours, it’s tacked on somewhere so it has already been handled. That’s the point, it’s not a priority.

              • Blaze (he/him)@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                With that logic the /instances page on Lemmy is also hidden as a dark pattern to prevent people from looking up an instance’s federation list

                There is no instance sidebar on Piefed on the homepage, if someone wants to see the instance stats that person would have to go to the “About” page that is also at the bottom. That’s not a dark pattern, just a design decision.

                • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.caOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Not really, why do you think whataboutism is a valid form of argument? Dark patterns are essentially bad design decisions. If you can say the same about how Lemmy handles it instances page, then one bad design decision doesn’t cancel out another, it can be improved as well.

                  Like Mbin. Which is supposed to be the context of this subthread.

                  • Blaze (he/him)@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Mbin also only links to the federation page at the very bottom of the homepage, does this mean that Mbin uses a dark pattern to prevent users from accessing that page?

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m curious, as someone who’s mostly only looked from the outside, what “slants too much on the moderator side” means.

        • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          I’m referring to transparency features being like seeing who’s downvoting and upvoting comments or easy and relevant access to the modlog and comments getting removed. Piefed little effort to making the modlog transparent and hides upvoting and downvoting completely (they basically had to make up a new concern for it, “voting privacy”, but its an excuse that allows for the manipulation of the voting system and lack of accountability for already pseudonymous accounts) while also implementing a reputation system that is asking to be gamed. It puts more responsibility and power onto mods, admins, and devs, and it’s the second one that’s going to be more frequently exercised over conversations.

          Basically, does it allow users to police themselves and the content they want to see, or does it give it to the people behind the curtains?

          • Blaze (he/him)@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            they basically had to make up a new concern for it, “voting privacy”, but its an excuse that allows for the manipulation of the voting system and lack of accountability for already pseudonymous accounts

            The “private voting” system has been removed months ago. Nowadays Piefed user can either decide to federate their votes (which can then been seen by lemvotes or other tools) or keep them local

            • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Doesn’t matter, the philosophy is still there. I will never expect them to be as transparent as Mbin, who provides voting transparency thus proving that the whole concept of voting privacy is bust and a power play. There is no epidemic of people abusing voting transparency that the “voting privacy” advocates might have argued, never mind that it is also false sense of security when it is completely visible to the server instance admins.

                • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.caOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  So by your logic, just because they don’t provide all available forms of transparency means they don’t provide any? You are just searching for a “gotcha” when it isn’t even a counterpoint.

                  As to why,

                  If Mbin cannot support this then private communities need to block Mbin instances completely.

                  That particular exception exists, it doesn’t take too much effort to find out why: https://github.com/MbinOrg/mbin/issues/1115 Among other things, Mbin was threatened to be blocked by Lemmy on default for part of its functionality by the Lemmy devs, and melroy decided to succumb to the pressure rather than split the fediverse on this issue. Honestly, I find the main Lemmy devs to be compromised given how much they want narratives to head in a particular political direction and the tool that lack of transparency on downvotes provides for that in regards to shaping visibility and discussion within threads. It wasn’t like that for a long time, but you knew that.

                  • Blaze (he/him)@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    So by your logic, just because they don’t provide all available forms of transparency means they don’t provide any? You are just searching for a “gotcha” when it isn’t even a counterpoint.

                    I didn’t say they don’t provide any, I said that their transparency isn’t complete.

                    If someone wants to have full votes transparency nowadays, using a Lemmy instance that federates lemvotes provides transparency on both up and downvotes, while Mbin only gives upvotes.

                    Not sure if Mbin support lemvotes, but even if it does, then it’s similar to Lemmy: you have to use lemvotes to have full transparency

              • Skavau@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Piefed’s level of voting transparency is little different to Lemmys now, except for Piefed defederating from lemvotes. I was also present during the discussions about it - and Rimu was very open about why he initially didn’t like public voting. He changed it because of public pressure to do so. That’s not an absence of transparency.

                In any case, even if piefed.social is poor for this. That wouldn’t mean that piefed.zip or piefed.ca would have to follow the same instance policies.

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            seeing who’s downvoting and upvoting comments

            Lemmy doesn’t give you this either, though? (Unless you use a service like lemvotes, which I think does it by having admin access.) So how is it different?

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Me? I don’t. I’m still on Lemmy because I haven’t quite managed to work up the energy for the switch, and I’m rather tied to this account.

      I believe some Lemmy apps have added additional support for Piefed, but I don’t know which. Tbh I do most of my browsing on a computer in a web browser anyway.

      With a quick Google search, I found Mlem, Interstellar, and possibly Voyager already has support. But I can’t vouch for any of that personally.