cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/54239937

During the Great Depression, when banks foreclosed on farms, neighbors often showed up at the auctions together.

They’d bid only a few cents, and return the land to the family that lost it. Sometimes a noose hung nearby as a warning to outsiders not to profit from someone else’s ruin.

It was rough, but it worked, communities protected each other when the system wouldn’t.

If a collapse like that happened today, do you think people would still stand together or has that kind of solidarity disappeared? Could it happen again?

  • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    140
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Mod notice: This post is kinda in the grey area of being in breach of Rule 6, but it’s a good question with decent answers, so it gets to stay.

    Stay classy.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Let it stand! I see it as more of a question of how people would react to such a disaster in modern America.

      • neidu3@sh.itjust.worksM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Plus rule 6 is mostly there to prevent this board from being flooded with questions about whatever annoying orange did in the past 24h

      • thelittleblackbird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Not really, the great depression in capital letters was almost 100% in the US.

        The rest of the world had a recession, a bit tougher than normal but nothing near what happen in the US

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 hours ago

            That mostly has to do with the end of WWI and the reparations they had to pay. It happened near the same time, but not really related.

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            A story my parents shared with me as a kid, allegedly from somewhere in family history was of an individual taking a wheelbarrow of cash to the store to buy a loaf of bread, heading inside and learning the price had further increased and upon returning outside finding the cash dumped in the street and the wheelbarrow gone since that was the (relative) valueble left unattended.

          • CybranM@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 hours ago

            That’s also partly because they printed a ton of money for reparations for losing the first world war

        • Nythos@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          The US Great Depression directly lead to hyperinflation in Weimar Germany which lead to the rise of National Socialism.

          Edit: I was wrong, the hyperinflation was 9 years prior and it was a 30% unemployment rate from the crash which was a leading factor to National Socialism, not hyperinflation.

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            47 minutes ago

            Part of that was linked to a great drought on US farms caused by overfarming leading to the dust bowl. That was a major part of the US GDP then. And 100 years later people still don’t believe humans can alter the environment.

            • DNS@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              31 minutes ago

              The US at the time deported Latino citizens due to the increases racism/bigotry. Most of them were farmhands who knew how to work the land, better than the white farmers. The US realized their mistake in the middle of the depression and attempted to woo the same people back under the Vaquero program. The promise of citizenship was never fulfilled by the US.

            • Nythos@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Seems I mixed up the unemployment from the depression with the hyperinflation of the Weimar Republic.

              I’ve edited my comment to say this

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Unequivocally no.

    We live in an era of being able to buy things, sight-unseen. In that era, there was no way for an investor to bid without physically showing up, so if they did, and aggressively outbid everyone else, then they already have a noose set up for them.

    Now? People don’t need to be at the auction in person, there probably wouldn’t be an auction to begin with. The Bank would hire a real estate agent, who would pass it off to whomever makes the highest bid. Simple as that.

    I’d like to think we would, as communities, as a society, but in this society is also money hungry, faceless corporations that will do whatever they can to make a dollar. There are so many layers of obfuscation between the person who is buying the property, and the person who ultimately owns it.

    I just can’t see it happening with the Internet.

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Society doesn’t exist anymore. Capitalism has atomized us all into individual crabs, clawing to get out of the pot, paying no heed to who we drag down in our struggles.

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        55 minutes ago

        I’m going to start using the “single crab alone, clawing in a bucket” analogy to describe our current world.

    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 minutes ago

      Yeah, the bloated police state and anonymity of most real estate moguls makes this logistically impossible. That being said, the reaction to the United Healthcare CEO’s killing and the number of ICE, “assaults,” that can’t get grand jury indictments makes me think this spirit is still alive.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      56 minutes ago

      I just can’t see it happening with the Internet.

      This, even without the technological forces of capital swooping in to take advantage of every leveraged opportunity, even if people did rally together it would just turn into a political/performative circus and the entire thing will get lost and buried under some streamer drama that erupts from it.

  • toppy@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Most likely no. People nowadays have no empathy. Don’t care about others. No unity.

  • Jhuskindle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    They are doing this in some areas. Little Tokyo in Los Angeles had a whole bunch of people buy out buildings so rent wouldn’t go up and they could subsidiZe some of the older standing businesses. Humans are still mostly good.

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    No, because farmers knew each other back then and it was a society transitioning from agrarian to fully industrial. Different values.

    They also had a connection to reality that we don’t have, they used their hands directly on physical objects, we all think we’re Johnny Mnemonic (ever see those stupid SAS vaiya or whatever ads?).

  • RedFrank24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Absolutely not, there’d be some TikTok influencer that would be like “Broooo you can get land so cheap!” and buy it all and sell it for massive profit.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        He likes views, he’d make the farmer do some stupid challenge to win back some portion of the land, selling off whatever the farmer couldn’t “win”

        • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I don’t really know what he does, except that he gives stuff to people. That’s the full content of my Mr Beast file. That and a mugshot.

          • nomy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Less “he gives people stuff” and more “he exploits peoples desperation for views.”

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I watched part of one video a few years ago because the title said something about crashing a train and I just wanted to see what kind of equipment they were destroying and how they managed safety. Instead my main takeaways were

            1. The videos have such insanely fast pacing I needed a proper break from the screen after skipping through a few minutes of it
            2. They had some guy spending shitloads of money to try to protect a pile of cash from a pile of explosives (and whatever cash he protected he got to keep), also dubious on safety but with the way they edited and of course basic knowledge of explosive safety (such as, everybody stay away from the explosives and don’t leave random explosives lying around in disorganized piles), I’m guessing the pile of explosives was entirely digital
            3. The train was in fact nothing special. Just some old equipment from the 80s that already have some examples in preservation. Also I’m guessing they weren’t aware that most American trains do not have much in the way of crumple zones due to FRA regulations because they really set it up for what would be an impressive crash for a car which is built with tons of crumple zones and instead the train got dented up as it bounced
  • theherk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Correct as all the negative comments may be, I really think we can’t know what shape it would take. Things change quickly when people get hungry. Only class consciousness can save us.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Hell, no. If the word went around that there was an auction, there will always be those who decide to buy their neighbors’ land.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Nope, “Gotta pull yourself up by your bootstraps”.

    The USA is no longer the USA because the core values of people who wear and live by the flag have changed. Sure, the core values of the people profiting off of them hasn’t changed, but they have made sure to twist the values of the rest of society for the last couple of decades or so.

  • PissingIntoTheWind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Absolutely not. Americans are now scumbags to each other. Especially after how they monetized homes and turned them into reality tv shows. About how the take an affordable home and make it unaffordable. Scumbag Americans will fuck each other over.

  • sobchak@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Not in the same way. There is still some anti-eviction resistance that goes on today. It’s rare and never successful in undoing evictions though. For the most part, I think the US is too individualistic, and the methods of preventing and breaking solidarity too refined for broad action to be successful. I imagine that during a depression, most desperate people would rather join the feds to feed their family by committing violence against others. Even now, ICE received 150k applications in a single week, and people aren’t anywhere near as desperate as they’d be in a depression. The government would have to basically collapse, and even then we’d probably end up more like the poor countries ruled by gangs and warlords that dangle the possibility of escaping poverty in exchange for extreme violence.

    Labor solidarity decreased under Hoover, and only started increasing under FDR with a lot of government support. I’m skeptical we’ll ever have free and fair elections again, so I don’t envision a pro-union government anytime soon.