• murmelade@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Yeah but it’s USA. Let’s wait and see how it plays out for the next 3 years or more. I don’t mind.

  • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Yes! I believe we should have snap elections if the budget doesn’t get passed. If you have 6 years or 6 months left, it doesn’t matter. We can do elections within 2 weeks. We don’t need 2 years for an election season. If the local community thinks their rep did nothing wrong, then they will be reelected. If not they will be replaced until a budget is passed.

    We need a way to replace people that aren’t working instead of just dealing with them for years. If you can’t do you job then you are fired, unless you have a close connection with your local. Then you could explain the situation.

  • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Its election day tomorrow, so after that they’ll magically come to an agreement in a few days.

    Yes, I agree. When people don’t do their job, they get fired. The people shouldn’t reelect a single one of those fuckers, but unfortunately people only vote for colors around here.

  • Nyxias@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    …This is where you draw the line as to what constitutes as a failed government? With all of the other reasons out in the open.

    • lemmy_acct_id_8647@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Nailed it. Maybe a nation who’s entire system of checks and balances that it beat off to for years can be toppled to fast and utterly doesn’t deserve to be rebuilt.

      The experiment is over folks. It’s been dead for a while. 2025 just opened some people’s eyes to it.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    the us is far to rigid for that, and neither side wants to give up power to have a new election or government/coalition. the gop and lesser extent the dnc fights tooth and nail to prevent expanding both houses SEATS, and the scotus, smaller groups are easier to control and manipulate than a really large HOUSE, or senate.

  • DaMummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    You’re so close to realizing that you don’t have a government that represents you, or it’s citizens in general. It’s not a bug, it’s a feature.

  • First_Thunder@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Depends on the consequences of failing to pass a budget. If you just keep using last year’s, it’s fine.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Disagree, but only because I think there should be non-negotiable items in the budget, including paying your workforce.