Handing online servers over to consumers could carry commercial or legal risks, she said, in addition to safety concerns due to the removal of official company moderation.

  • bluGill@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    If you don’t want to give the sever away (including the ability to use it) then don’t shut it down or otherwise make the game unplayable.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      So if the developers of a game go bankrupt, or a single developer of an indie game dies, what do you suggest happens?

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        usually in bankruptcy the game gets sold in order to help pay debts… whoever buys the game assumes the responsibility of contributing to run the online services, or provide options for others to… in the case that nobody buys the game (im not entirely sure what happens to the IP in that case) but it’s relatively minimal effort to release server source code or documentation OR even just remove the online parts that’s usually just for DRM which is now pretty irrelevant because you’re shutting it down anyway so why would anyone care if someone pirates it?!

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          None of that is “relatively minimal effort” other than releasing the source code, which is not something that should ever be mandated.

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            mandatory minimum warranties are also not relatively minimal effort and yet we have laws that require those… most consumer protection standards aren’t minimal effort: that doesn’t mean we don’t make laws to ensure consumers get what they are expecting when they hand over money

            why shouldn’t handing over source code to a game that’s being shut down (and apparently that nobody finds any value in since it wasn’t even bought in bankruptcy auction) be mandated as a last resort?

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        The code should go into escrow when the first game is sold. This is standard practice in industry - you don’t buy something without assurance that if the company goes under you have options.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          This is standard practice in industry - you don’t buy something without assurance that if the company goes under you have options.

          Which industries is this standard in? I can’t think of any. If Samsung went bankrupt who is replacing your S25 Ultra?

          • scintilla@crust.piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I think they mean in like B2B. Like if you buy of piece of software x thousand times with y years of support it’s standard practice to have a contract that covers what happens if the company goes under while you still have years of support.