db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · edit-22 years agoThe Motion Picture Association will work with Congress to start blocking piracy sites in the USlockwww.engadget.comexternal-linkmessage-square135fedilinkarrow-up1352arrow-down16
arrow-up1346arrow-down1external-linkThe Motion Picture Association will work with Congress to start blocking piracy sites in the USlockwww.engadget.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · edit-22 years agomessage-square135fedilink
minus-squareMamaVomit [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up81arrow-down20·edit-22 years agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareMamaVomit [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up56arrow-down5·2 years agoWhy is this what we take from China, and not high speed rail (rhetorical)
minus-squareUnruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26arrow-down6·2 years ago“Our” firewall: fucked, if ever implemented. probably won’t ever be. “Great Firewall of China”: massively fucked, already implemented. Yours is a false equivalence. The only people suggesting it’s “good and just” are the MPA and other copyright trolls.
minus-squareBeamBrain [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31arrow-down5·2 years agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareWashedAnus [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24arrow-down5·2 years agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareTC_209 [he/him, pup/pup's]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 years agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareDengistDonnieDarko [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 years agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareanarchoilluminati [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down2·2 years agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareKoboldKomrade [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·2 years agoGo back to reddit nerd.
minus-squaremnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 years agoYep. Peak Hexbear moment
minus-squareArmok: God of Blood@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 years agoAnd of course, three more of them show up to dogpile the person responding
minus-squarePan_Ziemniak@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoAnd chime in with “but muh tiktok.” Anything to beat the horse that china > US.
minus-squareRobotToaster@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·edit-22 years agoWe’re gonna build a firewall, a big beautiful firewall.
minus-squareAatube@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down1·2 years agoThe GFW blocks a lot more than just illegal movie sites
minus-squareEmpricorn@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down5·2 years agoIsn’t that exactly what their point is?
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·2 years agoYes. Today piracy, tomorrow “subversive” content like unionization.
minus-squareShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 years agoIt may not be next President/Congress or the one after that. However there will be a President/Congress that decides to broaden the firewall to “protect us”.
minus-squareDoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-22 years agoRemember 45’s AG wanted to ban encryption?
minus-squareShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoNo, however I can imagine the reason why.
Removed by mod
Why is this what we take from China, and not high speed rail (rhetorical)
“Our” firewall: fucked, if ever implemented. probably won’t ever be.
“Great Firewall of China”: massively fucked, already implemented.
Yours is a false equivalence. The only people suggesting it’s “good and just” are the MPA and other copyright trolls.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Go back to reddit nerd.
Yep. Peak Hexbear moment
And of course, three more of them show up to dogpile the person responding
And chime in with “but muh tiktok.”
Anything to beat the horse that china > US.
Removed by mod
We’re gonna build a firewall, a big beautiful firewall.
The GFW blocks a lot more than just illegal movie sites
Isn’t that exactly what their point is?
Yes. Today piracy, tomorrow “subversive” content like unionization.
It may not be next President/Congress or the one after that. However there will be a President/Congress that decides to broaden the firewall to “protect us”.
Remember 45’s AG wanted to ban encryption?
No, however I can imagine the reason why.
I don’t get it