db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · edit-21 year agoThe Motion Picture Association will work with Congress to start blocking piracy sites in the USlockwww.engadget.comexternal-linkmessage-square135fedilinkarrow-up1352arrow-down16
arrow-up1346arrow-down1external-linkThe Motion Picture Association will work with Congress to start blocking piracy sites in the USlockwww.engadget.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square135fedilink
minus-squareMamaVomit [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up81arrow-down20·edit-21 year agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareMamaVomit [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up56arrow-down5·1 year agoWhy is this what we take from China, and not high speed rail (rhetorical)
minus-squareUnruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26arrow-down6·1 year ago“Our” firewall: fucked, if ever implemented. probably won’t ever be. “Great Firewall of China”: massively fucked, already implemented. Yours is a false equivalence. The only people suggesting it’s “good and just” are the MPA and other copyright trolls.
minus-squareBeamBrain [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31arrow-down5·1 year agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareWashedAnus [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24arrow-down5·1 year agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareTC_209 [he/him, pup/pup's]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 year agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareDengistDonnieDarko [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareanarchoilluminati [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down2·1 year agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareKoboldKomrade [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·1 year agoGo back to reddit nerd.
minus-squaremnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 year agoYep. Peak Hexbear moment
minus-squareArmok: God of Blood@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoAnd of course, three more of them show up to dogpile the person responding
minus-squarePan_Ziemniak@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoAnd chime in with “but muh tiktok.” Anything to beat the horse that china > US.
minus-squareRobotToaster@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·edit-21 year agoWe’re gonna build a firewall, a big beautiful firewall.
minus-squareAatube@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down1·1 year agoThe GFW blocks a lot more than just illegal movie sites
minus-squareEmpricorn@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down5·1 year agoIsn’t that exactly what their point is?
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·1 year agoYes. Today piracy, tomorrow “subversive” content like unionization.
minus-squareShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoIt may not be next President/Congress or the one after that. However there will be a President/Congress that decides to broaden the firewall to “protect us”.
minus-squareDoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.comcakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-21 year agoRemember 45’s AG wanted to ban encryption?
minus-squareShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoNo, however I can imagine the reason why.
Removed by mod
Why is this what we take from China, and not high speed rail (rhetorical)
“Our” firewall: fucked, if ever implemented. probably won’t ever be.
“Great Firewall of China”: massively fucked, already implemented.
Yours is a false equivalence. The only people suggesting it’s “good and just” are the MPA and other copyright trolls.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Go back to reddit nerd.
Yep. Peak Hexbear moment
And of course, three more of them show up to dogpile the person responding
And chime in with “but muh tiktok.”
Anything to beat the horse that china > US.
Removed by mod
We’re gonna build a firewall, a big beautiful firewall.
The GFW blocks a lot more than just illegal movie sites
Isn’t that exactly what their point is?
Yes. Today piracy, tomorrow “subversive” content like unionization.
It may not be next President/Congress or the one after that. However there will be a President/Congress that decides to broaden the firewall to “protect us”.
Remember 45’s AG wanted to ban encryption?
No, however I can imagine the reason why.
I don’t get it