So? (implied: “I dun unrurrstand u’re point”)

I’m highlighting that the other user is missing the bloody point of the complain.

People want less plastic waste, sure. And yes, less consumption is a way to achieve so - no shit Sherlock “riodoro” Holmes. However, in this specific case the design solution was done so poorly that it inconveniences the user by a lot, and it isn’t even reducing (first R) the amount of plastic being used, it’s just in the hopes that people actually recycle (third R) that small piece of junk there.

Is this clear now?