• NTSync coming in Kernel 6.11 for better Wine/Proton game performance and porting.
  • Wine-Wayland last 4/5 parts left to be merged before end of 2024
  • Wayland HDR/Game color protocol will be finished before end of 2024
  • Nvidia 555/560 will be out for a perfect no stutter Nvidia performance
  • KDE/Gnome reaching stability and usability with NO FKN ADS
  • VR being usable
  • More Wine development and more Games being ported
  • Better LibreOffice/Word compatibility
  • Windows 10 coming to EOL
  • Improved Linux simplicity and support
  • Web-native apps (Including Msft Office and Adobe)
  • .Net cross platform (in VSCode or Jetbrains Rider)

What else am I missing?

  • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    What else am I missing?

    The fact that 90% of people don’t give a shit about ads, privacy or their operating system in general. They want a machine to open a browser, that’s it. If Windows comes pre-installed, they’ll use Windows.

    The only realistic chance we’ve got is that MS shoots itself in the foot once more by all that Recall crap and businesses drop Windows. But that’s a long shot.

    • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Business versions of Windows either won’t have recall or the domain controllers will be able to enforce a rule against it.

    • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Businesses that already use Windows with all of the heavily integrated business-related stuff from Microsoft (AD, Exchange, SharePoint, Teams, Outlook, etc.) won’t change that just because a feature that most likely can be disabled via GPO.

    • sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I find most people don’t know of the alternatives but they are open to change as they are unhappy with current options that they are aware of. I’ve talked with a few people that were surprisingly open to to trying Linux. They didn’t know how easy it is to use and install but jumped on the opportunity as they were unhappy with Windows.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Until something breaks, or doesn’t have a GUI. The average user seeing a terminal means they will abandon it. And even if they are willing to handle a terminal to fix an issue, the toxic community members that flock to be the first to respond condescendingly to new users will turn them away permanently.

        Linux communities have some of the most helpful users, but they also have people worse than a League of Legends game. And all it takes is one of them to turn the average person away forever.

      • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Changing to Linux means, people…:

        • need to have an understanding of operating systems, so they can think about alternatives
        • need to be aware of the actual alternative
        • need to be willing to learn something new
        • need to be willing to leave some applications or games behind
        • need to choose a Linux distribution
        • need the technical ability and understanding to actually download, flash and boot from boot system, install it and setup initial, such as root password and such

        These are basic and trivial stuff for us, but most normies don’t have this understanding and interest to go this far. And then it depends if they are happy and stay. Even if every PC manufacturer and distributor would offere the same PC with Windows and Linux, most would just choose Windows (probably). This is the current reality.

        • Jesus_666@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Mostly yes but there’s one other option that simplifies the whole thing: Chromebooks. They’re actually pretty decent for someone who doesn’t need much beyond a browser, a mail client, and a basic office suite.

          Sure, they’re tied to Google with all that entails but they can be a real option for someone like a senior who relies on relatives for tech support.

        • overload@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Such a hard agree. My wife won’t even let me install Linux, which takes out the more technical aspects of the above.

          She’s just comfortable on Windows. Most people don’t want to learn something new and even fewer actually care about privacy.

          Edit: Us Linux users assume that if Windows gets bad enough people will switch to Linux, when we all should face facts that normies will much sooner switch to Mac.

            • overload@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, for the mac pro line with specs that us nerds care about.

              I think some of those M1 mac airs are really affordable now though. For casual use it would be a good device for a tech illiterate person.

              • realbadat@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Or a mini.

                I have an M2 mini I use for iOS builds, cheap enough for me to buy and stick in the rack to use for remote builds. I got that a year ago for $600ish iirc.

                • overload@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah man. Apple still screws people when it comes to ram and storage options of course, but the base products are actually pretty good for the money.

        • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Something I’ve never checked for but…are there any linux installers that run from within windows? Shrink the windows partition, create a linux partition, populate it, install grub, and tell the user to reboot and choose linux? I think general lack of good ext4 fs support in windows might make things difficult, but you don’t actually need to do that part from within windows. There could be a second installer that’s triggered the first time they boot from grub.

          I feel like a well supported installer like that would dramatically lower the barrier to entry. It could make dual booting windows a breeze for anyone who knows how to run an installer and reboot, which is what people actually want.

          • swab148@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Q4OS has an installer like that, but you have to change the boot order after installation, I don’t think it uses grub.

          • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            This sounds awesome idea. Not sure if there is a technical reason why this could not be done. On the other hand, Windows already has WSL (Windows Subsystem for Linux, is it still called like that?). All antivirus programs would probably go nuts. Windows itself is a restricted system and some things need to be done before booting into Windows. I assume if it was possible, then this would have been done before. At least I never heard about this. The best way is to have a preinstalled Linux on hardware.

      • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        … And then something happens and they want you to install Windows again.

        As much as I like Linux, compared to Windows and Mac OS it’s high maintenance. Once in a while, things will bork themselves. And you need to have at least a rough understanding of what’s happening to fix it.

        Also (and that’s not a Linux problem per se) people seem to think if Windows breaks, MS or they themselves are at fault, if Linux breaks, that weird nerd and his hacker stuff are at fault.

        • Günther Unlustig 🍄@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have to disagree, at least in my experience.
          Windows causes more problems, both for my mum and myself.

          Her only purpose of a PC is basically to open a web browser, answer some mails and plug in a USB from time to time. For her, Mint never made one single problem, except when the hard drive failed.
          She really liked the “boringness” and the old Windows charme.

          And for me, Linux never made any big troubles in general. When I used Tumbleweed, there were a few papercuts (e.g. graphical glitches, program freezes, etc.) due to the bleeding edge, but nothing major.
          And since I use Fedora Atomic, I completely forget that I use an OS in general. I never have to update anything, I can’t break my stuff, etc…
          It’s the most “boring” and user friendly OS I’ve used, even more than MacOS and Windows. Only Android/ iOS are better in that regard.

          But I’ve never seen my OS just borking itself. If that should ever happen, I can easily roll back in a second and it will work again.

          And you need to have at least a rough understanding of what’s happening to fix it.

          If you can fix Windows (which made way more problems after updates for me) then fixing Linux is way easier. And if you’re an average person, then you go to a local repair shop and say “My PC broke” and they reinstall Windows for you.

          • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Without fail, every Linux installation I had destroyed itself after a while.

            Be it a full boot partition, some weird driver compatibility, etc, etc.

            My Windows installations (granted, all work laptops) never destroyed themselves. Yes, some bugs here and there, but it worked well enough for home usage. You can’t discount that.

            • 0x0@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Without fail, every Linux installation I had destroyed itself after a while.

              User-induced trauma, poor distros.

              • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                The fact those poor distros exist means yet another hurdle for the average user to switch to Linux

            • Thorned_Rose@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ve got the complete opposite to you. I’m in a household of 3 gaming desktops and 3 laptops, plus family who need help. I’ve been daily driving Linux for about a decade now and keep duel boot around just for Adobe products.

              On all these machines, Linux hs been rock solid and never had issues that wasn’t user caused. Windows on the other hand drives me crazy with how much it fucks out. I have next to no control over it. It updates when it wants. I have no control over what’s updated. I hate the gods damn ads (and that’s on Windows 10) despite running de-crappifying software. I hate how many errors it has and how long it takes t troubleshoot them. I hate that if the system borks itself enough, it’s faster and less insanity inducing to just reinstall the whole os than try and fix it. I hate that Windows just gets progressively slower and laggier over time whereas my 6 year running Arch install was as fast as the day I installed it.

            • Richard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Okay, but understand that from for example my point of view, your perception appears really skewed because my GNU/Linux installations have never “destroyed [themselves] after a while”. Respectfully, I think that you project your Linux failures unto the entire ecosystem, based on issues that were unique to you.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, but there are things that absolutely drove be crazy in Windows. When you switch to Korean, it would default to Latin characters, and you have to switch to Korean characters. Which is fine if you always use the Korean layout and just toggle between Latin and Korean characters, like most Koreans.

      But I am actually learning Korean and I speak more than one other language. When I switch to Chinese I expect it to type in Chinese. When I switch to Korean, I expect it to type in Korean.

      The most bullshit thing about Windows is if the default behavior doesn’t suit you, there’s no way to change it. You’re stuck with how Windows works because it’s batteries included.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s true. I only use applications. The OS is a thing in the background that needs to get setup fast so I click an application and now I’m using my computer. I spend more time in my BIOS than I do the back of my OS.

      Whichever OS does that best will always be the most popular.

    • Huschke@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      True.

      The only thing the average consumer will even notice is the end of support for Windows 10. However, once the prompt to upgrade to Windows 11 appears, 99% will click “yes” and forget about it. They might be a little annoyed by the changes, but that will be all.

      • pbjamm@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        However, once the prompt to upgrade to Windows 11 appears, 99% will click “yes” and

        be informed that their computer does not support Win11

        and forget about it.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nobody will notice end of support for Windows 10. Why would they? Nobody noticed end of support for Windows 7, either, and it’s still up and running in many places where it really shouldn’t.

        End users don’t give a crap about security updates and as long as users don’t bump into a lack of third party driver they won’t even notice a difference. And yeah, like every other time they will eventually update to the current version once more practical issues crop up. 10 to 11 isn’t even close to the harshest upgrade path MS has deployed.

    • UNY0N@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s slowly changing though, as the enschittification of windows continues. They may not care to know about the details, but all of those points do fall under the “it just works” catagory. And they do care about that.

      • wahming@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree. However if you look through the other comments in here, you’ll see a LOT more examples of stuff that fall into the “it just doesn’t work” category instead. And most of them are a lot more obvious to casual / new users. Those would be the ones that really require priority if Linux is ever to become mainstream.

  • Bell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it’s going to take a Microsoft catastrophe, something that disables machines for at least a few days. I’m thinking maybe a buggy windows update.

  • slowbyrne@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    My personal definition of “the year of the Linux desktop” is when we hit a market share % that starts to convince companies to take Linux support seriously. I don’t think we’re that far off from that happening and if Microsoft keeps adding in these terrible “features” to windows, more people will move over. Is 2024 the year for that? Probably not but I wouldn’t be surprised if it happens before 2030.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      A friend brought up some Ubisoft game (that I’m not that interested in) that is exclusive to their launcher. I was 90% sure this was an indication there was no hope for Linux there. I googled it and they apparently had already promised they would be strongly supporting Linux. A shitty company like Ubisoft is supporting it. I think we’re very close.

      I’d be very curious to see the hours played on games by OS. The last data I saw of probable usage percent had Linux at 4%, but I’d bet a large number of Windows and Mac machines are mostly just web browser machines. I would suspect Linux users are more likely to be gamers as they’ve already shown more interest in technology.

      I don’t know what percent we need to be mainstream, but we’re on a good trgectory. If we can manage to hit 10% I doubt it could be overlooked anymore. Also, every person who swaps over is one more person who’s likely to push others to swap. It’s a slippery slope. We’ll get there.

      • governorkeagan@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d bet a large number of Windows and Mac machines are mostly just web browser machines

        Just getting these devices (libraries come to mind) to switch to some LTS distro would bump Linux market share quite a bit.

        • bazmatazable@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The actual % numbers are probably not that important. Software developers and hardware manufacturers are looking for a critical mass of users of their product. So if 20% of the world switch from Windows to Linux but they are the 20% that only use a web browser then why would the compatibility landscape change? Adobe are not going to do the hard work to support Linux just because schools and libraries switch to Linux. Even if every government mandates using Linux for government offices would Cricut suddenly support Linux?

    • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I stopped using Windows in the XP era. Later on I started working in a job that required me to have a Win8 laptop. 2 years later I reverted back to Linux once I stopped working there and had Win8/10 as a game OS. But my main “serious” usage was on Linux.

    • monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m a Mac guy and I have a PC for gaming. I just installed Mint on my PC and it has been working great for gaming. I probably won’t need Windows ever again.

      • Frank Ring@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most games work on Linux or with Steam Proton.

        But some games still don’t or has kernel level anti-cheat systems.

        I would just ignore those games.

  • GustavoM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nah, the average “just werks” user won’t leave Windows even if it took money out of its credit card.

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Download Ubuntu 24.04

    Instant error mesage on boot

    APT keyrings are wrong

    Need to add old 22.04 to lists to install packages

    No CUDAtools support for 24.04 yet

    Yeah nah.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t know how many time it should be said.

      If you want to go Linux, DO NOT GO FOR UBUNTU

      It was a solid choice 10 years ago, but now it’s a piece of headache.

      Go Manjaro/EndeavourOS if you need ease of use and relatively bleeding-edge experience. Check Fedora if you want peace of mind. Check Mint once your tools appear in latest mainstream Ubuntu. Do not go for actual Ubuntu.

  • ellynelly@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Any source regarding “VR being usable” on linux? The current development seems pretty stale and it doesn’t seem like that’s gonna change anytime soon, especially if you own any Oculus headsets that predates the quest. I do hope the rumors of valve making the deckard are true, but those are just rumors and should be taken with a grain of salt.

    • utopiah@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean… it just works? Since the Index is out it’s just been working basically. Not sure what else would be needed. Sure being able to use Quest headsets would be nice but unless Meta decides to open up, I don’t think it would happen. IMHO that’s a vendor problem, not the OS lacking support, sadly.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wait, if Steam VR works on Linux for Index are Quest HMDs not usable through Steam Link? Or does that still need the Oculus software installed? I’m not actually sure.

          • MudMan@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Quest Link yes, I was referring to the alternative Steam Link app that is available on Quest. That’s maintained by Valve (and honestly works better than the wireless version of Quest Link, IMO). I was wondering if that works as an alternative, but I wouldn’t be surprised if there are still dependencies for controller inputs and head tracking that need Oculus software installed to work on the server side.

      • ellynelly@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s definitely a vendor problem rather than an os problem. But it’s still a problem that the biggest manufacturer in the VR space has no support for Linux, hence i find it a bit farfetched to say VR is usable on Linux when the most popular hardware is not being supported by it’s vendor.

        Though there are community efforts like Monado that looks pretty promising!

        • utopiah@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean if the vendor specifically decides NOT to support Linux AND there are viable alternative that do, e.g Valve Index, that run IMHO some of the best content, i.e Half-life:Alyx, then IMHO popularity is indeed important but it does show it’s not an OS problem.

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      SteamVR 2.0 dropped a bit ago, though it didn’t do much for Linux users…

      But it does point to something still happening with VR over at Valve.

    • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Any source regarding “VR being usable” on linux?

      I use VR with my Index almost every week on Linux. Filled to the brim with minor issues but definitely useable.

      Still looking forward to a Deckard announcement, the Index is starting to show its age.

  • planish@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    KDE and Gnome haven’t been stable or usable for the past 20 years, but will become so this year for some reason?

  • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    There one glaring issue. Most people don’t really even know what an operating system is and some of the people I talk to think Linux is a manufacture.

    I literally bring up Linux to my friend when they are having trouble getting windows to work and they say I think I have a linux. They mean it’s a Lenovo but they seem pretty confused about the idea of installing a different OS on their machine. This isn’t just older people but 20 something year olds (about my age).

    It’s funny to me but I try to be patient and help them with their problems anyway.

  • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope you’re right. What I did was let my kids use Linux, whatever distro they wanted, and they have used Windows only at school. I think this is the way to do it, expose this growing generation to good software and keep them away from the enahitified ones, while explaining the importance and joy of privacy.

    If we all do that with our kids, the next generation will have less sheep following all the commercial crap out there.

    • governorkeagan@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m planning on doing the same thing. I only have Linux installed at home. If they really need Windows for something I could always spin up a VM.