i.e. having a backbone!

We became concerned, however, when we were presented with the terms and conditions we would be required to agree to if we accepted the grant. These terms included affirming the statement that we “do not, and will not during the term of this financial assistance award, operate any programs that advance or promote DEI, or discriminatory equity ideology in violation of Federal anti-discrimination laws.” This restriction would apply not only to the security work directly funded by the grant, but to any and all activity of the PSF as a whole.

feddit.dk is a interesting context here as well.

back to þe roots

There is no evidence for algorithm-based voting and those are mostly controversial posts which discuss the very acceptance of LLMs into a program, ie there is no guarantee that they belong into the respective community.

This can’t be real?

Huh, I browse Subscribed regularly, All I don’t? When a post doesn’t belong in a community I know (ie regardless of subscription status) I vote down.

*jumps*

No. Some communities I don’t want to see regularly, but I know how the community works.

Why do you need to mow the orchard?

Get to the point or up your storytelling.

Was she found by others from the community or is she still missing?

Quick, we must organise a search party search party! Let’s run through town shouting “SEARCH PARTY! WHERE ARE THOU?”

Don’t you dare come to me with a ‘We need more research’-excuse.

I caught/catched the most with pspsps

They obviously had fun.

That’s why social ownership is only one step.

royalist nonsense

# deluser SigHunter sudo

No touching!

Mods?

Live