lemmy.dudeami.win
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
silence7@slrpnk.net to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish ·
edit-2
1 month ago

Masked Thugs Kidnap Another Student Off the Street

www.splinter.com

external-link
message-square
46
fedilink
465
external-link

Masked Thugs Kidnap Another Student Off the Street

www.splinter.com

silence7@slrpnk.net to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish ·
edit-2
1 month ago
message-square
46
fedilink
Attention Required! | Cloudflare
www.splinter.com
external-link

  • ALQ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    1 month ago

    I wonder how many people wonder what their local laws are on the use of deadly force in defense of another. After all, someone not in uniform and not identifying themselves seems like they’re just a kidnapper.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      1 month ago

      Here in Oregon it’s pretty clear, YMMV:

      https://oregon.public.law/statutes/ors_161.219

      "a person is not justified in using deadly physical force upon another person unless the person reasonably believes that the other person is:

      (1) Committing or attempting to commit a felony involving the use or threatened imminent use of physical force against a person; or

      (2) Committing or attempting to commit a burglary in a dwelling; or

      (3) Using or about to use unlawful deadly physical force against a person. [1971 c.743 §23]"

      In the case of an attempted kidnapping and the officers fail to identify themselves as such, that would fall under (1):

      “Kidnapping in the first degree is a Class A felony.”

      https://oregon.public.law/statutes/ors_163.235

      “Kidnapping in the second degree is a Class B felony.”

      https://oregon.public.law/statutes/ors_163.225

      • arotrios@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        Thank you for the detail.

        Some additional context from Snopes as to why this is so important in Oregon especially:

        Conner O’Shea told journalists he started running when he saw mysterious, armed people wearing camouflage body armor jump out of an unmarked van as he was walking home from a protest in downtown Portland, Oregon, on July 15, 2020.

        But his friend, Mark Pettibone, 29, was unable to escape the group of people in military fatigues that was later identified as a team of federal law enforcement agents operating under a plan by U.S. President Donald Trump to quell demonstrations against police brutality and racism in cities nationwide.

        According to Pettibone’s account of the incident — which was later publicized widely in news outlets ranging from The New York Times to Fox News — the officers tossed him into the van and took him to a federal courthouse. There, he said, they held him in a cell for about 90 minutes without explaining for what crimes he was suspected, nor identifying themselves as law enforcement personnel.

        His alleged experience, as well as reports of viral videos purportedly depicting similar actions on behalf of federal agents in Portland (which we explain below), outraged critics of the Trump administration in July 2020 — including Oregon and Portland officials who said the federal officers and their militarized tactics were not welcome in Portland and violated the rights of citizens.

        Personal reports from a friend of mine on the front lines in Portland corroborate this tactic - the group she was with was followed home by one of the vans described above.

        Her mugshot (she had been in the system before) then appeared in a line-up banner of “Antifa Criminals” that started circulating around right-wing websites. As she’s trans, she ended up having to move and go underground because of the death threats.

        If you’re in any way part of a population that Trump is targeting, be ready to defend yourself. Remember that once you’re in the system, not only will the cops have your data, but it will be leaked to the alt-right thugs willing to do the dirty work the cops won’t.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Oh, it’s actually WORSE than that. Not only were undercover feds disappearing people from the streets of Portland, the acting guy in charge, “Chad Wolf” (not EVEN making that up) was never confirmed.

          The whole operation was illegal, top to bottom.

          https://www.npr.org/2020/07/17/892277592/federal-officers-use-unmarked-vehicles-to-grab-protesters-in-portland

          https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/senate-should-ask-chad-wolf-about-his-illegal-appointment

    • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 month ago

      Probably depends on if the state has a Good Samaritan law and how it is worded. A quick search found me an article written by a criminal defense attorney in Phoenix, AZ and AZ’s law makes “injecting” yourself into a dangerous situation illegal.

      Article

      • Yeather@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Same in Mass where the journalist was, she was also unable to acquire a firearm because of her residence status.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      They seemed to present badges when they approached her. Can someone correct me on this?

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 month ago

        Looking at the image on the article, it looks like tubby brownshirt has a badge hanging around his neck.

        Not that that actually means anything:

        https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07K71JM14

        Surely never gets into the hands of bad actors… oh, wait…

        https://katu.com/news/local/portland-police-arrest-felon-slumped-over-in-stolen-car-say-they-had-fake-police-badge-and-loaded-gun?photo=1

        https://www.cbsnews.com/news/man-with-fake-badge-and-ammunition-arrested-outside-capitol/

        https://abcnews.go.com/US/man-fake-fbi-badge-bb-gun-arrested-after/story?id=104936435

    • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The only people capable of doing anything about armed masked people illegally detaining random innocent people are other armed people, since most democrats and Lefties don’t own guns, you must rely on fascist white supremacists police officers or armed redneck Republicans.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 month ago

        You might be surprised about that…

        https://www.ncja.org/crimeandjusticenews/u-s-liberals-emerge-as-surprisingly-growing-group-of-gun-owners

        I’d also argue that if you’re a member of a minority group, it’s past time you consider arming yourselves.

        Women:
        https://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/5057508-women-gun-ownership-america/

        LGBTQ+:
        https://newsisout.com/2025/03/the-rise-of-lgbtq-gun-ownership-safety-politics-and-identity/30477/

        Black:
        https://www.npr.org/sections/pictureshow/2022/10/13/1126878376/christian-lee-captures-black-gun-ownership-in-armed-doesnt-mean-dangerous

        Hispanic:
        https://english.elpais.com/usa/2024-06-24/gun-purchases-soar-among-latinos-in-the-united-states.html

        • futatorius@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Also, it’s past time immigrants armed themselves, to protect themselves and their families.

        • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Thanks for the great info, but “growing group” does not mean it’s equivalent to the unbelievably overwhelming quantity of firearms Christian fascist Republicans own.

          It’s not surprising at all that vulnerable groups of people are buying guns, but go to any local range to see who’s training and see that very few non-republican minorities or women regularly train with them.

          If you buy a firearm and never train marksmanship you might as well hand over these fascists your guns.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            This is true and locally, the issue I face, is that way more ranges than I’m comfortable with require NRA membership and that’s simply a non-starter.

            There are options, the one I used most often is run by the county sheriff:

            https://www.clackamas.us/pstc

            It’s a decent range, but directly run by the cops and there are issues with the cops here having worked directly with the fascists:

            https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/disturbing-texts-between-oregon-police-far-right-group-prompts-investigation-n972161

            I did my AR training here, decent folks, but it’s kind of a hike now from where I’m at:

            https://www.threatdynamics.com/

            There’s one across the river in Washington State, the problem there being Oregon and Washington don’t have reciprocity on concealed carry, would be entirely too easy to accidentally get in trouble.

            https://www.englishpit.com/

            There’s a new one that’s been TRYING to open for 3 years now, LGBTQ+ friendly which is good, but I guess they’re having permit and construction issues. :( Gun shop is open, just not the range. They don’t even really have a website, just an Instagram. Feels rinky dink, but I’m hopeful!

            • SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              Get together with other like minded people, and create an LLC or co-op or whatever, pool you’re money, buy a chunk of land and make your own range.

              • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I mean, I’ve been watching the new one for 3 years now, they have a building, and it’s mostly open, but they still can’t get the range functional.

                I don’t know if it’s bad management, poor funding, or a lack of permitting or whatnot, but if they can’t pull it off with an actual operational business, it doesn’t give me much hope. :(

                • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  We’ll they’re trying to run a business and make a profit. You make a club and it’s a one time buyin for being able to co-own a piece of land. No one is profiting and so you don’t need to deal with all the red tape that comes with that.

            • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              If you have any federal land grants near you (often found in rural areas outside suburbs) you can shoot for free, into a berm.

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 3.76K users / day
  • 7.73K users / week
  • 13.8K users / month
  • 28.8K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 23.4K subscribers
  • 18.8K Posts
  • 433K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.8
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org