• jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    Again, admissable doesn’t enter into it. That’s something for the court to determine.

    It’s plain everyone believes Luigi killed the guy.

    This is Luigi:

    There is no question he killed the guy, the only question is justification.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Do you understand that the picture with the hood up is from earlier at a hostel?

      Your little collage is cropped, but isn’t Luigi wearing a completely different backpack in the one on the right than the shooter is in the middle.

      You can’t just throw a picture of the shooter in between two pics of Luigi and claim that proves something.

      Do you have any idea how many people have greenish coats in NYC any given morning?

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        And how many got caught with the gun and a hand-written manifesto? It’s plain Luigi plugged the guy, the only question is if it’s justified, that’s what the court will determine.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          And how many got caught with the gun and a hand-written manifesto?

          That doesn’t matter if it can’t be evidence…

          We’re just going in circles.

          You believe the cops because things the cops said…

          Most can’t do that anymore

          • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Again, we aren’t talking about what he’s found guilty of or not. We’re talking about if he shot the guy or not.

            Saying the evidence is inadmissable doesn’t discount the fact that it was the gun used and the manifesto shows motive.

            He DEFINITELY shot the guy. Whether he’s CONVICTED for it is a different issue.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              He DEFINITELY shot the guy

              Because he was seen wearing a greenish coat?

              Like, if you can acknowledge that the screenshot of his face and the video of the shooting are from two different videos and there’s not continuous footage between the two…

              Then I don’t understand why you keep saying it’s him.

              If you can’t, then I don’t think there’s anyway I can help you understand this.

              And I definitely don’t understand why you just want to keep repeating your opinion like it’s somehow a fact.