• Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I don’t care or think they didn’t track that, they don’t ruin my algorithm with those searches which is all I really care about.

    I basically just use it to look up whatever new crazy person my whack job mother was sending me some antivax propaganda from to confirm they’re the type of quack I assume them to be.

  • Nangijala@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Wait… people actually think that incognito means that they don’t record your searches??

    I thought everybody knew that all incognito does is preventing your searches from showing up in your search history.

    Did anyone actually think that these big tech companies would willingly give you an option to keep your searches private from them?

    Hello???

    Always assume that everything you do online is being recorded and seen by someone. Unless you’re a master computer wiz or whatever the fuck they call it these days, ALWAYS ASSUME YOUR ACTIVITY ONLINE IS PUBLIC.

    • quant@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      This is the consequence of wrapping everything in glossy plastics and dumbed down UI for decades. People don’t want to learn, and even if they do it’s all hidden away behind blobs and bloats.

  • Karl@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago

    So this is why the weird shite I look up in incognito comes up when I search something without incognito mode.

    • Googledotcom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Cmon if you use tor to search about cookie recipes then you are ill, Schizo

      Healthy people use tor to hire hitman on their boss after boss fired them, or a hacker to doxx the jerk that downvoted them

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    2 days ago

    Naming it incognito was a mistake. It was always clear to me all incognito is, is a non persistent container to keep your browsing data separate from your regular browsing data. All its hiding is your porn browsing habits from your mom. But of course, the name implies much more.

  • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    2 days ago

    Incognito mode was always just to hide your local browser history. Think Google would NOT track you?

    Do you have Google maps? They know where you are at all times.

    • Camelbeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      User visits Google (logged in)

      User visits Google, without cookies, but from the same IP, same user agent, same resolution, same OS, same enabled plugins, same browser version number, same fingerprint (based on al the previous information).

      Google, who could this possibly be???

    • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Do you have Google maps? ANY UNMODIFIED GOOGLE CODE OR ANDROID PHONE, TABLET OR CHROMEBOOK IN THE HISTORY OF FOREVER?

      Then they know where you are at all times. I bet the Pixel users get gold stars. Oneplus have little pluses and custom rom users have 👀.

  • SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    170
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Incognito was never about privacy. It’s about hiding your seach history from your parents or partner or whatever

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      2 days ago

      and i’m pretty sure the browsers have been quite explicit about this for a long time now, but of course no one bothers to read “This won’t change how data is collected by websites you visit and the services they use, including Google.”

      • seralth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s as far as I remember literally always said it’s basically just turning off local history, and not for true privacy. The wording has changed over the years and frankly only become more explicated and clear about that fact.

        This is a rare case of google NOT being the problem here. People are misusing a tool that has always been honest about itself.

  • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The Google Incognito tab in any browser clarifies that while it prevents your browsing history from being saved on your device, it does not make your browsing completely private.

    Websites you visit, your employer (if on a work network), and your internet service provider (ISP) can still track your online activity.

    Hell it even has a link that leads directly to the privacy policy

    https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/9845881?hl=en-GB

    The only thing that shocks me is that no one ever reads it

  • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    154
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I don’t believe for a second that they are actually going to delete any data they stole from users.

    • Godnroc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Of course they will! First you make a copy, then you delete the copy. Contractual terms satisfied.

    • monogram@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      The raw data might be purged but no one talks about the ML modal that google trained with that data.

    • seralth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      To be fair nothing was stolen, the lawyers even admitted as much.

      This is a user error problem caused by the moron in a hurry problem.

      The warning on incognito mode both before and after the change was very explicit that it was local only. It was intended for people sharing a computer, not for privacy to anything you searched, external websites, etc

      Below the warning even had examples over exactly what was and was not saved with it explicitly saying that external websites would be able to track and save your data including Google.

      The change was to add that warning list to the initial warning itself because Google had assumed people would read the entire page. They did not.

      Which means that those morons in a hurry who only skimmed misunderstood what incognito mode was for. Did not read the use case, the warning, the TOs, the manual, or any other information provided both explicitly or implicitly.

      Hell even parted the argument of the lawyers was that this is a user issue and that Google had a responsibility to prevent people who were ignorant or in a hurry from misunderstanding. And while they made a good faith effort, it could have been better. Google being the large company is taking the fall for this more than anything but it is at the end of the day a user issue.