• guillem@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    349
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago
    • Teetotalers: alcohol vegans.
    • Straight edgers: drug vegans.
    • Recycling: waste vegans.
    • Solar power: power vegans.

    The possibilities are infinite if you are a netaphor vegan.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    147
    ·
    24 days ago

    It’s quite common for me to be annoyed, angry, or upset at a headline writer. Then there’s the feeling I got reading “Meet the AI vegans.”

    Whole new level.

    • humble_boatsman@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      Its so wacky out there. When I read something like this I’m sure its The Onion. And its not. Then I read a headline about US politics and its totally believable , alas its The Onion.

    • Pudutr0n@feddit.cl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      You’d be surprised how much more serene your headspace can become if you stop expecting anything beyond stupidity, incompetence and negligence as the default human behavior.

  • normalexit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    Abstaining from a thing does not make one a vegan. That’s not how any of this works.

        • Tired@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          If the human you’re fucking consented, then consuming their fluids is vegan. Hell if they consent, eating them would be vegan too.

          Animals do not consent to having fluids extracted or their lives taken and flesh consumed. Animal agriculture keeps animals in filthy, torturous conditions too, which no animal would ever consent to either.

            • Tired@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              24 days ago

              It was kept in captivity by you though, which is not it’s natural habitat so any choices it made were, arguably, under duress.

              If you lived by a creek and regularly recognised a fish swimming by, and one day this fish killed itself in front of you- you still shouldn’t eat it as fish contain a lot of parasites and there’s very likely also something toxic in the water causing the fish to harm itself this way.

              But yeah, sure, hypothetically: if for a year or so you knew a wild fish that lived in an unpolluted and ecologically healthy body of water, and one day this fish chose to kill itself in front of you. You could, if you really wanted to eat a suicidal fish, eat the fish and say it was vegan because the only harm that came to the fish was through the un-coerced choices of said suicidal fish.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      24 days ago

      It’s like how they put the word gate after something to say that it is a scandal involving the former word.

      Somesort of political scandal involving road maintenance? Oh yes well that’s roadgate then. Even though the Watergate scandal was in fact it scandal in the watergate hotel, rather than a scandal about water.

      • helvetpuli@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        23 days ago

        Someday we’ll have Gate gate, or maybe even another scandal at the Watergate complex, so Watergate gate.

        I can’t wait!

    • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      24 days ago

      I mean, abstaining from animal products makes someone a vegan, right? If you abstain from AI products then it would follow that you’re an “AI vegan”.

      • normalexit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        24 days ago

        It follows, but it is also feels like click bait.

        A definition of vegan is:

        A vegetarian who eats plant products only, especially one who uses no products derived from animals, as fur or leather.

        There is an environmental parallel, and it made me read the article to see what they were on about – so I guess it worked.

        To be clear, I am very pro environment (I live in it); I just feel like this is crossing the streams of related, but completely different movements, isn’t particularly helpful.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        Abstaining from animal products is just vegetarian. Veganism requires an extremely strict adherence to a very specific set of rules concerning animals.

  • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    Calling them after a maligned (if harmless) group seems like a choice to paint refusing to use AI as being annoying, preachy and scorn-worthy.

    They seem very determined to pressure people into using AI regardless of it’s practicality, environmental impact, or anything. Fuck this shit.

    • mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      24 days ago

      There’s been recent pushes in that regard, investment in AI shit has been enormous but the financial payoff for anyone besides hardware manufacturers remains nonexistent. So investors and corporations have recently redoubled their efforts into trying to get everyone to use it in the hopes that this somehow will make them profitable.

  • Toribor@corndog.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    24 days ago

    People just going about their business living their lives as they have for many years…

    Silicon Valley: Hey fuck you. Also I came up with a dumb nickname for you.

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 days ago

    This makes about as much sense as calling Linux users “Windows vegans”.

    Choosing to not use AI isn’t some wacky contrarian position, it’s a tame position that can easily be justified. (Don’t want to use AI? Then don’t.) If anything, trying to assert that constantly using AI for everything would be the new normal is the wacky position.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    24 days ago

    i wonder if they came up with such term to mock those who dont want to use ai and possibly actual vegans on the side.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      They use to mock us with “Luddite” but the Technologists looked into that actual movement (rather than the caricature) and agreed, “yeah sure, like them”. That took the sting out of the pejorative, so they picked another mocked group to connect it with.

    • joe_archer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      24 days ago

      I just don’t use it because it’s shit and doesn’t do anything I need any better than I can do myself in the same time.

      • Tonava@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        24 days ago

        “Hey why don’t you use this tool you don’t need? It does the thing worse than you do and also fucks up the planet in the process!”

  • ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    24 days ago

    I’m choosing to abstain because it’s shit. The ethical things are just a bonus. It produces inaccurate information and bland soulless images.