• elena@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    As a mother of an actual human I gotta say $1,500 for a lifetime is a ridiculous figure that wouldn’t even last a week when covering basic necessities (stroller, bedding, diapers, lotion, etc.)

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      Plus $500/month for a year. It’s to help with diapers, food, etc. it’s a start, but needs a lot more if they don’t want the population to drop off the Mariana trench.

    • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      My copay on each of my kids births was over $2k, one was $7k. A couple of those bills were close to $30k, not that we paid that much, but still.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        17 hours ago

        The US: “we need to be making more babies! Also fuck you, here’s a bill for the amount of a very nice new car! Get fucked, loser!”

  • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is normal in all the developed countries.

    Having and raising children is not a concern only for the mother, the whole community needs to be involved.

  • Sal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    How many studies that boil down to giving people money with no strings attached that always result in “well it improves their lives it seems” are we gonna have before people finally decide it’s worth doing that stuff universally?

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 hours ago

      For some, life has to be suffering. I think that people can’t get past that way of thinking.

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      2 days ago

      The trouble is, the people doing the studies and the people in charge of deciding where public money is spent and acquired, are different groups.

    • Meron35@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      Even Milton Friedman, the Nobel winning economist credited for libertarianism and neoliberal economics was in favour of UBI.

      He specifically advocated for simplifying the tax code, and abolishing the welfare state in favour of progressive tax rates which included a negative income tax, which is a more extreme UBI.

      Right wing policy makers just heard the simplify tax code and abolish welfare state part.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      Many people are driven by feelings. We all are to some extent. But for many people feelings are primary. This comes up all the time.

      You can show charts and studies and everything, but they don’t care. You have to make them feel good about it.

      Frankly I’m kind of sick of pandering to overgrown toddlers, but there’s no escape from it.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 minutes ago

        i mean this is true but also the natural state of humans isn’t to be filled with hatred, if it was just that people are ruled by emotion then the world would be an amazing place since most people have empathy.

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 minutes ago

          It’s the combination of “all feelings no thinkings” and “in-group good, out-group bad” that’s really the problem.

          Just one or the other isn’t a disaster.

    • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      But Dave from the local bar says he knows someone who took advantage of the benefits system so it’s obvious that everyone takes advantage of it and are just lazy and would rather get money for nothing… /S

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 minutes ago

        “well i’m a raging alcoholic and spent all my welfare on the cheapest booze i could find, so obviously that’s what everyone’s going to do”

      • Miaou@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        This article is not saying money does not help, but saying it’s not all it takes. I don’t think this is a hot take at all

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Multiply that figure by at least 10, and it might actually be meaningful.

    EDIT: Ah, there’s a continuing payment aspect to it.

    Well, that’s actually fairly impactful then.

  • plz1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    $1500, once

    $500/month for the first 12 months

    That helps, but that’s a far cry from “born into poverty” solutions

  • kadu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    2 days ago

    The entire point of living in a society, of following the collective social contract, is to assure everybody’s basic needs are met.

    To suggest otherwise is contradictory to the very core of what a society is, and at that point, its better to have no society at all.

    Given how having “no society at all” is impossible with 8 billion of us around… Either provide for everybody’s basic needs, or people need to break the social contract until they enforce their needs are met.

    • atro_city@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      Being egoistic and wanting society to pitch in at the same time is a core tenet of the US republican party. Privatise the gains, socialise the losses is a big thing there. There are millions of people like that and unfortunately they are influencing the world-wide discourse on the issue.

  • sexy_peach@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    In Germany you get 250€ every month per child until they are 18. Even after, if they remain in education. If they move out they can get it directly for themselves.

    • BorgDrone@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Same in the Netherlands and it’s absolutely crazy. We already have too many humans, why stimulate procreation when we don’t even have enough housing for the humans that already exist.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 minutes ago

        you realize basically every single western country has a decreasing population, right? immigration is currently the only thing keeping us all vaguely afloat.
        If things continue like they are then in 50 years europe and america are gonna be fucking miserable as they’re filled with old people and nowhere near enough people to take care of them.

      • sexy_peach@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s not stimulating it’s making it barely affordable to have children.

        Relax the planet is not over populated. Projections already show it might go down soon. Which is fine as well I guess.

      • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Are you sure that’s even what is happening? It seems there would be a line where you could ease the burden of childbirth, especially for women, by supporting them and making it more likely that child becomes a healthy educated adult, but not so much reimbursement that you actually stimulate fertility rates. I would think that the government has data on this.

  • IWW4@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    So 65007500 over the course of the first year. That is good stuff.

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      $7500. $1500 at pregnancy + $500/month for first year = $1500 + $500 x 12 = $1500 + $6000 = $7500

      • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Which juuuuuuuust might cover the ride in an ambulance to go give birth (not the birth itself, just the ride).

        • spongebue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          If you’re being facetious: this is a good thing. It doesn’t solve all problems but it’s a damn good start. No need to get critical about a pretty damn big step in the right direction, especially considering those starting this initiative in a local setting can’t change the healthcare system nationwide.

          If you’re serious: admittedly (and thankfully) I haven’t had to take an ambulance, but when my daughter was born the deductible on our high-deductible plan (after which point all care is covered for the calendar year) was a fair amount under that. The system sucks, but that’s not how it works either.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Id take affordable housing first to add. Its honestly just a weenie benefit. Sure I would add it on to a dozen more useful things but there is so much more useful things. Even like increasing library programs and hours.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    How about free college so we don’t have to see our kids working minimum wage job…give those to AI and robots.

  • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Charity needed to support impoverished countries like Bangladesh, Liberia, Rwanda, Uganda and the good old US of A. Simultaneously the richest and poorest country in the world.