• ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t think that’s correct.

        “Businesses cannot discriminate,” Bondi said, referring to the Office Depot incident. “If you wanna go in and print posters with Charlie’s pictures on them for a vigil, you have to let them do that. We can prosecute you for that.”

        • LePoisson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Pam Bondi is a liar and a fool. Just because some wannabe Nazi bitch in government says something does just make it fact.

          This timeline is so cursed.

        • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s not discrimination. White supremacists and fascists are not a protected ciass. The government is obligated to allow them speech on public property, however Office Depot is not the government or public property. Businesses are not obligated to serve or do business with them or tolerate their speech.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          Exactly the opposite of what these fascist hypocrites said when a bigot refused to make a wedding cake for a same sex couple.

          This Sartre quote applies here:

          Never believe that anti-Semites fascists are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites fascists have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past."

          • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            If you ask the more thoughtful Republicans on the internet, they’ll tell you that they were against this sort of thing, but the Democrats weaponized it anyway and now they’re not going to put themselves at a disadvantage by refusing to retaliate in kind. It’s consistent, although I don’t know if it’s true. Trump and co aren’t principled people but they might not have come up with the idea themselves.