A nightmare

  • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3日前

    Most of my life, I’ve had people scrutinizing me and believing my emotions to be inauthentic because I didn’t contort my face in the precise manner they expect of people feeling a particular emotion.

    Given that AI is well documented to reproduce existing biases found in the training data, I’m betting that this is extra assholish to autistic people.

    • YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13時間前

      Urelated to the original post, but my old man is autistic (undiagnosed, but we’re all pretty sure), and I find the notion that his emotions are not facially conveyed quite heartening.

      He seldom smiles - although when he does it’s genuine. I think we as a family have sometimes made the mistake of projecting emotion onto his often expressionless face, and assuming negative ones.

      It’s easy to conclude that he’s indifferent or bored, when he’s maybe just not naturally able to convey what he’s feeling through expression, which I hadn’t really considered.

    • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2日前

      Botox will produce unteresting results. I’m definitely getting some if I ever go back to the office. Hopefully, people will not see me scowl afterwards.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3日前

      On the other hand, I want this app so I can just read what people are trying to say with subtle facial expressions. Ah yes, head tilted down with left eyebrow raised: they want me to move aside!

  • Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    149
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4日前

    Damn, you’d think that with such advanced technology, they could just automate that job and have the workers move to doing something that isn’t a dehumanizing slog.

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4日前

      Humans are disposable, robots are expensive and require more expensive humans to maintain.

    • InputZero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3日前

      I hate to tell you this but that’s not how it works. The people who used to paint cars as they come off the production line aren’t creating interesting patterns for automation to paint on a car. There are just no production car painters anymore. Automating a job away doesn’t free the human up to actualize their life goals, it eliminates their income and makes their lives more precarious.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4日前

      Robot cost money for maintenance, fuel, and upgrades. Humans take care of all of that themselves and can be made to work harder (upgrade performance) without expensive software, just cheap abuse.

    • ikt@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4日前

      don’t worry, you’re looking at the last phase before robots do it all

  • despite_velasquez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3日前

    It’s more likely that AI will become a middle, or upper manager than a floor worker.

    Humans are still very cheap to work with, especially if you gut worker protections

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3日前

    monitoring facial expressions

    The AI issued reprimands will continue until you smile more.

  • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    4日前

    And of course it’s never to adjust their policies so that every employee feels better and does better, it’s just to find out how to bitch at literally everyone for being human.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3日前

    Before we get robots taking over all our jobs we’ll have AI detection algorithms to make sure we work like robots.

  • affenlehrer@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    4日前

    Even without recording every move the amount of monitoring in factories can be quite substantial. I’ve seen a demo of an AI application of a German car manufacturer where a number of specialized knowledge bots (basically LLMs with specialized RAG for different databases) started from a car with a problem and then correlated the car serial with the production facility, the date, the shift working at the time of production of the car and the part and then some historical data and basically gave the result “nightshift crew 6 made a mistake and their quality often isn’t as good as the other crews” I’m pretty sure if Germany wouldn’t have such a focus on personal data privacy the system could’ve said who exactly is at fault.

    Also even without AI some jobs just have insane monitoring, I believe call centers are some of the worst.

    • IMALlama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4日前

      The amount of traceability in auto plants regarding what was put onto a vehicle would surprise a lot of folks. The capability to do this greatly predates AI and I’m not really sure what AI would add in the example you cited. Nearly any OE part with a barcode can be tied back to the vehicle it was originally installed on, what shift installed it, which other vehicles have a similar lot of parts, etc. Correlating this information with other basic record keeping, like which station installs the part and who was working at that time, makes it very easy to unearth trends. Plants have quality incentives, so there’s a strong motivation to identify areas for improvement.

      In addition to quality, it turns out the small additional cost of all this data capture and storage quickly pays for itself in the case of a spill. Being able to say “this specific set of vehicles” can save a ton of money. That’s part of the reason why very small and targeted recalls have been becoming more common.

      • affenlehrer@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        4日前

        You’re absolutely right and I’m aware that the traceability was already a given. The collected data also was already there and has been for years.

        The AI in this case added basically a simple “human language” interface and some automation. The multi agent approach was basically a “simple” way to integrate multiple systems. You could’ve done the same before but with more manual steps or fully automated but then more rigid and less flexible. E.g. with the AI system you could ask follow up questions or add other bots to the conversation etc.

        • IMALlama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4日前

          Ah, I see. It’s very true that a lot of plants have… older software setups that likely require a bit more of a human touch than should be necessary. I don’t work in a plant, but that’s basically been my career arc - “the poor humans have to hop between how many disconnected systems to accomplish what now? Let’s write some better software to address that.”

          Using AI as a replacement to human glue seems reasonable if you have decent data to traverse. The “data” at my employer is often bespoke to each system, which results in a lot of gray matter mapping names and attributes across systems. Our IT org is working on rolling out glean, but so far it’s basically a better internal search than offering real insights.

          • affenlehrer@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3日前

            Quite interesting. I worked as a software engineer in different areas but not in data sciences. The demo I described was part of a bigger effort to bring visibility to AI related use cases. This one was a relatively good fit in my opinion, as long the data is mostly handled outside of the LLMs and they just “translate” to human language and glue things together. Otherwise I’d fear hallucinations and data not fitting into the context window.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3日前

    amazon does this, even at thier smaller prime warehouses, they will know the moment you accidentally forgot to check for 1 moldy item.

    • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3日前

      If you can afford botox, we’re paying you too much. Future wages will be decreased.

    • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3日前

      It just won’t happen. Humans will face the worst fate possible. I just hope no one reconstructs my charred remains for Roko to torture.