For example, I’m using Debian, and I think we could learn a thing or two from Mint about how to make it “friendlier” for new users. I often see Mint recommended to new users, but rarely Debian, which has a goal to be “the universal operating system”.
I also think we could learn website design from… looks at notes …everyone else.

  • biribiri11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d really like it if Fedora didn’t discourage packaging static libs, but still discouraged building packages with static libs. It’d be nice to have them for development purposes.

    I also wish they made “third party” software a bit easier to access in their installer and distro as a whole. The option to enable Nvidia drivers is buried, and even though flathub is now unrestricted when toggled in the installer, it’s not the first priority when prompted for software to install in gnome software.

    A longer support cycle with less releases would also be nice, but would defeat the purpose of the distro. I guess it’d make more sense if CentOS Stream released more frequently and with more packages available in EPEL, similar to Ubuntu.

    • AProfessional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The option to enable Nvidia drivers is buried

      You just type Nvidia into Software. They’ll never promote it unfortunately.

  • sepulcher@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I totally agree with your assessment about Mint and Debian.

    I like Debian’s minimal approach, but I think minimal can also be user-friendly.

    I still has a nice installer, though.

  • LeFantome@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I do not recall other distros failing to update due to GPG key issues but it has happened to me on Arch distros many times. It is the biggest pain when converting from something like Manjaro to something like EndeavourOS as well.

    I really do not understand why this cannot be fixed.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Debian Wiki would actually like a word.

      There is stuff in there that’s not found anywhere else. For example while researching driverless printing recently I found a huge page on the Debian Wiki but the Arch wiki only has a paragraph saying supporting printers should be detected automatically.

      • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Debian wiki is awsome. But it’s less noob friendly than Arch wiki.

        The web UI looks like an old forum from 2000. Don’t get me wrong, a well written manpage style webpage is way better than an eye candy bloated scripted webpage (IMO) and I really like how detailed the Debian wiki is. But in today’s “mental standards”, the Debian wiki is not attractive enough for most new comer.

        Also, It seems the Debian wiki is not as indexed as Arch wiki on the web.

        Finally… I can’t access their wiki with my VPN ! :/.

        But I do agree, The Debian wiki is a gold mine !!!

  • dotslashme@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not my current distro but I love ChimeraLinux, they manage to put musl and BSD userland into a working wonderful distro. I wish more distros adopted musl.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Linux Mint could learn from Arch and document…anything. 3/5 of the Mint manual is bitching about Ubuntu and the other 2/5 are about printers.

  • thezeesystem@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Probably the start menu back to what it should be. Back with distro windows xp.

    Wait no nvm wrong community.

  • eveninghere@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Debian-variants on cmake. When I install cmake, it installs all libraries’ cmake files without the library binaries themselves. You read it right. The correct way to do this is to install only the base CMake files. CMake configuration files for libraries should be packaged with the library (not CMake).

    Whenever I use CMake, these distros can’t show me the supposed error message. They just pretend configuration progressed and stop at random moments because some binaries are missing.

  • witx@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    endeavourOs from arch by being less opinionated and giving away the awful colour theme

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fedora’s installer is abysmal. There’s a number of installers it could learn from. They’re working on one at the moment, so I hope it’s good.

    Enabling access to proprietary software should also install audio/video codecs. Or at least have a separate checkbox for it, like (I believe) Ubuntu has.

    • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Fedora’s installer is abysmal.

      I thought so too. It doesn’t have enough options for power users and too many for newcomers. It caters to a middleground that barely exists.

      Enabling access to proprietary software should also install audio/video codecs.

      The codecs are also the #1 thing that annoy me in Fedora. Because of shitty US patent laws the rest of the world has to suffer.

  • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The one thing I wish every distro would incorporate is the way Gentoo handles config file updates. If there are any changes you get the option of using a very simple side by side merge where you go through all the differences of the old and new configuration where you can decide which one to use going forward.

    • MonkderDritte@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Pacman just dumps you a .pacnew or .pacsave, leaving the comparison to you (y’know, KISS). Your change isn’t touched.

    • Oisteink@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      While you will get somewhat the same from apt, I like the Debian way of providing base config support in packages and have local config loaded by include statements.

      As you don’t edit the default config and automatic updates can happen w/o user input and your config will stay safe

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        What really sucks about the Debian way is how it tries to start daemons in the post-install scripts and if that fails (say because the default config tries to use a port already taken) the entire package system shits itself and is unusable until you fix it.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          the entire package system shits itself

          Usually just the one package fails, unless you have other packages that have a dependency on it. I agree that it’s annoying though.

            • Oisteink@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I might be a special case as I Mostly use Linux for servers. But I have maybe experienced one such case on the last three years on our 50-odd servers

  • Pacmanlives@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    OpenSuSe - snapper for taking btrfs snapshots and rolling back. It’s basically a bulletproof way to do updates and recovery. Get a bad update or change a config in correctly you can roll back. Updates it automagically does this for you

    • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Possible in Debian. The SpiralLinux guy (who also made Gecko Linux) has it set up on install.

    • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      And know how to use an existing btrfs partition. And always [at least have an option to] show exactly what the automatic installer is going to do before I run anything. There’s gotta be a middle ground between “we’ll just surprise you” and “here, do everything yourself”.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        OpenSUSE has a guided setup if ypu dont want a surprise or don’t know manual setups requires. then prior to starting givea you a summary of what qill be done.

          • BCsven@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Each one has good parts, but I think openSUSE did a lot to make things easier for new users to linux

            • Install, you see software summary, you can click and alter what patterns or packages you want included.
            • auto snapshots when you enter package manager or admin tools, easy rollback with snapper or boot list
            • a GTK front for all of YAST2-GUI components. All system, network, firewall, service, packages, boot and kernel config are available as GUI dialogs (as well as many others)