• filister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Back then I read an article about how M$ is crippling the ability of other office packets to read their docx and xslx formats who are supposed to be open formats, but in reality are written in a way never to be fully integrated by competing products. More information about their pseudo open standard: https://fsfe.org/activities/msooxml/msooxml.en.html

    Munich in the past have used Linux PCs for quite some time until eventually switching back to windows. Back then they were citing the same incompatibilities to open and read and display M$ office files correctly. So Microsoft is definitely abusing their position as a market leader and trying to cripple competition as much as they can.

  • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Offices have way more power to convert the world to Linux than even gaming does.

    And ofc, Microsoft is well aware and is not interested in letting that happen.

    • TwoCubed@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Correct. Bavaria once tried the same thing, but then MS went to the local politicians, sucked their dicks a bit and boom, back to MS products it is! Hopefully the north doesn’t fall for that kind of shit, and they likely won’t because Bavaria is a backwards piece of shit of a Bundesland while Schleswig Holstein is kinda cool.

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Hopefully this at least forces Microsoft to rethink riddling their bullshit with ads. I feel sorry for people who are still stuck with that trash for whatever reason.

      • saigot@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m pretty sure the enterprise version of Windows does not and will never have ads. So not super relavent when talking about a transition to Linux in an office setting.

        • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Edge “new tab” default is hellishly full of ads and “news”, the Taskbar has stock price information alongside weather and sports, and search in the start menu still shows internet searches. Even on enterprise.

          • saigot@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            You can remove the stock ticker even on home edition, on enterprise you can make it go away by default for new installs as well. And with enterprise, you can disable edge entirely and unlike home edition it won’t re-enable on upgrade.

            • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              None of these things should exist in the first place. Edge will stay disabled until Microsoft feels its been long enough since the last time they got slapped for it, then they’ll push it again.

    • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      And ofc, Microsoft is well aware and is not interested in letting that happen.

      This is true, but there are only so many times that they can pull off what they did in Munich. If enough cities keep trying at this, there’s no way they’re going to be able to hold the floodgates back forever.

      I’m usually a pessimist, but stories like this actually do get my hopes up

  • Call Me Mañana@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    So good to read this, the 2016 coup d’etat represented, among other things, a huge rollback of our infrastructure that was being passed on to open source systems for years, good to know that we are resuming the right path

    CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • NateNate60@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    What I predict will happen is that Microsoft will offer them Windows for free or bribe the relevant decision makers with free Surface Pro laptops (for “evaluation”) or other Microsoft paraphernalia.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s not how they do it, of only because it would tank Windows PR image as “free stuff”.

      What you do is arrange it with the government to alocate huge budget sums to purchasing Windows and other stuff from Microsoft at normal market value, then return half the money to the government officials under the desk in whatever form you care or can get away with, straight up bribes if you can swing it.

      Microsoft gets to remain dominant, Windows appears to have been purchased at normal value and gets to keep its clout as fancy expensive stuff, and the decision makers get mad money out of it. Everybody wins.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_licensing_corruption_scandal

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Or with creating Microsoft offices in their cities, like they did with Munich.

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I feel like free products just for decision makers sound like a straight bribe, and free Windows is still not even worth more then free and open source …

  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Nothing like paying your consulting friends to move everything to Linux to then pay them again to move back to Windows later one. Just like someone is Germany did at some point. :)

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Interesting (and poorly paraphrased) story about a successful Linux migration:

    spoiler

    Several years ago someone made a post or cross-posted on r/sysadmin where OP (lead sysadmin) was in meeting with management and they complained about windows and the licensing costs.

    OP jokingly passed a comment about switching to Linux and management actually thought he was throwing out a real idea.

    Upon explaining the much lower cost due to FOSS and maybe only requiring a small contract for consulting/support, management actually agreed to his idea.

    He successfully transitioned the entire company to OpenSUSE which he determined was the best enterprise distro for desktop use.

    The other important part was how he handled the transition. iirc he got it going by first offering it to tech savvy departments who were ecstatic to get new stuff, so he lined it up with a hardware upgrade.

    Naturally the rest of the departments heard about it and also wanted the new stuff which locked them into using Linux.

    There were several holdouts clinging to Windows, but with the majority showing success, management forced them to change as well.

    For his use case, most of the employees were using web apps, so almost no additional desktop apps were required.

  • Mio@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I actually want Microsoft to do better. Then can, they just ignore user feedback about user choice, design, what to work on etc. Good if they start to get some competition. I wonder what will happen when ARM gets common in a normal PC-build. Good opportunity to make some big changes.