To me, a european, those urban areas packed with the same house over and over again always seem so depressing and boring. Is there any variety or does it look like this for
kilometersmiles?Generally it is each subdivision, but it can be larger groups of homes like that.
They are depressing, but people buy them because they’re generally new construction and represent good value. You get over it if it saves you enough $$$.
I’ve yet to go into any new construction that wasn’t shit compared to the 100 year old house I grew up in. That place was rock solid. The only problem with it was a roof leak that was actually from the extension my parents had done on the 2nd floor (aka new construction). By comparison every time I go visit their new house they’ve uncovered some new shoddy workmanship from the shit builders that inly focus on cranking out houses as fast and cheap as possible. I hate so much that they sold their old place for this garbage I’m going to have to fix when I inherit it.
I agree, old homes have hella survivorship bias. But, you are playing roulette that nothing with fail immediately. The advantage of new construction is that you don’t have to worrru about any stupid retrofits and that you know nothing will break for at least a little bit.
Or worry about all of the asbestos, lead, and formaldehyde -laced building materials that were all of the rage in previous decades.
I think Formaldehyde is a bigger problem in new construction than old. Asbestos and lead are harder to deal with though. Formaldehyde just needs ventilation and a few years of offgassing.
I agree, and these houses look way too small and overpriced for a comfortable family setting, but stating that identical homes packed next to each other is purely an American thing is disingenuous. It’s a byproduct of capitalism, which supersedes national borders
In Chicago there is one block just north of Wrigley Field that was a demo for a planned community decades ago. Each of the 10 or so connected houses on one side of the street are all different. The opposite side of the street is identical, but mirrored. That means the northernmost house on the west side of the street is identical to the southernmost house on the east side of the street. The effect is that it looks like a very unique and natural community in spite of being completely planned and regimented.
That’s a better approach I think. It’s economically viable to make similar houses, but aesthetically and psychologically pleasing for houses to be different and unique, even if it’s just a variation per house on a street and not every street itself
Those don’t look as weird because they’re connected. They look like a single building, which is okay to have a consistent style
It seems like a huge waste of vertical space. If they condensed all of that into a small 8-10 story building, they could create green spaces all around it for everyone to enjoy.
Lol, then there would be stairs. We’re fat over here. We don’t do stairs.
/s in tone, but seriously we don’t do stairs.
I know.
deleted by creator
Variety is against the HOA, you don’t want to go against the HOA.
HOAs should be a thing of the past.
nah, HOAs should have legally regulated limits on what they can and cannot do, sweden has HOAs too but basically all they do is pool together money to pay for infrastructure in the neighbourhood.
like, i for one quite like having paved roads and functional pipes, but i guess you do you.
like, i for one quite like having paved roads and functional pipes, but i guess you do you.
Do non HOA homes not have paved roads and working pipes?
There are no such areas, i’m not sure how you envision common infrastructure being maintained without an organization owning it?
Or do you just envision the municipality being in charge of maintaining your street’s piping? Have fun waiting half a year for them to get to it when it breaks.
Or do you just envision the municipality being in charge of maintaining your street’s piping?
That’s how my neighborhood works.
Have fun waiting half a year for them to get to it when it breaks.
They’re usually there within an hour if that happens.
Ending HOAs is literally an act of antifascism.
When my wife and I were looking for a house. I automatically filtered any house part of an HOA. They really should be a thing of the past.
Unless actual buildings are attached, they shouldn’t exist.
And buildings means a community park with an Olympic sized pool, at least. Only HOA I’ve ever heard of that made a tiny bit of sense, maintained a park, golf course, and pool for the community that lived there.
It really just keeps on going. It’s hell
This isn’t what most houses are like in the US. Sure, there’s a lot like them, but places that don’t have a strong HOA (most places) become very diverse after a while. My home was built in the 60s and was initially very similar to the ones around it. Over time each house gets changed little by little and every house becomes unique.
Not only is it boring, it’s made in the shittiest way possible. It’s the American way, after all. You want properly installed outlets? What are you, some sort of royalty or something? Properly sealed windows? Look at Mrs. Moneybags over here. The siding is falling off the house? What did you expect from a $350k home?
✅ Lawn
✅ Driveway that fits two cars
✅ Two baths
✅ Not sharing walls with neighbor
That driveway does not fit two cars
One of them in the pic has two cars. Of course, the ass is sticking into the road a bit but ehhhh it counts.
In a lot of places you can get a ticket for blocking the sidewalk.
I’m thinking sidewalks aren’t being used much, if at all, in this fine Texas community.
Yeah maybe. An HOA would fine them for it regardless.
I wonder if you’d be allowed to park on the street, like parallel park, blocking your own driveway? Or maybe there is guest parking. Otherwise I can never see how you would have company over. Or share that place with a significant other.
Otherwise, they don’t look too bad. Wished there were pics of the interior.
Bottom right seems to be able to squeeze two cars.
While blocking the footpath making your disabled/pushchair-pushing/child neighbours life just a little bit more unsafe and harder.
disabled/pushchair-pushing/child
Uh, blocked sidewalks is the least of their concern if they live in these 1 bedroom houses. Where’s the child going to sleep? In one of the two baths?
“It’s ok to inconvenience people, because they probably have bigger inconveniences bothering them”
√ same price as a real house for an adult
I’m begging developers to stop.
The problem isn’t “not enough houses,” the problem is rich fuck “investors” buying up all the empty houses to sit on them
No, don’t stop building. The problem is rich fucks and their politician friends who won’t implement any meaningful rules to curb the behaviour.
I’m a fan of the ‘y’all can have one’ rules for home ownership. Anything after the first should come with cumulative tax penalties, +10% to the total value of your property assessment per property should be sufficient to start. So someone with three $1M homes is looking at a property tax bill of 130%.
While I am dreaming, I’d like a pony.
No, don’t stop building
If we’re talking about dreaming, I’d like a world where humans keep to relatively small and dense habitable areas anf leave the rest of the natural world alone
We do legitimately need more housing. The population is always growing. The thing is we need sensible mid rise buildings with 1,000 sq ft 2 bedroom units. The hilarious thing is we could build them fast and cheap using modular techniques but the rent would still be horrendous because of the investors.
Honestly not a bad deal if you live alone. Make an offer for 130k and settle for 145k then get approved for a loan with APR around 5% and you could be making monthly payments under 600 USD for 20 years. That’s a lot lower than rent, I’ll tell you that, and you can get your equity back at the end when you move.
Only issue is the loan term, variable property value, and if you’re actually buying the land or just the abode.
You’re not getting 5% APR on a fixed rate.
It’s unlikely at this exact moment, for sure, but USA national average 30 year rate was below that less than two years ago, 2.65% in 2021, and it was below 5% for almost the entirety of the 2010s.
Good point
Don’t forget the mortgage insurance for several hundred a month if you’re not able to put that 30k down to pass the 20% thresshold.
PMI would be roughly $70/mo in the example they posted.
Not bad by today’s horrid standards
Ftfy
What would you propose is a reasonable deal, then?
A shoebox like this should, in a reasonable world, be like 50k. Many years ago someone with a basic factory job could have a REAL home for a family of four on his income alone. Then boomers ruined everything and, now, people look at this bullshit as ‘good.’
Yes by 2024 standards it’s ‘good’. But that’s like saying only being 400k in debt after cancer treatment is ‘good’
Yeah, but American homes are unsustainable in their sizes. What you’re looking at there is already the norm in Japan. We don’t need as much space as we use for single family houses in this country. Sure we have the space, but we also have a homelessness crisis. These tiny homes are a very good solution for that.
I will agree that $150,000 seems a bit higher than it should be, but depending on how close to San Antonio this is, that is fairly typical for a major city in pricing. If this is some suburb in the sticks, then yeah, they need to be asking around $75,000
Space isn’t the issue here. We have more empty homes than we have homeless people.
Prices aren’t astronomical because we’re running out of space.
They are astronomical because we build too large. That accounts for the vast majority of home ownership cost increases. The average home size is up 230%+ from the 70s, or 300% per person.
This makes up the vast majority of the difference in prices seen since that time.
Other direct causes are that we add two or three car garages (30k+) and increased home construction standards ( which add cost up front but often save money long term).
When looking at a price per area, the price is almost static (after accounting for inflation).
I mean, if you’re making $12 USD an hour, which is considered very low, then you’re still only spending 28% monthly wages on the above example I gave, and you get to keep what you put in minus depreciation when you resell, sometimes at a profit. Like I said, it’s way better than renting. Plus, these aren’t trailer homes, they have an actual foundation and a connection to city sewer, so the probably don’t depreciate very much if you take good care of it.
Yeah, the boomers fucked up the American Dream and now family homes aren’t available to the majority, but the property in the image is not a bad deal at all and I stand by that opinion.
That price, but 1.5 to 2x the size so my
shedhouse isn’t 6’ from my neighborsshedhouseYeah that’s fair, I hope they’re well insulated so you don’t have to listen to your neighbors 24/7.
just get an apartment holy shit
That would probably be more expensive.
Fuck ownership! Rent everything!
You can buy apartments too. Specifically I think you buy the right to live there indefinitely and not the actual building.
dunno how it works in the US, but in sweden there are like 3-4 ways it can be done, and fwiw renting here generally comes with the right to continue renting however long you like thanks to very strict renters’ rights laws.
I know two of the ways to own an apartment is either straight up owning the actual apartment itself (with some asterisks obviously because it’s part of a building), and the most common form is to own the right to live there (and pay maintenance costs, which is why i find it pointless to own) and sell it on.
i mean you do realize that owning housing comes with maintenance costs, right? why would i spend money i probably don’t actually have to buy a house when an apartment would have about the same rent as the maintenance costs (and the ability to just move if the apartment is flooded or whatever)?
Home maintenance sucks, but its not that expensive. Certainty basics are on YT. If it were a real challenge then apartments wouldn’t exist either. How often does your building need a new roof?
Cool now you’re only locked into a closet for the next 20 years
You can sell before your mortgage is repaid, and when you do you get to keep what is left after repaying the bank. It’s called equity.
I live in an 800sqft home by myself. 1 bed, 1 bath. I have plenty of space.
I love that Americans would still rather have crappy rectangles of lawn that they never use for anything than build up to the edge of the plot and have more rooms. Those plots are probably slightly bigger than that of my three bedroom terrace house.
Blame the zoning laws for that. They require minimum setbacks on each side and a maximum floor area to land area ratio.
It’s like a suburban tract home developer with a case of brain worms tried to build townhomes based solely on a verbal description he got from space alien visiting Brooklyn for the first time, relayed over a cell phone with one bar of reception.
60m2 for people who don’t know yee haw units
It’s actually pretty big if it weren’t for the lawn and driveway.
You can’t buy a shed for that price where I live. An apartment of that size would be $2500+ per month.
I don’t want this to be the future but it’s better than a future where no one can buy anything at all.
Exactly. I saw the price and the sq ft. and I was like, damn, I wish that wasn’t in Texas.
I fucking hate the real estate market where I live. So do all my roommates.
My wife and I finally decided to take the leap and buy back in 2022. We had been waiting for years for the “market to correct” and finally just decided that we needed to stop waiting. Within months interest rates became unaffordable, and they’ve only gotten worse since then. We would not be able to reasonably afford our current home with current interest rates. It’s insane. The whole thing is rigged.
The houses are so close together and have so little yard I don’t see why they didn’t just turn them into townhouses.
Probably local planning restrictions, they’re quite fucked up in the states.
Plus, people are obviously superstitious about shared walls.
“Listen, you’re gonna live as the markets dictate. The labour markets, the consumer markets… are you listening?”
*me, lighting the Molotov coctail*
Ah-huh. Continue.
You don’t have to be a wizard to cast a fireball
I wouldn’t be surprised to find a fair amount of computer wizards skulking around Lemmy
Literally half the house is a garage.This is fucking hell.It’s not even a garage.
What’s the use of having 2 bathrooms when there is only 1 bedroom?
If one half of a couple has IBS, a second bathroom is a necessity
100% bowl busting mood
Right? We were just fine with 3 bedrooms and one bathroom for decades.
-
If you’re a couple, you can both use a toilet at the same time.
-
If you live alone you might want a separate bathroom for guests. The second one is possibly a half bathroom.
Understood. But with such limited space, wouldn’t the home be better served with a guest room/study instead of a 2nd bathroom?
A double mattress can be larger than a bathroom.
Having lived with partner for 10+ yrs, I’ll take the 2nd bathroom every time
-
The bedroom is obviously upstairs and would have an adjacent bathroom. Assuming they have guests, the builders have put in a downstairs bathroom for them.
A bathroom doubles as an inebriated guest bedroom
For fucks sake just drop four shipping containers, rig them, dry wall them, and walk away. 150k for that and it’s got a little fancy art fling to it? That’s fucking insulting.
Why would you want 2 baths for a single bedroom house…
Have you lived with another human that needs to shit at same time as you? It definitely happens.
This can be solved by the technology of just waiting a few minutes until they are done.
If you have the space for two bathrooms then sure, go ahead, but the argument here is that there isn’t really space for it.
Piss off. You’ve obviously never lived with someone and experienced the moments it was critical to use the toilet.
Ever lived with someone while both of you were ill and had diarrhea?
Your reply is ignorant.
Just get 1 bathroom with 2 toilets
Side by side or facing each other?
Depends. Do you prefer cooperative multiplayer or competitive multiplayer?
Facing one another so you can hold hands for support during your times of struggle.
Just sit on the other’s lap and drop that double decker deuce, my friend. Also saves water with a single flush.
You underestimate my power.
Hell yeah. Or if u have to piss while your wife is shitting just have her spread her legs and go in between. Gotta be on point with ur aim tho.
What if one of you is dropping nuggets and the other is “draining the oil pan” with a bout of IBS? You need to be sure who’s the bottom deck.
You can have a separate half bath for guests.
when you and your wife both have to take a massive shit in the morning
Do you people not have guests over? Do you want them traipsing upstairs and using your bath room?
One for the ensuite, one for the “main” bathroom when guests are over or whatever. I assume there’s still a living room of sorts.
You are right, check out the 3D tour:
https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/7117-Elm-Cv-San-Antonio-TX-78244/2053945461_zpid/
Looks really cramped…
I like that they don’t even try to fit a bed in that small ass room
They’re so tiny. They’d might as well make an apartment complex or multi-family homes.
