Israeli officials fear the pope’s vocal criticisms and symbolic gestures - such as this year’s nativity scene in St Peter’s Square featuring baby Jesus resting on a Palestinian keffiyeh - may influence global public opinion.

Created by Bethlehem artists Johny Andonia and Faten Nastas Mitwasi, the nativity scene prominently features Palestinian materials, including olive wood, a symbol of Palestinian resilience.

During its unveiling, Pope Francis condemned the global arms industry for profiting from human suffering and reiterated his call for an end to all wars, urging the faithful to remember those suffering in the holy land.

The display, praised by many as a message of solidarity and peace, drew backlash from Israel’s supporters, who accused the Vatican of promoting a pro-Palestinian agenda.

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    The pope is fine with Ukrainian children being murdered tho….

    Fuck the pope and his piece of shit “religion”. Obligatory fuck Israel/IDF

      • JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yeah. But then they are allowed to make fun of the Pope saying stuff like “Between the Pope and air conditioning, I’d choose air conditioning.” and you must laugh for some reason even though the dude is Jewish and so the Pope is nothing to him like any religious leader is nothing to me.

  • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Israel’s children killing business is cutting into the church child molesting business. It’s a conflict of interest.

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    20 hours ago

    only an anti-semitist would say “don’t kill children”. they should get him fired for this.

  • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    146
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is NotTheOnion material. Like, are you actually mad that the fucking Pope is not on board with killing children?

      • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Despite being highly upvoted and the comment section agreeing with the onion-y-ness as far as I saw. Ridiculous. Still a good post

    • TotallyNotADolphin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Ofcourse the catholic church is not onboard with murdering children. How will the clergy get laid if all the children are killed?

      But on a more serious note, the current pope is actually doing a decent job of calling out atrocities and promoting some of the decent aspects of their faith, and not propping up all of the bad stuff as god’s will

      • CityPop@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        He’s also a transphobe who uses his platform to attack trans people.

        The current pope is good at PR, that’s all.

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Its a strange world isnt it. In the last election I was shouted down on here by trans supporters who said you cant expect perfection from everyone, because Harris supported trans rights, but also was a supporter of Israeli genocide as well, which I thought was a bigger issue for humanity to address immediately with the limited time to apply pressure that was available.

          So I’ll just parrot that right back now along with the idea that “you dont tease the fat guy at the gym”. Following the metaphor, the pope is currently on the treadmill shedding some pounds, so I’m going to hold my derisive comments about that particular rapist cult for the moment. And he’s a whole lot better than all the other popes of my lifetime. But next time he opens his mouth about trans rights, sure, kick his arse.

            • CityPop@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              A perfect example of centrism allowing evil to flourish because it’s lesser.

              The alternative to a shit pope isn’t a slightly less shit pope, it’s having no pope at all.

              But rather than argue for that, people argue to defend the papacy. It’s truly mind boggling.

        • Infynis@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          He’s about as with it as you can expect the Pope to be. The Catholic Church has never really lead the charge of progress

          • ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            The fact that he’s not advocating for the wholesale execution of trans people out in the street makes some people think he’s some kind of “crazy” pro LGBT “corruptor” of good Christian families.

            At least here where I am, a stone’s throw away from Palestine, these are not topics that are dealt with with a lot of open mindedness. I hate “hate the sin not the sinner” just as much as anyone else on Lemmy, but I’ve seen the effect his rhetoric (specifically on gay people) has had and it’s certainly better than Benedictus 16 before him.

            I don’t agree with everything he says (I attended a Catholic school, which is never a faith-enhancing experience) but I’m damn certain that he’s slowly dragging most of the Catholic faithful kicking and screaming into the 21st century when he just as easily could have been ten times worse on social issues. As far as a pope goes, this is pretty much the best case scenario as far as this stuff is concerned. The industrial-scale child abuse still needs a lot of work though. Let’s not kid ourselves.

            Now if only he knew what a compiler is.

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Is he? Is he really as with it as I can expect the pope to be? Is stopping the mass molestation and rape of children really too much to ask?

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Progressiveness is hard, you have to hate someone.

            I have to say as far as inspirational quotes go, it lacks something.

              • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                20 hours ago

                No I’m making fun of the fact of that the pope is a “good Pope” because he’s slightly better than the previous popes. It’s a pretty low bar.

    • irotsoma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      But, security… Aren’t tens of thousands of children’s lives a small price to pay to stop the violence?

      /s

        • CityPop@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Tell that to the 42 kids who got mauled to death by bears for making fun of someone’s hair.

        • Hoimo@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 hours ago

          That’s what the Egyptians did. When the Israelites spared the Midianite women, Moses got angry at them and commanded them to kill everyone. Except the virgin girls, probably for completely wholesome Christian reasons.

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          Yeah except for all those other times when everyone was slaughtered down to their animals. Or you know, that time when the entire human and air-breathing animal population of the planet except for 0.0000000001% were killed.

          Yeah those plagues weren’t too bad comparatively.

  • Darkard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Remember that part of Jesus’s story where he had to flee because a mad king was systematically murdering children because he was scared that the child was “the king of kings”.

    What a wild parallel.

    • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      If you believe in the divine Jesus, and have a decent understanding of history, surely you would know that the man would look more like the average Palestinian than the average Israeli.

      When it comes to religion though logic must leave the building.

  • Elrecoal19@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Child murderers complain that their child murdering is being called out”

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The vatican is finally right about something, even relevant, for once. Good for them. They have a lot to make up for, and this is a start.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    “Yesterday, children were bombed. This is cruelty, not war,” the pontiff declared last Saturday, lamenting the immense humanitarian crisis in the besieged enclave.

    Israel lashed out in response, accusing the pope of ignoring its security concerns.

    Israeli foreign ministry spokesperson Oren Marmorstein accused the pope of ignoring the broader context of Israel’s military actions, which have resulted in the killing of 17,000 children.

    Maybe everyone should ignore a “security concern” if the only way to alleviate that concern is murdering 17,000 children?

    Because whatever group you’re concerned about, probably won’t like you anymore after you murder 17,000 of their children…

    Especially when the reason for your concern is people are mad you keep killing them in the first place.

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      To be precise, not all 17k Palestinian children had the luxury of immediate death from being blown up with American bombs by Israeli terrorists. Many of them were in fact killed by sniper fire, with an alarmingly large percentage of the murdered children dying from headshot or chest shot sniper wounds. These are kids as young as 5 and 6 being headshot from miles away by Israeli snipers. This has been corroborated many times over by American doctors who were working in the Gaza hospitals, before all of those hospitals got blown up too.

      There is no possible security concern which could justify such acts of terrorism. Israel’s motivation is clearly a land grab, and Netanyahu’s is clearly to remain in power throughout the slaughter. They are absolute monsters.

    • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Have you considered that even when Israel doesn’t kill children, people get upset about their children being corrupted in other ways instead?

      Edit: /s I guess?

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Well, that’s a hypothetical.

        Because Israel has been systemically killing children since England invented it. And the people they first put in charge were killing natives before that.

        Hell, their first PM even admitted they were stealing the natives land:

        Why should the Arabs make peace? If I was an Arab leader I would never make terms with Israel. That is natural: we have taken their country. Sure, God promised it to us, but what does that matter to them? Our God is not theirs. We come from Israel, it’s true, but two thousand years ago, and what is that to them? There has been anti-Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They only see one thing: we have come here and stolen their country. Why should they accept that?

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Ben-Gurion#Zionist_leadership_between_1919_and_1948

        It honestly wasn’t that long ago, and Israel has known from its inception that the people they stole the land from won’t just forget.

        But today you have people with a straight face claiming the people whose land was stolen “invaded” land that was stolen from them literally a day earlier…

        Sure, some understand reality and just spreading propaganda, but you still run into some who legit belief the bullshit.

        • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          I do think it’s a bit more subtle than that. Throughout history people of all faiths, including Jews, Christians and Muslims and of various nations including Arabs, Kurds, Turks and Persians, have made the Middle East their home. The overall division of land at this moment implies that only a tiny slice goes to the Jews. I think realistically after WWII the parties could have come together to discuss independence from the UK in conjunction with a slice of land for the Jews.

          Of course, what happened instead was that the English gave land that was highly contested by all to the Jews, without any attempt at asking the opinion of the people living there.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Throughout history people of all faiths, including Jews, Christians and Muslims and of various nations including Arabs, Kurds, Turks and Persians, have made the Middle East their home.

            Yes, that was the demographic makeup of what is now Israel for thousands of years prior to the creation of Israel as a religious ethnostate…

            The overall division of land at this moment implies that only a tiny slice goes to the Jews.

            It’s only a tiny slice when talking about the entire Middle East…

            But even then, it’s an area where only Jewish people have full rights and can vote for political leaders…

            How many countries in the Middle East can only Christians vote for political leaders?

            the parties could have come together to discuss independence from the UK in conjunction with a slice of land for the Jews.

            Seriously…

            Why does there have to be religious ethnostates at all?

            Your entire argument is based on religious ethnistates having to exist, but they just fucking don’t.

            No country should require any religious determination to be able to vote for political leader.

            realistically after WWII the parties could have come together to discuss independence from the UK in conjunction with a slice of land for the Jews.

            Why not give the indigenous people autonomy after WW1 when the Ottoman empire was dissolved?

            Why give it European immigrants?

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        so you saying people will be upset about one thing or another anyway, so who cares if Israel is murdering children? Thats a bold argument. Lets see how that works out for you.

        • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Not at all. I’m suggesting that people are upset with Israel for more reasons than just the killing. They kill people because they refuse to stop doing those other things which upset others.

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Thats a pretty convoluted way of saying that, but I guess I’ll take your word for it.

            • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Try thinking about what those other things are, related to corrupting children, which people are often upset with Israel for, and you might understand why I said it that way here.

              • kreskin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Well “Ogmios, the god of eloquence”, if you would just said what you mean, we could get this done in a lot fewer comments. Actually, nevermind. I’m not interested anymore. I regret ever replying.

                “Blocked ogmios”

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    So, if not murdering children is pro-Palestinian, then I guess I’m pro-Palestinian.

    And logically, that means being pro-Israeli (or at least pro-Israeli government, because I know there are lots of Israelis who are not happy about what their government is doing) is also pro-child-murder. Their logic, not mine!

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        And the logic of fascists is “we can wipe them all out, so then the threat will be gone”, ignoring the practical impossibility of actually killing so many millions of people completely, as well as the fact that the entire world can see what they’re doing, and have connections to the victims, so they are making way more enemies than they started with.

        It’s a delusion of superiority, that they are so powerful and their foes so weak that they can overwhelm them.

      • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Absolutely if you go on killing their parents, their brithers and sisters; bomb their playgrounds, their schools. What else they are going to do except for lashing out anyone. These would be the kids vulnerable to be brainwashed into doing further horriffic things.

  • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    There’s nothing that says victims can’t become aggressors. This is true for individuals as well as large groups of people, including nation-states. A child who was abused can become an abusive parent. A religious group that was persecuted for years can become an oppressor. Jews were victims of a genocide a few years ago, and were persecuted for years and years before in Europe, but Israel is not a victim anymore and the rest of the world should tell it to stop acting like one because they are the one commiting genocide.