• Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    22 hours ago

    In a poll largely pointing to positive results, this one was a big fucking yikes:

    Denying alleged gang members living in the U.S. illegally the ability to challenge their deportation in court:

    • All U.S. Adults: 50%
    • Hispanic Adults: 55%

    JFC. “Should due process be cancelable on account of alleged ties?” 50% yes. And slightly more among people who are most likely to be alleged.

    People need to get it through their thick skulls that cops at any level are not trustworthy deciders of guilt. The whole reason our system exists with all this process is that the founders knew they’d make false allegations.

    • Botzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I assume they haven’t seen the rundown on the math that gets people rounded up as “alleged” gang members.

      The copium is strong right now and that’s major/“legacy” media’s fault.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      18 hours ago

      You’ve called these people racists what else could you possibly do to get it through their thick skulls that this is wrong.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    He doesn’t care, if he stays in power past Jan 2029 he won’t need votes to do it…

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 day ago

    According to Madrid, “The polling data confirms what should have been obvious to any seasoned political observer: Americans reached a nuanced position on immigration that the Trump administration completely misread.”

    • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 day ago

      He didn’t misread anything. We can see now. It was never just about immigration. Trump, but more likely one/some of his sycophants, explained how hard-line immigration enforcement could help in removing political opposition with the help of a corrupt and stacked Supreme Court. The ability to revoke birthright citizenship so he can ship you off to whatever hellhole country he wants or you die in a concentration camp waiting to be deported, either is acceptable.

      • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Trump, but more likely one/some of his sycophants, explained how hard-line immigration enforcement could help in removing political opposition with the help of a corrupt and stacked Supreme Court

        It’s definitely Stephen Miller. Zero doubt. He is the true believer in racist/white supremacy and the New York Times’ recent story had multiple anecdotes about the DOJ and DHS/ICE being directly controlled by him, while Bondi and Noem are only interested in making TV appearances.

    • ryper@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think the only position on immigration Trump cares about is Stephen Miller’s. Also, someone who’s supposed to be term limited, and will definitely rig the election if he somehow runs again anyway, doesn’t really need to care about public opinion too much. It’s not like there seems to be much risk of anybody overthrowing the government.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I wouldn’t call it nuanced. Many Americans just didn’t really think about how immigrants impact their lives or what the words Trump said would mean in practice. They didn’t have deep thoughts about how things should work and militarized raids are not it, they just kind of didn’t think about it but now they have to and they don’t like it.

  • whygohomie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    They’ll eventually fall in line and bleat about everyone else being a sheep. Like every time ever.

    • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      That’s not what the poll asked. Wording matters a lot in polls. The question was worded as approval of deporting undocumented people in general - not necessarily of how Trump is conducting it. Quite a number of people have bought into the false the right wing narratives that most undocumented people are [insert negative thing here]. Then when they see brutal operations that don’t reflect that narrative they start to oppose the operations - but not always realize the premise was false. When you poll on how Trump is conducting things, the approval falls a lot more

      EDIT: which also isn’t to say that those myths can’t be busted, just that such a thing takes longer. Acknowledgement that the current operations are horrifying is the first step towards that

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      “Cygnal serves GOP campaigns, committees, caucuses and center-right public affairs issue efforts with forward-thinking polling, analytics & targeting.”

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Word a poll to fit what you want to say and you can make any statement…

    There was just a poll posted the other day 60% of Hispanic people approve Trump’s deportation of illegal (key word) immigrants: Trump doing well!

    This poll, “79% say immigrants help the country” (missing the word illegal): Trump doing bad!

    Forget the polls, the midterm election results will speak volumes.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      “Cygnal serves GOP campaigns, committees, caucuses and center-right public affairs issue efforts with forward-thinking polling, analytics & targeting.”

      Vs.

      Gallup.