• dhork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          In the House, the Speaker normally controls the agenda, and nothing can be schedules without their approval. However, there is a process where if a member gathers the signatures of a majority of Members on an issue, the Speaker is forced to put it on the agenda.

          Their petition to release the Epstein files currently has 217 out of the 218 signatures necessary, it has every sitting Democrat on board, and enough Republicans to bring it to the threshold. But there was a vacant seat, which a Democrat won recently. That Democrat is on the record as wanting to sign the petition.

          Normally, these special election winners are sworn in right away, but Speaker Johnson adjourned the House before she could be sworn in. Adjourning the House looked particularly bad, because it all but guaranteed a shutdown.

          • Asafum@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Adjourning the House looked particularly bad, because it all but guaranteed a shutdown.

            I don’t think they’re concerned about that. They rely on the fact that most voters won’t know this and the Republicans can just run around saying “the Democrats forced us to shut down!” even though the Republicans were the ones who did it early and stopped any chance of continued negotiations.

            Republicans revel in the lack of nuanced discussion. :(