• Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    And this is logic that I have never, ever, ever understood.

    If the only potential evidence that you have is that baggie of drugs that they could flush down the toilet, then you don’t have the evidence to support a full-on, no-knock raid of the guy’s house in the first place. You don’t need a dozen federal agents armed for war showing up in armored vans to arrest some dude selling a bit of weed to high school kids. If him flushing some drugs down the toilet would torpedo your case, you didn’t have a case to begin with. At the very least, certainly not a case that justifies bringing in the entire COD Squad to arrest him.

    If you do have the evidence that the suspect is some high-end cartel member or something and the only safe way to arrest him is a raid, then the baggies of drugs that get flushed down the toilet are superfluous; even if he successfully flushes everything in the house down the toilet, the rest of the evidence that you used to justify the warrant in the first place should be enough to secure a conviction anyway.