• Dogiedog64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        73
        ·
        6 days ago

        I mean, sure, that’s their plan, but you can only do that so many times before you run out of money, materials, water, or places to build. If ever there was proof that there’s no forward thinking in this tech bubble, this would be it.

        • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          48
          ·
          6 days ago

          you can only do that so many times before you run out of money, materials, water, or places to build

          That’s someone else’s problem. Hopefully someone after they’re dead, but as long as they have their golden parachute, who cares?

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          True but this isn’t specific to the tech bubble. It’s a feature of capitalism. Competition forces firms to adopt shorter term horizons. If a firm has significant profit to make by focusing on the short term and it does not, its competitor would. If the profit possoble within this period is significant, having the competitor collect it runs the risk of the current firm failing, or the competitor accumulating enough for hostile takeover, among other failures. That would stop the current firm onwer from collecting profits in the future. Even if focusing on the long term is more profitable over time, firms may not survive in a competitive environment to realize long term profits. These are some of the fundamental processes that drive firms into short term horizons. With liquid asset markets there are even more immediate processes driving firms into short term planning.

          Add to that planning based mainly on prices, which don’t capture a ton of reality and you get situations like a water hungry datacenter in the desert, cause the price of water does not capture its long term availability for example.

          All of this has happened in the past, even a century ago. It’s happened and keeps happening in other industries too. For example the fossil fuel industry.

          • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            That’s more an artifact of modern corporate structure where a publicity traded entity must always be growing or it will be considered a failure.

    • kibiz0r@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      6 days ago

      Low humidity. Good for longevity of electronics, and makes the evaporative cooling more efficient. So it’s a matter of the benefits of that vs. the cost of the added heat.

    • d00phy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah, seems like a desert isn’t the best place to build something where cooling is a critical factor! Or building something that uses massive amounts of chemical treated water for cooling in a place that has had water scarcity concerns for generations, now.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I don’t understand why they even need to use up water. Water cooling does not require you to evaporate the water. You can just keep it as a closed system and reuse the water.

        If nuclear power plants can manage it which would be easy for a server farm

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            I guess water is cheep enough.

            Still kinda obnoxious though. Like they couldn’t see that the ultra high water usage was the thing that would get the most pushback from?

        • scutiger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 days ago

          Closed loop watercooling is really just air cooling with extra steps. The water is heated by the devices and cooled by a large radiator with fans. Or it’s cooled with a chiller which in turn is cooled by a radiator with fans.

          Replacing the water is the most effective (yet wasteful) way to remove the heat.

          • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            I once saw a spa that was using a liquid cooled bank of computers to heat their pool water. It involves a liquid-to-liquid heat exchanger so they’re not pumping chlorinated pool water through their servers but…I wish we did more of that. Server farms are a source of heat, lots of other things need heat.

          • d00phy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            To a point, yes. While you’re still using air to cool the water, I think it’s still a little more efficient than blindly keeping the server room at a low-ish temperature.

            • scutiger@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              6 days ago

              Keeping the server room cool is just using an air conditioner which is cooled by a radiator with a fan, and then using that cooled air to cool another radiator with a fan. Every step is a loss of efficiency.

              The main advantage of water loops is that you get to use a different form factor for the radiator and fan by moving it away from the source of heat and aren’t limited by the case dimensions.

    • xylol@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 days ago

      They building a new data center in the bay area California that is struggling for water all the time. But its OK they are building it upstream towards the reservoir so they can get first dibs

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            I’d much rather have underwater data centers. A floating data center seems like a massive eyesore and you’d need to run cables out there.

            If you build one underground near the shore and then channel water in from the ocean, it should be much less intrusive.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 days ago

                Right, by “near the shore” I meant a land-based facility with access to sea water. Heated exhaust water could also be used in a local desalinization plant to produce fresh water for maximum efficiency.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          seawater would probably corrode whatever storage system they have in there overtime, all that biological material, chemicals and gunk.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Sure. A lot of that can be filtered out, but there will be corrosion with whatever heat transfer system they use. However, seawater is free, pretty consistently cool temperature (esp. in the Pacific), and is plentiful, so replacing some heat exchange components shouldn’t be overly burdensome.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          It’s not like they’re dunking the electronics in the water. They just need to filter it enough it doesn’t clog up the system and run it in a closed loop.

          If I can have a closed loop with a reservoir for my home PC, motherfucking Amazon can build a water storage tank for their cooling.

          • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            6 days ago

            But that would require large capital investments that negatively impacts earnings reports.

            Much better to screw over the people by taking their water for free.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            Sure, but that means more space to allow for cooling the water so it can be reused. If you can cycle it w/ “unlimited” cool water from the ocean, it can be a lot more compact, and heated waste water could potentially be used by a desalinization plant to improve freshwater output.

          • xylol@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Nuclear plants do that with lakes, they suck in cool water from one end and dump out the hot water at the other so that it can cool down by the time it circulates back in

        • xylol@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Its an amazon data center in Gilroy, been in the works for a long time but they recently put up the development signs so I think now that they ran the new water lines a like a year ago they are ready to break ground

          • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 days ago

            They don’t even have enough water for the garlic anymore, and that’s the crop equivalent of a fucking lizard :(

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      Said in another comment, our deserts are tectonically stable and free of natural disasters. If you want redundant DCs, picking one on the desert is a good bet.

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah, all we got is man made tragedy of the commons disasters where the data centers deplete not only the water for humans, but the water for the data centers. Poof, no more data.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’m more worried about humans draining our aquifers that took thousands, even millions, of years to fill. That water is no more replaceable than oil.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      its also colder at night, because the desert doesnt retain heat much? in places like vegas its hot, because the asphalt and concrete absorbs heat.

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    138
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Good. This whole thing was stupid when the local government and utilities keep telling us little people to conserve water because, well we’re in a 113 degree desert with a complete lack of water due to climate change and they wanted to do this bullshit.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Have you tried collecting the condensation off the glass? If you use that to wash your armpits you can go an extra day before you shower so Jeff Bezos can make numbers go up in his theoretical money.

      Edit: “Comical” thought. There is less than $2.5 trillion in cash circulating.

      That wouldn’t cover 20 people net worth in a country of near 350,000,000.

        • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yeah, man, Bezos has tens of billions, if not hundreds! He could support the development of something that breaks the fundamental rules of physics EASILY!

          • Taleya@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            He can go develop me a liquid nitro cooling setup.

            Use so many fans he can power a wind farm

            Shove his servers up his bum

            Honestly i’m fine with any of the above

      • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I doubt a microchip that doesn’t need cooling, while still calculating reasonably fast, is possible.

      • Fontasia@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        Computers use electricity to do math. The more electricity you have, the more math you can do. In order to do the math, the electricity is handled in a way that outputs heat. Unfortunately, the most reliable, cost effective and plentiful materials that allow electricity to do a lot of math also get heavily impacted by heat.

        • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          modern cpus has an energy density on par with nuclear power plant cores.

          they need cooling, money cant break physics.

  • Fontasia@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    5 days ago

    Remember that time that Microsoft sunk a data center in the ocean, proved this was cost effective, was reliable and could scale? And now it’s been five years and nothing happened? Yeah that was annoying.

    Anyway their site of glowing press releases is still up for some reason

    • Zanathos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 days ago

      It worked well until there was a component failure, requiring a whole farm to be taken down to replace said failed components. This is why they dropped the project.

        • Zanathos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 days ago

          I’m sure they did, and they wouldn’t take the farm down until there was X% failure, but the amount of time and effort it took to perform those repairs made it unfeasible.

          • Jhex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            you don’t need to jump off a building to research gravity…

            the specific issue that is claimed to have made the entire project unviable is easily spotted a mile away

            • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              How are you going to evaluate long term effects without practical experiments? They clearly have the money and its much easier and efficient to launch a real MVP than to design a complex set of simulations and tests.

  • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 days ago

    This is a good showcase of how a few individuals can leverage power to fend off massive interests. For the good of the public even, in this instance.

    • Glytch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      Also a good showcase on why you should care about your local elections. Vote for people who will protect your interests, like these folks.

    • Natanael@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      85
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Evaporative cooling needs less water mass and less surface area for the same cooling effect. They could simply use bigger heat sinks outside the building and have a bigger water cooling system to make it closed loop, but they don’t want to do that.

        • StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          57
          ·
          6 days ago

          Cheap land, dry air is good for evaporative cooling, and many arid areas have a surprising amount of ground water. It ultimately comes down to being the cheapest option, not the smartest or best option.

          • Vandals_handle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            6 days ago

            Externalization of cost, the environment and community bears the cost instead of the corporation. Privatize the profits, externalize the costs.

          • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            6 days ago

            So how long to the billionaires have that entire city council replaced with people who are in their pocket and will vote for its passing?

              • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                22
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                Trump will have them arrested on terrorism charges in a month…after a totally coincidental delivery of a golden idol to trump, from bezos

                edit I said this as a joke, and later found Apple recently gifted Trump a golden idol.

                God I miss when satire was silliness, and not psychic future sight.

        • Taldan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          6 days ago

          Because the local and state governments in those deserts keep promising them unlimited water for nearly free

          • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            Then local governments need be strung up. Tar and feathered and hung from the largest tree in the state.

        • Fidgetting@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          6 days ago

          Two more reasons not yet mentioned:

          It is close to a population center (Phoenix) keeping latency low to customers. Getting customers off the public Internet quickly and into your private network fast is best for a lot of reasons.

          Cheap and abundant solar power. Data centers are extremely power hungry and power lines are expensive so companies like Amazon almost always secure abundant power rights before building. Google built their first data center in The Dalles Oregon because an aluminum smelter had gone belly up and left a bunch of capacity unclaimed in a local hydroelectric dam.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          6 days ago

          In addition to the other answers;

          America’s deserts are tectonically stable and don’t experience natural disasters. If you want your data and/or compute running in two regions for redundancy, somewhere in the desert is a good choice for one of your DCs.

        • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          Fewer hurricanes out there, and other natural disasters as well. I don’t know how tuscon is seismically, but otherwise it has a lot of lowere risks from nature, probably

        • 3abas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          6 days ago

          Right, that’s what they said. For a closed loop, because it’s less “effective”, you need a much larger system. It’s more expensive to build and requires a much larger footprint and corporations like Amazon would rather save a penny than do anything to reduce their harm.

    • innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      6 days ago

      They absolutely can run closed loop. It does not cool as well as evaporative cooling (it takes MASSIVE heat to evaporate water) but it can work if designed right with large system capacity and big radiators. Trouble is it’s likely more expensive than pissing away the water and we know all that matters is bottom line.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        usually the water doesn’t cool down fast enough

        …in the time chosen. If the planet can get down to 13c overnight, I bet Skippy’s relatively smaller data centre can get down sooner with a proper loop.

        I know it’s hard finding a good spot of flat land now that the choicest spots have all been fracked for methane and are no longer stable - thanks, ‘green’ energy shysters! - but what else were ya gonna do with all that space under the solar panels?

        By-product? Free showers for the homeless with that waste heat. Yay?

  • biofaust@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I guess that , unlike some famous people in “Phoenix Valley”, the people in Tucson did not forget “the white man’s greed”.

    Kudos to them!

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Well fine, guess I’ll have to make my obese fart videos the old fashioned way. Anyone seen my kimchi?