• Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    There is a reason for declining child birth numbers… it has everything to do with more people knowing what they are really getting into.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      15 hours ago

      And that everyone’s too damn poor. Babysitter? Not on average wages! No one wants to give up all of their time and money for kids they might not be able to provide for.

      • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        14 hours ago

        There are people giving 100% of their paychecks for childcare and the spouse pays for everything else.

        That is a failure of the US and birth rates won’t improve until that changes.

          • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            Low birth rates deplete the work force in the long term. Creates issues where tax revenue is low and cost of social programs and healthcare are extremely high because there are so many people at retirement age and beyond. Birth rates at a minimum should be stagnant.

            • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              19
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              deplete the work force

              Its spelled “increase the negotiating power of labor”

              tax revenues are low

              Tax billionaires out if existence. Or re-organize society so we work somewhat efficiently and don’t spend 90% of allblabor doing useless corpo bosswank.

              See, this is only a problem gor evil exploitative oligarch shit heels. Benefits humans very much.

    • bunchberry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Well if there was public daycare to take the stress off of parents who couldn’t deal with it then it wouldn’t be as big of an issue.

    • LousyCornMuffins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah we had to raise our siblings. Ain’t raising another generation without being paid for it. It’s why we work in education.

    • grindemup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I don’t really follow your train of thought. People would have been just as aware (if not more, due to the prevalence of multigenerational households) of this in the past as they are now, no?

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        In the past people didn’t have access to a device with endless information about how rough it is the raise kids. Instead they had other local parents as a source, and those parents just wanted company in thier misery.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          When I was a kid we used to just get thrown outside along with all the other kids and told not to come back until lunch time.

          We used to get up to all sorts no one cared. At one point someone’s dad took us all to the beach which was about an hour away, we all just got in this strangers car (never met him before) and went to the beach. I don’t remember my parents been even remotely bothered by that when they found out.