• Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    A little besides the point, but still: Who would even count lethal doses in the first place? Is that just a scare tactic? Surely they would know enough about the drugs they are enforcing against to know the average or typical dose?

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The ATF once seized a shipment of airsoft guns by claiming “they could be modified to shoot real bullets”.

      The ATF knows how guns work. They know that’s an absurd thing to say. They don’t make these claims to actually protect anyone.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I think it’s about figuring out how many charges to throw at the guys, not that it matters because it’s water. LOL.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Surely they would know enough about the drugs

      lol these people are fash… don’t know, don’t care. Just here to put people in cages.

    • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That’s some weak-ass homeopathic heroin, only 5X / 2C (I have no idea if 2.5C would sound nonsensical to a homeopath). Gotta dilute that a lot more times, that’s how you make it more potent. Effing 19th century pseudoscience.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It kinda sounds like those drums were previously used for heroin or the cops had just kinda framed them entirely by tossing something in water drums.

  • Edgarallenpwn@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I grew up in a house with hippie grandparents. When I got older we would always have fun laughing at drug busts stating how much money the agency said was worth. This is just a shame.

  • npcknapsack@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    My goodness. Well, folks, we finally did it. We convinced the people in power that dihydrogen monoxide really is deadly.

  • rarsamx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Let’s start a conspiracy theory. Although these days everything can be true:

    It was heroine but someone in the police department syphoned the heroine, replaced with water and agreed with the defendant that they’ll get a slap on the wrist if they followed along.

    So, now, someone has some heroine on sale!

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Definitely not homeopathy.

          Unless it’s the peanut’s memory that you’re absorbing, and that the less peanut that’s in the final result that you take is, the more powerful the results become.

          Because that’s the stupidity of homeopathy.

        • Null User Object@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          52
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s cool, but it’s not homeopathy. That’s micro dosing.

          For it to be homeopathy, the peanut proteins would need to be so diluted in water, that hundreds of Olympic swimming pools full of the solution would be unlikely to contain a single molecule of peanut protein. All that’s left is the water infused with 👋👋PeAnUt EnErGy👋👋.

          • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            31
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Micro-dosing, so extreme homeopathy.

            Edit, it’s actually less than microdosing:

            eat the protein equivalent of one 40th of a peanut every day for two weeks

            • Null User Object@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              41
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Micro-dosing, so extreme homeopathy.

              No, the other way around.

              In micrososing and with this peanut thing, there are actually molecules of the thing you’re taking in the solution, just very small amounts.

              In homeopathy, there isn’t any. At all. Zilch. None. Squat. Bupkiss. Nada. Elvis has left the building. Who? Dave? … Dave’s not here. This parrot is no more, it has ceased to be, it is bereft of life, it rests in peace. This is an ex-parrot.

              • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                26
                ·
                2 days ago

                I don’t know enough to argue about it, but I do know that there are some poisons that will kill you if you smell it.

                • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Just literally read like a two sentence definition of “homeopathy” on Wikipedia or something, because you’re literally confusing it with everything.

                • Null User Object@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  20
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/another-damning-homeopathy-report/

                  Conclusion

                  Homeopathy is based on magical thinking. It does not have even the barest toe-hold in science or reality. In spite of this it has been extensively researched for its clinical effects. While most of this research is of poor quality, there is some reasonably high-quality research, which consistently shows that homeopathy does not work.

                  The extremely low prior probability combined with the negative clinical evidence is devastating to homeopathy. There is simply no rational justification for further investment in this pre-scientific and disproved notion. We do not need further research. No government should fund homeopathy, pay for homeopathic treatments, fund research, or even approve homeopathy in any official capacity. This means that homeopaths should not be licensed, and homeopathic products should not be approved.

                  And yet homeopathy still enjoys the support of most governments. This is largely based on a misunderstanding among the general public as to what homeopathy is, combined with lobbying by homeopaths and supporters of unscientific medicine.

                  Science clearly needs a stronger lobby.

  • whosepoopisonmybutt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    2 days ago

    Doing a little napkin math here, that’s about a half an ounce of heroin mixed into 385 gallons of water.

    That seems more like the 55 gallon drums had previously been filled with heroin, but were drained and refilled with water, and just a little residue was leftover.

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Or a false positive to begin with in the cops don’t want to admit they made a mistake. False positives are way higher sometimes with Trace Amounts. Plus the drug testing Labs try to give the results the cops want.

      • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I doubt a false positive here. Clearly something weird about the cargo to begin with - what the hell else are a couple of dudes going across states in a uhaul doing with 55 gallon drums of water? The water wars aren’t set to start for another few decades, I think. Not really a commodity that needs to be shipped, and if it were I doubt it would be shipped by uhaul.

        I mean seriously, just look at the situation and analyze it with some common sense. ACAB, but not every single interaction with them is a conspiracy.

        • hector@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I think it definitely warrants independent testing of the barrels. It seems pretty odd that the police would be tipped off about barrels with Trace Amounts of heroin in them. Given the authorities’ penchent for not admitting when they made a mistake.

          It is quite odd otherwise.

      • null@lemmy.nullspace.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Plus the drug testing Labs try to give the results the cops want.

        Source? That’s a strong claim…

        • hector@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          When State drug labs are run by the state police running tests for police you will get that. For instance any amount of THC in the blood can get an impaired driving charge. Unless it is a legalized state in which case it minuscule tiny amount that could have resulted from smoking 14 week days ago is still enough. With the smallest amounts, one nanogram per milliliter, false positives are as high as 40%, but when they go into court they don’t say that. They make it sound like this is what it is science. We could speak of a dozen different types of junk science they have been involved in as well. Like hair analysis.

            • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              There was a pretty famous case of this in the Boston area recently(last decade or so) and there is a Netflix series about it.

            • hector@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              If you need a source to explain the inherent conflicts of interest and having the Police lab run by the state police for the police, it would not make a difference anyway. Likewise since you are unaware, and keep scorn on the idea, it shows that you either do not follow the news very closely, or are dishonest about it. Either way think what you want.

              • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 hours ago

                I agree with the principal idea, but if this is as much of a prevailing issue as you’re making it out to be, it shouldn’t be too hard to produce even a single solid source beyond your own convictions of, “Well that’s just how the world works!”

                • hector@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  It’s common knowledge, does somebody asked politely I might have gone to the trouble, or you could just search for Crime Lab people get caught cheating and find pages of results. Or you can search for any number of junk Sciences like hair test analysis. Or not I don’t care what you think. Someone coming from a place of it is preposterous the police would do anything improper is not worth talking to, and as such good day.

              • null@lemmy.nullspace.lol
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                1 day ago

                Not sure why you felt the need to come back and double-down on having nothing of substance to back up your bold claim whatsoever, but thanks.

                • hector@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Because you are purposely being obtuse here because you have an ax to grind defending the police apparently.

                  That State Police labs are biased in favor of the police is common knowledge and doesn’t need a source.

                  I don’t know why I would waste time with someone that heaps scorn on the idea that the cops would be anything less than forthright.

          • null@lemmy.nullspace.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            For instance any amount of THC in the blood can get an impaired driving charge. Unless it is a legalized state in which case it minuscule tiny amount that could have resulted from smoking 14 week days ago is still enough.

            Sure, that’s just the law.

            With the smallest amounts, one nanogram per milliliter, false positives are as high as 40%, but when they go into court they don’t say that.

            I don’t think the lab techs attend the court cases to provide details about how testing works…

            If you know that, you don’t think a decent defense lawyer knows that?

            What I asked for was a source for your bold claim that:

            drug testing Labs try to give the results the cops want.

            Interesting that you’d downvote me just for asking for a source for your strong claim though…

      • Jay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        with an LD50 exceeding 90,000 mg/kg (90 g/kg) body weight in rats; drinking six liters in three hours has caused the death of a human

        Doesn’t say the size of the human but guestimating 3 gallons should be enough for most people, would make that 130 lethal doses or so from 385 gallons of water.

      • Ava@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Let’s call that 1500 liters of water. Assuming that drinking 10 liters of water in a short timeframe will almost certainly kill you somehow or another, 150 doses?

  • 60d@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    These were always full of water, I promise.

    Jokes aside, isn’t all tapwater just diluted heroin when you think about it?

  • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    2 days ago

    Okay, I really want to know why these guys were transporting barrels of water with 0.001% heroin in them. Was it a con? A test run? Barrel re-use? A case of cops not having heroin on hand to frame them?

    I’m just baffled as to why you’d be hauling around eight barrels of water and how the trace amounts of heroin got in them.

    • sqgl@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Is it too far fetched that the cops got rich by replacing the heroin with water? Initial suspects would be happy to go along with the lie just to avoid life in jail.

    • cenzorrll@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, if you need to catch a snitch, you set up a few false operations. Tell each person something different and see which one is busted.

    • expatriado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      2 days ago

      0.001% should had been bellow the threshold of any reasonable test, otherwise all of us are carrying drugs

    • Fondots@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      EDIT: I mathed wrong, see comments below.

      Just my 2¢ as a complete nobody who likes to think about stuff and Google some numbers, take it for what it’s worth.

      Of course the numbers here are all very fuzzy, but if we take the inaccurate initial estimate of “millions” of lethal doses at face value (which you probably shouldn’t, these estimates always seem to be massively inflated,) .001% of 2 million (the smallest number you can really call “millions”) is still 2000 lethal doses. Probably several times that in actual doses since most addicts aren’t looking to outright kill themselves.

      I don’t know the physics/chemistry of how heroin dissolves into water, let alone how pure the heroin involved was or any of the other factors that would play into this, so these numbers are probably gonna be way off, but 8 55gal drums of water is 440 gallons. .001% of that is .44 gallons of heroin. And I believe that would theoretically be a solid block of heroin with that volume, not a loose power where some of that volume is air.

      That’s an upper bound, because that’s not how volume works when you dissolve stuff, s let’s go ahead and assume the actual amount of heroin is ¼ of that (based on nothing but a wild guess, easy math and an assumption that I’m wildly overestimating) so .11 gallons, (1.76 cups, a 2.94 inch cube, 416.395 ml)

      With the amount of googling I was willing to do, I couldn’t find the density of heroin, but anhydrous morphine is apparently 1.32 g/cm³, so let’s roll with that. 1.32×416.395 = 549.6414g (a little over a pound for my fellow Americans)

      Let’s go ahead and call that 500g or ½kg to make math easy and further account for me probably overestimating things earlier.

      A little googling tells me the value of heroin is between $10,000-$100,000/kg, so for half of that we’re looking at $5,000-$50,000 of heroin in those drums (assuming that all of my many assumptions weren’t too far off-base)

      So for that kind of money, assuming they have the means to recover the heroin at the other end (industrial freeze dryer maybe? Not sure what the best method would be,) I could definitely see it being worthwhile to have a couple mooks rent a u haul to smuggle heroin from point a to point b this way.

      Also gives you a little insurance against the driver stealing any of it en route. It’s not easy to just walk off with a full barrel, and if they siphoned some off, they probably wouldn’t have the means to recover it, and even if they did it wouldn’t be much.

      One of the barrels tested negative, and I kind of suspect they didn’t just put in a barrel of plain water for shits and giggles, so I have a hunch that the plan was to dilute the heroin down to below the detection threshold for whatever field test kit cops usually have, so if they got stopped they’d just say they have barrels of water, which would be weird but probably not illegal, but either they just had bad luck and the cops had a better batch of test strips than usual, or someone fucked up dividing the heroin between the barrels.

      Again, take that all for what it’s worth.

      • the_mighty_kracken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        Someone else here said the total amount of heroin in those barrels was less than half an ounce. That sounds like they were reusing dirty barrels for some other purpose, not transporting heroin. I have no idea why someone would move barrels of water around in a truck, but I don’t think it is illegal.

        • Fondots@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          EDIT: I mathed wrong, see comments below.

          I also saw that comment, all they cited was “napkin math” for that number, which is really all I’ve done here, so both of our answers should be taken with a big grain of salt.

          They might know a lot more than I do and started with better numbers and used a better methodology, or they might be talking totally out of their ass and just picked a number that sounded about right to them, I can’t say. If they want to look over my math, they’re more than welcome to, that’s why I wrote it out, so that people can fact-check me, I very well might be wrong. And if they they explain their napkin math, I’ll look that over as well.

          And to just do my math another way to back up the idea of it being more than a half ounce, let’s go by weight. A gallon weighs about 8lbs, x 55 × 8 = 3520lbs of water, or 1596.645kg. 1596.645 × .001 = 1.596645kg of heroin by weight. And let’s go ahead and assume I’m being overly optimistic about those weights, the purity of heroin, and all of the other science involved, and go ahead and use that cut that by 75% again like I did the first time, which gets us to about .4kg of heroin, not too far off from the .5kg I estimated the first time, and in either case significantly more than a half ounce.

          EDIT: also, I just watched the video included in the article. A lot of the screenshots and such there seem to be talking about fentanyl while the article says heroin, so there seems to be some crossed wires here. Fentanyl is of course much more potent, so if the substance in the barrels was in fact fentanyl that would also be worth considering, ½oz of fentanyl would still plenty for a few dozen lethal doses, still a far cry from “millions” but it’s something else that may be worth taking into consideration.

          • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            1596.645 × .001 = 1.596645kg of heroin by weight

            That’s 0.1%, not 0.001%

            0.001% of 440 gallons is 0.5632 fl oz (or just over 16ml out of 1,666 liters)

            • Fondots@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 days ago

              See, that’s why I post my math so someone can double check me, I’m just some assholes one the internet doing math while I’m standing around staring at my washer waiting for it to finish

              • I’d really just calculated it the way decryptor did but the article also said only 7 of the barrels actually tested positive.

                I figured most things have a density not all that far from water. This isn’t lead or tungsten or helium we’re talking about. Also the their .001% value is probably also just ballpark.

                • Fondots@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  You know, I’ve gotten a lot of mileage out of that same rule of thumb, and it hasn’t steered me wrong yet. It feels like it shouldn’t work, when it comes up people are always skeptical of it, but the results are hard to argue with.

    • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Maybe they already removed the heroin and a little bit leaked into the water. Could have been a heroin “core” inside the barrels to fool dogs.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      May have been a bad smuggling operation? Mix it with water, ship the water, then boil off the water leaving the heroin? Too bad doing that ruins the heroin.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s like 6,000 pounds of water for a few ounces of heroin. There equipment is either off by a factor of ten or more and it’s contamination or probably more likely the cop sprinkled some in.

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    So how much of that would you have to drink to get high? Can you get high from drinking it?

    Also

    The case dates back to January 2024, when four men were arrested at a Motel 6 in Tigard after investigators said they were transporting a massive shipment of liquid heroin from Yakima, Washington, to the Portland area.

    Officials said at the time that the men were driving a rented U-Haul truck with eight 55-gallon barrels inside and that seven of the barrels tested positive for heroin. Six men were eventually charged in connection with the case.

    What the fuck were they doing driving around barrels of water?