• Dicska@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      As a kid, being indoctrinated early on by fairy tales with knights, then watching action films later on, I kind of understand, since you only know about the romanticised side.

      As an adult, by the time you’re supposed to understand the endless pain, suffering, atrocities, needless death of millions (even one single person), the barbarity of trying to resolve conflicts with violence, the immense sadness and sacrifice that comes with war… putting it lightly, I don’t get war lovers.

      But fuck me, I fucking LOVE to learn about the technological advancements, smart solutions, brilliant engineering (hey, even strategies) that came with those, from the first stone tools to holographic sights and radar camouflaging. On one hand, it’s rather sad that we could only develop technologies due to threatening violence or trying to crush others. On the other hand, without wars, we would probably still be amputating limbs due to infections we can either prevent or treat now (thanks to field medicine development), and a civilisation that doesn’t develop its own weapons (since why would they, they are peaceful) won’t have fun when running into one that isn’t as friendly.

      (And for that reason, YT already thinks I’m a WW2 nerd)

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Mm, I’d dispute that we developed technology only as a result of war. Humans are naturally curious. We would develop technology no matter what

        But it is true that the trajectory would be different, and there’s be differences in investment levels as well, but that’s more of a symptom of what our societies value

    • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think there are some ways that are defendable (like those obsessed with WW2 only because they don’t want it to happen here, like Robert Evans of Cool Zone Media), but I can’t think of a war I was obsessed with… maybe if you include Star Wars? I was a huge fan as a child and I do consider myself still a fan now, though I’ve grown to know what I like about it is just a standard hero saves the day against stronger enemy fantasy. The people who like and defend the empire has always worried me. Felt pretty fascist apologetic.

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The Long War

    it’s part of a setting that I’m worldbuilding. I keep lying to myself and saying that one day I’ll actually write the book. Think star wars, but with a pinch more cyberpunk, an entire shaker of grimdark, a not insignificant amount of nsfw content.

    It’s my life’s work, and I’ve got jack shit to show for it.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s a little of both. Humanity is kind of obsessed with Wars in general, and a lot of our history is written to reflect that. So you almost can’t have one without the other.

    • TheRealKuni@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Why do you think Argentina decided to try to take the islands? It’s not like they were historically Argentine, right?

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It has something to do with some popular Argentinian cowboy that was governor of the Falklands for a while a long time ago

        What the people that actually live in the Falklands want is obviously ignored by the “historical sentiment is more important than what living people want” crowd.

      • Caveman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Navy seal copypasta style

        What the fuck did you just fucking say about Argentina’s claim to the Falklands, you little shit? I’ll have you know sovereignty passed from Spain to Argentina at independence in 1816 under uti possidetis juris, and Argentina formally claimed the islands in 1820, followed by confirmation and effective occupation from 1826 to 1833. You are nothing to me but another loudmouth denying that history. I will wipe out your arguments with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can toss around “self-determination” like it overrides territorial integrity? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am lining up decades of Argentine protests — 1833, 1841, 1849, 1884, 1888, 1908, 1927, 1933, 1946 and every UN complaint thereafter — and your weak rebuttals are being traced and exposed, so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that buries the myth that British de facto rule since 1833 was anything but an illegal act of force. You’re intellectually dead, kid. I can be anywhere in the argument, anytime, and I can dismantle your “transplanted population” claim in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just by citing principle: the islanders are a transplanted population of British character and nationality, not a separate people under external self-determination doctrine, and thus that doctrine does not apply here. Not only am I extensively trained in international law rhetoric, but I have access to the entire arsenal of historical facts — uti possidetis, effective occupation, the continental-shelf argument from the 1958 Convention — and I will use them to their full extent to wipe your miserable case off the face of the debate, you little bitch. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” dismissal of Argentina’s legal and historical claims was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over your shaky precedent and you will drown in it. You’re fucking argued out, kiddo.

        Jokes aside, Argentina has had a claim on it for ages and we’re slowly gaining influence for a long time until they decided to invade and actually take it. They though the Brits wouldn’t care about a rock on the other side of the world but turns out Thatcher needed a win and got everyone riled up.

        Nobody cared until Argentina invaded but now majority of the population is British military and British workers that support the military and whatnot. It was won with British blood that’s still in living memory so no way people are giving it up to Argentina.

        If Argentina would have just slowly settled the island, support it, have the government do a referendum about unifying with Argentina it would have probably worked but instead they just have the claim.

        • Flax@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Ironically I think the British could have been persuaded to hand it over to Argentina at some point. Kinda like with Hong Kong (although part of that was under a 99 year lease, but notably that wasn’t the whole territory either. Also I think the British could have just told them they weren’t the Qing dynasty if they really wanted to keep it)

          • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I mean it was literally what was happening. The military dictatorship acted like a bunch of fucking idiots and fucked it up completely.

            The Falklands are British. 1) Argentina lost them in the most recent war 2) The people living there and ant to be British because at the moment, Argentina sucks.

            • Flax@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              One of the funniest things about the referendum is that the 3 who voted against British rule didn’t necessarily want Argentinian rule- they could have wanted independence.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      feddit.uk

      Have some class man. You destroyed their national identity, they can’t stop obsessing over that shit, you don’t need to rub salt in the wound.

  • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    War? Haven’t seen one in years … Oh that? Special military operation… This one? That’s a “conflict” but I can see your mistake.

    Genocide? Sorry not familiar with that word

    • Ŝan@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      <sigh> I miss þe good old “police action.” Especially when it was overseas, unlike now.