Summary

Former vice presidential nominee Tim Walz criticized Trump for economic chaos while taking personal responsibility for the situation during an MSNBC interview.

“We wouldn’t be in this mess if we’d have won the election — and we didn’t,” Walz told Chris Hayes. He called Trump the “worst possible business executive” and praised the Wall Street Journal’s editorial criticizing Trump’s tariff war.

Walz emphasized Democrats must offer something better, not just criticize Trump. Recently, he acknowledged a leadership void in the Democratic Party and admitted spending too much time combatting Trump’s false claims about immigrants.

  • GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Not you walz but the Democratic party. Send out 19 billion to Israel while our kids were hungry in school.

      • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yeah yeah, continue giving excuses to the Democrats for not being as bad as the Republicans. They’re lucky they have supporters like you who will just take whatever bullshit they give out whenever they try and emulate the Republicans. Clearly you’re not satisfied with how right leaning the political system in America already is, you want them to go all the way. Considering how spineless their supporters are in making them shift their policies, I can see why they think it’s completely fine for them to offer mediocrity in the face of fascism.

      • Longpork3@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        So the answer is to keep slowly sliding into fascism with the ‘slightly less evil’ party, rather than forcing their hand in the hope of democratic reforms which stop the slide?

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    So it seems like it’s going to come down between Gavin The Transphobe and Tim Walz for 2028, and honestly Tim Walz is who I learn more towards, dude feels like a second coming of Bernie.

    Meanwhile Gavin started out in 2025 being the strong man who stared Trump down, but he not only folded, he sold out transpeople.

    Anyone who carries water for the “Transpeople are crazy and giving them basic human rights is going too far” is a danger to us all

    • Mangoholic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      That’s only if Trump gives up his power after his 4 years… very unlikely. He will just start a war and impose martial law or just let the supreme court add a law that removes the limit, like they already proposed and if that doesn’t work, voter fraud with all the government officials getting fired is easy peasy. I think it’s over there is no comeback other than a bloody and voilent civil war or fascism until imperial collapse.

    • freely1333@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I wouldn’t even vote for Gavin and it’s not the trans shit he just did it’s that he stands for nothing and is just playing hang out with fascists. I’d rather trump tbh

  • RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It’s so obvious the democratic party lied about Biden to get through the nomination phase and used the fact that the money already donated for the campaign was specifically to Biden or Harris and would not have easily been given over to any other new candidate. You do have to wonder, especially after how Trump was greeted by them, just what actually happened here. The fact is that the truth about Bidens condition should have been known, he should have decided not to run, and the Democratic party should’ve had a real primary for real candidates and new ideas. Tim Walz was as bad of a VP pick as Tim Kaine. The white guy as VP to shore up the right wing vote is a total myth. Biden was kind of the first one, then Tim Kaine, then Tim Walz. It just doesn’t work. Neither will Newsoms podcast attempt at finding common ground which he hopes will translate into moderate votes. Democrats really have no clue just how bad things are about to get…

    • ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      the truth about Bidens condition should have been known

      It was known, and lots of us were shouting from the rooftops about it, But Democrats and liberals did everything they could to shut us up, accuse us of being Russian bots, accuse us of helping to get Trump elected, when it was liberals that got Trump elected by ignoring the people that saw every single sign

    • uuldika@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised if Newsom pulls a Tulsi Gabbard and switches sides. He had Charlie Kirk (of TPUSA) on his podcast where he “completely aligned” with him on trans rights (i.e. eradicating us), then had Steve Bannon on. That’s a bit much even for the Liz Cheney flank of the DNC.

      I suspect Newsom doesn’t see any future for his party, and is bailing out instead.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That’s EXACTLY what I’m expecting, when he stood up to Trump I thought he’d be alright, but the dude has basically been courting the Far Right and going all in on being as transphobic as possible.

        He’ll run the sadly profitable “I was on the Left peacefully drinking Kombucha and eating Avocado Toast like the next pink pussyhat wearing hippie, but then they went too far when they tried to tell me the Holocaust actually happened! They’ve gone completely nuts!” grift.

      • RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        In my experience, the higher up you go in both parties, you tend to sort of arrive at the same places with the same people… and most importantly, the same donors and the same money machine. That’s the great thing about the U.S. dollar really, corruption and selling Govt from Citizens United to today sort of drives the bipartisan nature of it because it all greases the wheels of the two party political machine.

        I’ve listened to several episodes of his podcast… I’ll probably continue listening but in the first episode Newsom basically kept saying he only got into college because his scores were low and he played baseball. Then he kept backing down to Charlie Kirk, Bannon, etc, while constantly saying he doesn’t know what to do and kept asking them for ideas. In the first episode, there was a moment where he said Jesus Fucking Christ or something to Charlie Kirk, which called him out on it. It’s like, the very voters he’s trying to go after will hear that and stop at the first episode. He will gain no allies on the right as he abandons the party he is supposed to believe in, along with the core values he is supposed to defend. He thinks having a podcast with right wing guests where he gets sort of transactional on the issues. Like, do you think giving up the trans in sports debate is going to win you anything when their entire side would like to see gay marriage go away entirely? While you claim to still even support that? Do these people even think any of this through?

        If Newsoms approach is the best the Democrats have to offer, then it might be game over for a very long time…

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Newsom is an amazing combination of a spineless coward and a heartless monster that if he’s the Democratic Candidate, it might be the first year I don’t vote. I will NEVER willingly put a transphobe in the White House.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      And every time you point this shit out, people will stick their fingers in their ears and say:

      You had a primary and we all picked Biden!

      Ignore that the 2016, 2020, and 2024 primaries were effectively just for show! Ignore that they argued in court they have no reason to follow democratic policies in their primaries!

      Ignore the evidence that the media hated outsiders that threatened their bank accounts and loved the ones that increased them!

      Turn off your brain and cut out your tongue, vote blue no matter who we pick for you!

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Ignore that the 2016, 2020, and 2024 primaries were effectively just for show! Ignore that they argued in court they have no reason to follow democratic policies in their primaries!

        the law literally says they don’t have to lmao, go take that up with the DNC or something.

        • yarr@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Yeah, everyone keeps bringing this up like it’s some kind of dunk, but the DNC can basically run things as they please. Don’t like it? Start another party. The party’s procedure goes back a few decades by now. People act like when Biden dropped out they did this crazy double secret turbo maneuver but the fact is the DNC can put forth whomever they want.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Gavin’s going to run more Diet Republican than any Democrat ever before and that’s going to make even my “Blue, no matter who!” ass not vote for him. I’m already thinking about staying home in '28 because Trump can’t win a third time and Gavin’s a transphobe.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s so obvious the democratic party lied about Biden to get through the nomination phase and used the fact that the money already donated for the campaign was specifically to Biden or Harris and would not have easily been given over to any other new candidate.

      the argument for this one is that the super pac was biden/harris, not any other random person, so it’s questionable whether they would’ve been able to use super pac funding at all especially at such short notice, given the technicalities of super pac funding. The majority of DNC funding, sure, but super pacs are most of the money in elections these days.

  • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    honestly, if walz had been managed competently, I think he’d have been a pretty good folksy VP candidate. especially if he’d kept up on the ‘weeeeird’ stuff.

    harris was just a terrible idea, and she didn’t even push her strengths. it’s like she, and the people who put her there, were all trying to lose.

  • WhatThaFudge@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    “We wouldn’t be in this mess if we’d have won the election — and we didn’t,”
    (Implies that if they(H&W) would have won we wouldn’t be in this mess)

    has quite the different sentiment than

    “Tim Walz says ‘we wouldn’t be in this mess’ if it wasn’t for him and Harris” (Implies its their fault we are in this mess)

    These headlines -_-

    Not that I prefer straight bias but we got conservative media calling these people cutting all of everyone’s safety nets “heroes” and this is supposed to be liberal media straight misquoting for clicks?

    We are in the worst timeline.

    • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I do blame them, though. They could have ridden the coattails of Biden’s withdrawal all the way to victory, but instead Hartis capitulated and palled around on stages with Republicans instead of Walz.

      The failure of the Democrat campaign has a lot of causes, but none more so than the failure of leadership.

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Ultimately nobody wants to touch the issue of spiraling national and global wealth inequality, but it’s destroying our economic systems and the only fix would seem to be redistributing that wealth.

        Democrats need to force their doners to make concessions to the American people in order to get voters, which goes against the interests of their doners, and they won’t get elected without the money to spend on advertising that wins elections.

        Both the Republicans and the Neolibs lead to an oligarchhy.

  • maplebar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I don’t blame Harris or Walz. I don’t even blame Biden, the senile old fool that he so clearly is.

    I blame the Americans for fucking up the most outrageously obvious binary choice in history.

    Has there ever been an election so obvious? Even during Trump vs Clinton one could almost be forgiven for giving Trump the benefit of the doubt as a “political outsider”, but by 2024 we knew exactly who this fucking guy was… The fact that people today are acting surprised and outraged about all the stuff that’s been happening during Trump’s first 1.5 months is only further proof that Americans are perhaps the dumbest amnesiacs to infest the Earth.

    Literally all we had to do was vote against Trump’s particular brand of fascism.

    But Americans are the type of people who fail a single question true or false quiz because they forgot to write their name at the top of the page, and we deserve to suffer the consequences of our collective stupidity over and over until it is bred out of us, or until our society falls. The American people allowed this to happen–and not just Trump, but everything bad that has happened over the course of American history.

    • Secluded_Serenity@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Biden, the senile old fool that he so clearly is

      That shit made me chuckle because of how true it is. Also, the way that you worded that is so perfect. Beautifully put.

    • Mandelbrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Nah it’s actually their fault. The fact that they lost when it was “the most outrageously obvious binary choice in history” shows how hard they fucked a lay-up.

      • CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I like picking random bad things that have happened in America an tieing it back to Regan. Usually it isn’t even hard.

    • laserm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The good think about the 2024 US election was that the choice was obvious to everyone who paid the littlest attention; the bad thing was that Americans chose the wrong candidate anyway.

    • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      My favourite part is how he made gains in (virtually?) all segments. It seems the economy was their number one concern too. Imagine thinking the current president was going to make the economy/their financial situation better…

      Like at some point you just need to call out the stupid.

    • LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      How dare you!? America is a DEMOCRACY, and that means we can’t be blamed for how we vote. If I vote for Trump, I’m not at fault for what happens. In fact, it’s Harris’s fault. She should have pandered to me more. I can blame her, and only one person can be at fault for something, so I’m guilt free.

      You liberals are always trying to guilt trip us leftists for letting fascists take over the government!

  • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    There’s no leadership void in the Democratic Party, it’s been Bernard Sanders for quite a while. Them denying this is to their (and everyone elses) detriment. Just run Bernie/AOC and let’s get this over with.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Nancy Pelosi is the leadership of the Democrats. And AOC was not allowed to become top house dem. They chose Gerry Atrick Connely instead.

      AOC and Bernie will never be allowed to do anything besides sheepdogging progressives into the Democratic party. And at this point it appears they are fully on board with that.

      • SeriousMite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Pelosi, Schumer, Jeffries may control the official party apparatus, but when it comes to communicating and connecting with constituents and energizing the base, AOC and Bernie are clearly the only ones acting as opposition leaders.

      • CyboNinja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        At some point they have to fall in line and follow orders. Or fade into obscurity. It’s a truly shitty system. One long overdue for a big reset…

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Instead of frittering away the last few months of his presidential term, Biden should have just resigned and allowed Harris to take over his role. She could have pivoted way to the left without having to undermine Biden’s agenda and that would have really sent a clearer message to the democratic base.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      honestly that may have helped strategically, i don’t think biden was “out the door” by that point, but it very well may have been a good look and given some needed press time to harris.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      If voting patterns of America ever showed something consistently, it is the fact that shifting to the left in any sense never works. You can sometimes entice the public with enough vigor so they don’t focus on your politics, but outside of very rare cases, shifting to the right consistently brings some votes, and shifting to the left consistently brings loses.
      And no amount of social media posts was able to change it weirdly enough.
      It might have something to do with consistent anti-voting narrative of a lot of the vocal leftists, coupled with their bafflement that they consistently don’t get a desired outcome.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        If voting patterns of America ever showed something consistently, it is the fact that shifting to the left in any sense never works.

        Sounds like a great excuse to only move right.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I did vote. For harris.

            Your party responds to all sensory input by moving right and punching left. You assume anyone who has a problem with that must be a nonvoter.

      • LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That’s ridiculous. Kamala appealed right and she got fewer votes. We abstained and let Trump win to show her that.

        In 2028, Obama is gonna have to appeal to the left in order to win against Trump.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It might have something to do with consistent anti-voting narrative of a lot of the vocal leftists, coupled with their bafflement that they consistently don’t get a desired outcome.

        i think its primarily age demographics, and the fact that the voter base is stupid, i.e. votes for the wrong people.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The voters deserve a lot of blame here.

    You can lead a horse to water…

    Any ADULT can easily see that politicians are going to be imperfect, and no single candidate is going to align 100% with your stance. Demanding that they do, or else you’ll vote for literally the worst possible option, or sit out, or vote a “protest” vote, all so that someone, somewhere will “learn” something is just fucking childish and stupid. And this will be continue to be true no matter how many times the Tone Police show up to admonish people about blaming voters. Sorry, not sorry: I blame the voters.

    • ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Harris could have aligned with 99% of what I wanted, but that 1% was OK with genocide, and that should have been a red line for anyone.

    • Kayday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      I agree, I’m also happy that people like Walz seem to want to give people a better option, making a protest vote even less appealing.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Nobody demanded that Harris align 100% with their stance; they demanded that she not be an absolute pile of shit of a candidate. That distinction matters.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        she was actually pretty ok? The one thing that was bad about her was the israel stance, which is like maybe 5% of the voter base that ACTUALLY cares about that enough.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          So first a lot more than 5% of the Democrat voter base cares about Gaza. I won’t get into the weeds, but there.

          The one thing that was bad about her was the israel stance,

          No? She would’ve won at least two or three swing states if that was the case. Her economic policy (or lack thereof, more accurately) was horrible. She dedicated the final two months of her campaign almost exclusively to “Trump bad” rhetoric while not promising to do anything for her constituents. I mean this woman was asked what she’d do different from Biden economically and she said “nothing comes to mind”. Status quo politics just won’t cut it in this day and age.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            So first a lot more than 5% of the Democrat voter base cares about Gaza. I won’t get into the weeds, but there.

            i’m talking about the voter base that actually cares enough to influence their vote over it. I’m sure if you polled the public it;s like 90% or higher who care about it at all, like 40% support israel, 60% against israel, and like 5% of those is “fuck israel i hope it burns to the ground and that palestine re conglomerates into israel” type of people.

            No? She would’ve won at least two or three swing states if that was the case. Her economic policy (or lack thereof, more accurately) was horrible.

            “her economic policy was bad” bro, did you see ANYTHING that trump said? Literally an irrelevant argument. Especially now.

            She dedicated the final two months of her campaign almost exclusively to “Trump bad” rhetoric while not promising to do anything for her constituents.

            I remember her talking about a lot of things she and walz were going to do, that was like a pretty big deal. Was their entire plan, not all of it was great, but it existed, unlike trump.

            I mean this woman was asked what she’d do different from Biden economically and she said “nothing comes to mind”. Status quo politics just won’t cut it in this day and age.

            yeah and? Biden had pretty good economic policy? Aside from the whole covid thing, but you have no choice there, unless you want a global recession, more like a depression. Again, trumps economic policy has been an utter disaster in comparison.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 hours ago

              i’m talking about the voter base that actually cares enough to influence their vote over it.

              https://www.imeupolicyproject.org/postelection-polling

              bro, did you see ANYTHING that trump said? Literally an irrelevant argument.

              Don’t move the goalposts. Here’s what you said:

              she was actually pretty ok? The one thing that was bad about her was the israel stance, which is like maybe 5% of the voter base that ACTUALLY cares about that enough.

              We’re talking about Harris on her own merit, not about Trump.

              I remember her talking about a lot of things she and walz were going to do, that was like a pretty big deal.

              Like? Give me something specific she clearly said she would do for the working class and a link of her saying it in September or October.

              yeah and? Biden had pretty good economic policy? Aside from the whole covid thing, but you have no choice there, unless you want a global recession, more like a depression.

              He did well on the economic recovery front, but he or example didn’t go after price gouging. His economic policies were a step in the right direction, not an end state to campaign on.

              Again, trumps economic policy has been an utter disaster in comparison.

              Again, that is literally not what we’re talking about.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I blame the voters.

      It means you never have to listen or change in any way, so of course you do.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        LOL, I am a voter. Are you under the impression that I have any direct influence over the Democratic Party? 🤣

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          LOL, I am a voter. Are you under the impression that I have any direct influence over the Democratic Party?

          According to your comment, voters are to blame, not the infallible holy party. So good work electing trump. It’s all your fault.

    • LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You’re being mean to me! I hate you mean liberals! You’re always picking on leftists who just want to let fascists become president

    • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Defeated Democratic candidate: accepts responsibility in the lightest possible way

      Liberal fanboy: Noooo, it’s not your fault, it’s the children who were wrong!

    • GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Any ADULT can easily see that politicians are going to be imperfect

      The best I can do is fall for blatant Russian propaganda and then get mad when someone calls me out on it.

      • Formfiller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Sure as opposed to the totally stable and sane politics of today🙄. The establishment neoliberals aren’t popular . It’s just a fact

  • MisterOwl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    142
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Nope. This is on Biden. It’s his fault Harris/Walz were put into an impossible situation.

    That senile old fuck was supposed to be a one-term president. If they’d spent 4 years planning for 2024 instead of sitting around with their thumbs up their asses maybe they could have run a winning campaign.

    But no, Joe was too proud or stupid or both to stick to that plan. This election was lost the instant he doddered his way on to the debate stage on 6/27/24.

    • The Giant Korean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Lots and lots of balls were dropped. Garland didn’t get Trump in jail when he could have. Biden didn’t stick to only one term. A democratic candidate wasn’t really elected when Biden stepped down (for the record, I think that Harris was more than qualified, but a lot of people were upset that she was just “chosen”). Harris didn’t try to stand out and be her own candidate - she mostly just stuck with the status quo and never disagreed with Biden. Etc etc etc.

      • ExistentialKiwi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Warning bells started going off in my head the moment that the Democrats announced that Harris was going to be the candidate after Biden dropped out, not because I thought she was an unqualified candidate but because there was no time taken to search for other candidates. Maybe it was too close to the election to take the time to go through the rigamarole of all that but I think even a cursory effort to do so would have gone a long way towards making it feel like people’s opinions actually mattered. Biden dropping out was huge (at least to me) because it felt like an acknowledgement of the voters who had consistently felt like they were held hostage for their votes because the alternative was a fascist.

        It doesn’t help either that they went on to repeatedly shoot themselves in the feet while chasing moderate Republican votes, getting other prominent Democrats to chastise certain classes of voters and breeding the same voter apathy that hurt them in 2016, and their refusal to acknowledge that what’s happening in Gaza is a genocide that we shouldn’t help Israel perpetrate.

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It’s also the campaign money, only goes to Harris, and not anyone else. They are legally required to return all that fundraising to the donors if they use a different candidate

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Maybe it was too close to the election to take the time to go through the rigamarole of all that but I think even a cursory effort to do so would have gone a long way towards making it feel like people’s opinions actually mattered.

          it was way too close for that, by the time you had found one, you would be weeks, if not one or two months prior to the election, with no VP, and only a candidate, you would’ve had to have started the primary at the time it normally does to pull that off, they took a gamble, and that gamble was that biden would ride it out, and im not really sure why they took that gamble, but they did, and they lost.

        • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Yeah, the moment I knew we were in trouble was when they publicized that video of Obama lecturing down to some black men about not supporting Harris enough. Whoever thought staging that was a good idea needs to retire from politics forever and go find a field to stand in.

        • FilthyHookerSpit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          On your last point, I don’t think Dems could’ve done anything different. They’re clearly in Israel pockets and they can’t disobey their corporate overlords and run on a more progressive agenda. Only other option was to try hard to get the “centrists”. Incredibly disappointing as they would rather lose and go hard fascist rather than let their donors lose any money (how’s that stock market looking?).

      • NotLemming@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Putting trump in jail would’ve made America look bad. Oh, the irony.

      • ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The Oligarchy will never convict one of their own. For four years, I said it was the dog and pony show. And in the end, nothing will happen to Trump. Here we are.

      • kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        55
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Exactly, and it’s the third time we’ve been betrayed like this.

        Not going after the Bush administration.

        Not going after the subprime mortgage architects.

        Not going after Trump.

        Three times, they’ve had the easiest of layups for public approval of all time and they’ve consistently fucked it up.

        • NotLemming@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          It’s not really a fuck up when they did it deliberately. Their priorities are in the wrong place because it’s an oligarchy.

          • bishbosh@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Seeing liberal’s repeatedly stumble in stopping anyone to the right, but having the fangs come out the moment they need to protect themselves from the left really shows that it’s not failure, it’s refusal.

            • NotLemming@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              14 hours ago

              I see the same from the left though. Great criticism… of other leftists. Then defending authoritarian shitholes with dictators, like Russia. Makes no sense to me, it’s just tribalism.

              • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                10 hours ago

                That’s a false dichotomy. There are more political ideologies left of center than status quo liberalism and tankism. Most leftists are very much critical of Russia, because it’s an imperialist capitalist dictatorship.

                • NotLemming@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  I hope so! I mean the left should be united against Russia but that’s not what I’m seeing, sadly.

              • bishbosh@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                14 hours ago

                Are you comparing the political actions of the only ostensibly anti-fascist party in the US to the leftist infighting of posters online? Try organizing with leftists outside and you might be able to see the difference.

                • NotLemming@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  It’s kinda difficult to criticise those in power from the left when there aren’t any. Is there even 1 communist politician in th UK or america?

                  People, including us now, talk online and share their views. I’m sure the same would play out in person as it does online. Maybe luckily, some political ideologies seem to ban any criticism by banning anyone from their spaces who aren’t on board with their agenda. So that at least saves on talking to people who aren’t interested in talking to others, only pushing their propaganda.

        • stroz@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          I’d like to add:

          Not going after the Confederate states

          to this list

      • Pumpkin Escobar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Amen. 4 years to build a case? January 6th, spend 6-12 months and file charges. What the fuck were they doing for 4 years?

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Or at least the second the supreme court said whatever the president does is legal as long as it’s an “official act”.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Harris made choices. She could have chosen not to adopt every single one of Bidens policies. What was biden going to do, fire her? If you look back at her presidential run she really struggled to articulate any policies back then too.

      • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        What was biden going to do, fire her

        If the reports are true, yes that seems to be the case. I’m not really sure what would have happened, but she was absolutely threatened into defending Biden’s legacy.

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 hours ago

          The president cannot fire the vice president.
          The best a president can do is lock the VP out of meetings. Bidens approval ratings were so low, being locked out of meetings would have cost her nothing. So exactly what reports are you quoting here, lets see them. I think you made that up.

          • 0ops@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Bidens approval ratings were so low, being locked out of meetings would have cost her nothing.

            Hell, if that happened and we assumed that anti-establishment sentiment is what got trump elected, maybe she could’ve capitalized on that to win the election as a “new” type of politician, one willing to go against the Democrat establishment whom literally everybody hates and dig up the potential dem voters who haven’t had hope for change since Obama. Of course, this is Kamala Harris we’re talking about, probably one of the last politicians that I’d expect to pull a move like that.

    • Kalon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      A cascade of failures. Beyond Joe not man enough GTFO, the DNC once again anointed a letter instead of letting the public decide. yes, Joe should never have run for a second term. Given that he did, he should have dropped out sooner. Given that he didn’t, the DNC should have had an open convention rather than putting their thumbs on the scale in back room deals.

      Tim is 100% right that we would not be in this mess if they had won, but when is the DNC going to stop trying to manipulate everything and lie to us about it? They are to blame as much as Repugnacans.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Because they and R are same team. I bet it’s like lawyers who viciously go after each other in court, them have golf and martinis on weekends.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      This is on anyone who was within arms reach of Trump in the last decade and didn’t take matters into their own hands.

      • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Yeah a bunch of people want to make excuses for 90 million people who just… Didn’t think it was important who won.

        Campaign was flawed but if people showed up to vote against fascism we wouldn’t be here. And there’s zero excuse for all 90 million of them to not show up.

        Edit- well, Im reading your post in a different light but, yes that too.

    • Xanza@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Biden made an appropriate decision to back out. He should have done it much sooner. But I’m not sure I would characterize the failings of Harris/Walz as Biden’s fault. I don’t really feel that’s fair.

      Harris’ main draw was that she didn’t want to do anything, which pissed off progressives. She was pro-establishment and pro-status quo. She didn’t need Biden’s help to not get votes… I have no love for Biden, but the truth is the truth.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        But I’m not sure I would characterize the failings of Harris/Walz as Biden’s fault.

        Inasmuch as they ran as a continuation of his policy, I’d say there’s some blame to be had.

        • Xanza@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          So you’re saying that two adults chose to run an unpopular and non-working Biden “plan” which was proven to not work, and that’s also Bidens fault because two completely unrelated people decided to also use that plan?

          Does your brain not work?

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                If biden hadn’t been such a mildewy dishrag of a president, his VP might have won. Now insult me more since it’s all centrists do when people expect better of them.

                • Xanza@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  And again this is about you hating Biden. Which is fine, hate him. But how long are you going to blame everything on him like a petulant child?

                  Next week when you stub your toe you’re going to blame him?

                  His Vice President chose to run for office. She chose the platform that she chose to run with. It wasn’t Joe Biden’s platform it wasn’t even loosely tangential to Joe Biden’s platform. But it’s his fault in your eyes because you feel that she stole his platform…

                  Go back and reread my anecdote about the police. You made it even more relevant.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Walz emphasized Democrats must offer something better, not just criticize Trump.

      Biden shares a lot of the responsibility, but Harris and Walz were running on fundamentally faulty assumptions.

    • NotLemming@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They probably realised Harris wasn’t going to win due to the amount of prejudice and thought Biden had a better chance against trump (who they’d have guessed would have been axed after his loss and criminality, but it was a cult), but then they let Biden to abdicate because there was truth in the criticism of him and the media ran with it…

      At that point who else could they run? It was bad planning, not accounting for Biden’s age/health and the cult of trump.

      Also they should have given Bernie his shot. They didn’t want real change and it’s been forced on them anyway, but now to the detriment of all.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I already had some respect for Walz, and it has now grown by leaps and bounds. While much of the messaging from the democrats seems to contain some level of voter or constituent blaming, Walz is out there taking responsibility.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    168
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    “I think Americans have had it,” Walz explained. ”… Look, I own this. We wouldn’t be in this mess if we’d have won the election ― and we didn’t.”

    Good to see someone from the campaign acknowledge “getting votes” was the campaign’s entire job, and losing the election is the fault of the campaign.

    I hope Walz runs in a competitive primary and gets the nomination.

    But if they try to just hand a baton off, we’re gonna see the same result.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      NO! NO! NO!

      NOOOOOOO!

      Do not nominate Tim Walz you stupid assholes. He was the blue republican addon to make the progressive Harris campaign appeal to centrists and republicans. He wanted to “expand israel’s borders”. He was elected in a district that ran straight red like the blood of the innocence for a long time before he won it, and then he lost that district during the election.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        He was the blue republican addon to make the progressive Harris campaign appeal to centrists and republicans.

        The what Harris campaign?

        • Stern@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          47
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I feel like if Biden had stuck with something like, “I’m going to be one term and let some younger folks lead, we need some folks who are going to see the consequences of their actions running the show, not 70 and 80 year olds.” and had an actual primary, Harris wouldn’t have been the nominee and said nominee would have won. There’s a few other things that could have helped, but the short campaign was definitely a huge stumbling block.

          • Yeather@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I’ve seen people argue Biden and Jamie Harrison had a following out, and that Biden never really planned to run again, he just wanted to spoil the primary and push a very unpopular Harris onto the ticket.

          • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Yes indeed, but also primaries can help to attract voters. I think the Sanders campaigns, though he didn’t win, made young people more likely to vote Democrat.

        • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          20 hours ago

          We did, in fact, have primaries. There were like 9 choices for the Democratic nominee in my state. Better challengers could have run but didn’t. Yes I know the DNC using funding to “encourage” or “discourage” but that doesn’t change the fact that challengers could have, and did, run in the primaries.

            • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              18 hours ago

              That is partially true. We the voters did not vote for Harris, but the Biden delegates who the primary voters sent to the convention did.

              • CarnivorousCouch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                17 hours ago

                Yeah, and Biden was old. Even before his obvious deterioration, there was always a chance he wouldn’t make it through the term and Kamala would have to step up. If you voted for Biden in the primaries and were NOT ready for a potential future of a Harris presidency, I don’t know what you were thinking.

            • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Your proof that we didn’t have primaries is to link a source that shows that not only did 48 states have a primary (I wasn’t aware that Florida and Delaware did not, so TIL, and thank you for that), but also that all of them had at least one challenger on the ballot? Show me who qualified to be on the primary ballot in their state, showed up to register for it, and was denied.

              • davidgro@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                17 hours ago

                I’m not who posted it, but that list is either wrong or varies by county. My state is listed with a couple other candidates in various colors including green, but my actual primary ballot was Biden or nobody. (Or Trump or nobody). I just recycled it.

                • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  That sucks. Was there anybody who met the requirements and tried to register but was rejected?

          • Stern@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            Primaries are kind of a moot point for the incumbent if they want to run again.

            Trump in 2020 had 2,549 delegates. The next closest was Bill Weld with 1.
            Biden in 2024 had 3,905 delegates. The next closest was uncommitted with 37.
            Obama in 2012 had 3,514 delegates. The next closest there was also uncommitted, with 72.
            Bush in 2004 had a clean delegate sweep of 2,509.

            • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Yep. But it’s generally (just learned that Florida and Delaware Democratic parties cancelled theirs in 2024) not because the state parties just reject any other names to be put on the primary ballot. But there’s still a lot of people saying there was no primary or that the DNC wouldn’t let any challengers run. Just generally misplaced anger that they didn’t have better Presidential candidates to vote for when the reality is that better people just chose not to run. Has there ever been a primary challenger beat the incumbent president for the nomination and then win the election?

              • Stern@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                17 hours ago

                Has there ever been a primary challenger beat the incumbent president for the nomination and then win the election?

                There’d have to be a primary challenger who beat the incumbent first, and I don’t think that one has happened. I know Ted Kennedy got relatively close (Well, closer then the others I’ve mentioned, still blown out 1900 to 1200 delegates) to knocking out Carter on the Dem side, other then that, Reagan and Ford in 1976 was decided 1,121 to 1078 for Ford.

      • ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Nope, because the majority of the people that are in these comments in this post and in several others that are acknowledging that the Democrats fucked up will start punching left again in about three years. And they will repeat their failures from 2016 2020 2024.