“Profoundly negrous” is fucking crazy man.
Right, and he’s so comfortable with this language. He’s well into living on another planet where phrases like this are common place among his group.
Honestly, there’s no real decoding this. There’s no hidden messages or trying to see the underlying logic.
I’m guessing they’ve either got a little cult where they’ve given specific meaning to this little phrase, or it’s just as dumb as it sounds and makes no sense.
I’m guessing it makes no sense on account of the it not making sense.
chat is this satire
I thought he meant naggers.
I… what does that even mean?
No idea. I do think billionaires are a serious problem and shouldn’t be allowed. Dont care how many business they start. They have the power to buy elections and play games with our entire world so fuck em.
He is a racial narcissist (and racial fascist) who has narcissistic delusions about race that are his projections of his own insecurity. He gets narcissistic supply from people responding to his delusions as if they are real. Which is why narcissists crave proximity and control so much and are fascists, because their biggest goal in life is to cater and caretake their delusions, not to actually think or do things or be progressive. It’s about the appearance of those things because it was always about narcissistic supply in the first place.
Most white men who are racial narcissists believe in:
- physical narcissism, which they believe black men are superior to them due to eugenics from chattel slavery, including a belief that they are stronger, their dicks are better and they are better at sex (this is a REALLY big deal to them, more than you would realize). This is also why white supremacists wanted to EAT and DID EAT black slaves. It’s also why they have to push narratives that black people are ugly, phrenology, etc. It’s why they are so physically cruel to them - they overabuse them because they are physically insecure.
- intellectual narcissism, which they believe they are superior to black people because of chattel slavery/owning them (aka sadistic and psychopathic abuse, not intellect) and the various white supremacy lies. This is why they don’t like DEI. Again, remember this is projection- it’s their own deepest insecurities they vomit out constantly through delusions.
Then these delusions can be applied to others not even in that group, because it was never based on reality to begin with. That’s why he’s calling white people the n word, he simply wants supply and it doesn’t matter if what he says makes sense or is rational.
Tldr; Curtis Yarvin believes his own dick is small, he is bad in bed, he is weak, and he is stupid and a bad rich person who made his money like all very rich people - via slavery and theft.
Fascinating. I never understood why the cuckolding fetish (fixation? obsession?) came with such a strong overlap with, I guess, race play? Feels like a charitable way to put it.
I didn’t believe it at first, but any quick web search will show that cuckolding largely is about the races of the people involved.
Which makes a lot more sense if seen through the framework you just described.
There’s also overlap with power narcissism (“might makes right”, nearly always ties in to physical narcissism and intellectual narcissism), money narcissism (classism), gender narcissism (misogyny), and savior narcissism (the stuff you see in charities and churches, evangelicalism).
And more ofc. There’s no limit to delusions someone can have.
All of that overlaps because there is intersectionality of narcissitic abusers, who then look for victims who safisfy that. We focus a lot of intersectionality of victims and not their abusers. But it’s why Ted Bundy picked young white attractive college girls with long straight dark hair to attack - all of those aspects represent his own narcissistic delusions, they are not the fault or problem of the victim, but of the abuser projecting onto the victim. They look for perfect dolls or teddy bears to project onto. Ted Bundy was otherwise perfectly safe to Anne Rice and most people he encountered because she wasn’t someone he could fully project onto - his narcissistic delusion enforcement wasn’t triggered by her.
So for eg it isn’t so much that Native American women are more likely to be murdered because they are Native women, but that there’s a widespread narcissistic belief set that murdering Native American women is not a concern, so much so that police and media and much of the public ignore it or actively aid it. And now we see this issue magnifying with the deportations - where are all the women? Latinos are just Native Americans who were colonized by Spanish speakers, after all.
But when we focus on abusers instead of the abused, the abusers realize they will get cut off from supply and they have a huge pushback for control.
And yeah it all ties into sexual stuff too
Never really thought of narcissisms in such a plural and mundane way. Is this a school of abnormal psychology or something?
Interesting lens to look through. I’ve always been a sucker for this kind of transactional analysis.
There is something called “collective narcissism,” and a lot of this info is in various studies and works. Here’s one study about gender narcissism: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11199-020-01193-3
Sure, yeah, but none of that explains what billionaires being “negrous” means? Like something something connect them with the same negative attributes that they keep going on about?
Can white billionaires be “negrous”?
Read again:
Then these delusions can be applied to others not even in that group, because it was never based on reality to begin with. That’s why he’s calling white people the n word, he simply wants supply and it doesn’t matter if what he says makes sense or is rational.
I know I’m an idiot, but I actually still don’t understand it.
So there is no black people, that are billionaires. So that is not a problem. But he wants there to be a problem. So he just says that they act black. Which is a problem.
?
His hatred of blackness is based on a delusion, an unreality, a false narrative. Therefore, it doesn’t actually need to make sense. He just compulsively uses that narrative to either feel 1) validated, smart, amazing, grandiose or 2) hated, a monster, the biggest victim and villain. He can even flip back and forth between these. These feelings are HIGHLY ADDICTIVE* for them, and it is what they prioritize over EVERYTHING ELSE.
So it isn’t about making sense. It is about feeling grandiose and vulnerable. That’s it. It never had anything to do with black people in the first place, because the narratives he has around them werentreal anyway. It was about picking something he could get supply from.
_*Addictions aren’t really real but for the purpose of this conversation, supply is like an addictive drug
Okay yeah my bad for trying to look for rationality in racism, true enough.
ok I’m going to TRY to explain his thinking but I’m likely going to come off as racist trying to explain it.
What he’s saying is there are those who earned their wealth via hard work and all that other bullshit and others that just got it handed to them or give off the impression that they’re insanely wealthy when “they’re not”.
this is what he likely means when he says “n-word rich”. Because this morons impression of wealth in the Black community is via watching music videos and watching reality TV. He’s watched way too many youtube vids about such and such Black music artist or athlete who wears all this “bling” has all these cars and a huge mansion with nothing in it but meanwhile said person is broke. that’s what he means by “n-word rich”.
he could have just said “The problem is the majority of billionaires aren’t actually billionaires. They just think they are.”
That’s what I thought he was saying at first, but that still doesn’t even make any sense though. You are either a billionaire or you are not. I don’t know of anyone who goes around claiming to be a billionaire when they are not, and I could probably name a few who are but never mention it.
Also why would it be a problem? Is he saying there is not enough of a wealth gap? That’s demonstrably false.
And what’s with the nature and function bit?
Sounds to me he’s just spouting hatred to be provocative without any real point.
Some people like to rebrand the n-word as a non-racial term. Pretending that it is not tied to skin color or racism but behavior.
Removed by mod
Banned from my instance.
Launched from my trebuchet.
There is no mask when you’re already ‘Peter Thiel’s bestie’
The most benevolent reading of his idea here is that the rich are shallow and are content with the base material satisfactions afforded them by wealth, as opposed to using their wealth for some kind of greatness.
That’s it. That’s the whole idea.
So this is the wise sage of the dark enlightenment? This is the intellectual colossus shaping the thinking of the new tech elite?
There is nothing there. Any random village priest (or small town pastor for you yanks) has more intellectual depth in their Sunday sermon than this.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DMLJh0SRz9o/ this is my favourite review of the latest Superman and I believe says it even more directly than the tweet
Omg! this was unexpectedly good!! I almost stopped watching after the first minute thinking it’s another “hollywood movie nerd” talking about imaginary superheros that fly and shoot lazers from their eyes… Then suddenly my guy “the hollywood movie nerd” switched to real mode really quick just before you thought you could sleep on him! This guy! that was awesome!
I thought the movie was ok, but it triggering right wing nutjobs is hilarious.
Black people: “Why am I in this?”
Did he elaborate further on what that means? Seriously, where’s the original tweet? there’s no way nobody ask this racist twat in replies to explain to layman non-philosophers like us what is n-word rich billionares, and what he sees as a problem with his best friends Peter Thiel and Elon Musk? does he mean they they are leeching lazy mutants on society? does he meam they exaggerate or waste their wealth where it should not go? Is he criticizing them or is he actually with classism and billionares but just wants them to get their act together and invest in better things? is that something of the billionare-class shortcomings or does he oppose America’s form of capitilism which lead to their existence?
Of course he meant Nerdier billionaires! Silicon Valley must go!
At what point do we start tagging him with “racist sympathizer Peter Thiel”?
Is there any point in doing that? All these guys are openly racist, anti-democracy and anti-america. Enemies of the state by definition (a state which is almost entierly under their control by now). We’re way beyond calling out on racism.
And all my neighbors are still on board with Trump. Drives me nuts.
En masse, as soon as we can.
How is it that the weirdest dudes keep ending up with so much power and influence. Like, this is just bigoted shit obviously, but it’s weird bigoted shit. What is it about people that makes them look at a weirdo freak (derogatory) like this and think “this is a man I need to have direct the entirety of my belief system going forward”?
Social media has accelerated this. No one would know who this guy was in the 90s, for example.
I have zero idea who he is. Or Thiel for that matter …
Well, they are actively trying to enslave and kill you, so maybe learn
Success is awarded to the confident. You can be an absolute weird idiot and still, in the right circumstances, get massive success just because people assume there’s a reason you seem so confident, and who are they to second guess that confidence?
That’s literally the only reason Trump is where he is. He’s not actually good at anything.
Confidence is often mistaken for competence. I’d like to believe that’s why “con(fidence) men” are ever successful.
I think a part of it is you have to be weird to want to chase power. Normal people aren’t thinking 24/7 about how they can leap frog their way into power
The other part is that normal people as party of a well functioning society need to actively maintain systems that keep fuckwits from accumulation to much power, and we haven’t been doing that.
Then they decide to get makeovers or permanent eyeliner like that’s supposed to make up for all the other weird shit?
Yeah, why can’t they just be a weirdo freak (celebratory) like the rest of us anarchists?
Excuse me?
profoundly negrous
This motherfucker is so racist he invented a new term.
It’s 4chan speak, I’ve seen it before.
You need to hang out in better places.
It’s good to lurk and keep an eye on extremist spaces imho. Not good for the mental health, but helpful in intervening/deradicalizing teenagers following down those rabbit holes. Good to also prep counters and debunks to narratives before they take hold.
Like Reddit! /s
While I can understand his syntax, I fail to understand the substance of that sentence.
Now I’m curious how wealth can be utilized in a manner that pertains to African-Americans. Funding sickle cell anemia research?
I think he is basically saying “I think that black people are bad. I also think that some billionaires are bad, but it’s #notallbillionaires . The innate badness that black people have and the bad billionaires have are the same, so I am going to call the bad billionaires black”. In other words, racist bullshit
His “exceptions” are clearly the guy who can’t get through a press conference without rolling on molly (and has dozens of illegitimate children) the guy who talks with a vocal fry and practices “concerned face” in the mirror because he thinks it fools people into thinking he isn’t Patrick Bateman, and the guy who injects the blood of young people and gets stumped when the interviewer asks him if the human race should survive.
So guy 1 is Musk, and guy 3 is Thiel, but who is guy 2?
Altman
N*gga rich is a term used by racists, and co-opted by rappers, to mean getting a small fortune and spending it on flashy ostentatious things.
Oh you mean “new-rich”?
TIL…
I don’t think that’s a neologism. It’s just the adjective to ‘negro’.
Basically he thinks billionaires are ‘behaving black’.
no, it’s not even a word. that wouldn’t even be the adjective to that word.
no, it’s not even a word.
that wouldn’t even be the adjective to that word.
You are right there though. I’m not a native English speaker and thought that would be it. (Sounds like if I’d try to build that adjective in my native language though).
that’s not the word I’m talking about. I’m saying the supposed adjective is not a word. it’s not your fault that you were confused as i said “word” twice referring to different things the Spanish word and the supposed adjective. it’s just that i really don’t want to type any of it so i said “that word” instead not thinking it would be confusing.
You know some csa shithead talked like that.
Removed by mod
A n*gger is a race neutral term nowadays
no. no it’s not. people know its origins and who it’s referring to. to deny this is a form of sealioning. fuck off with that
It essentially means someone that takes far more than they will ever contribute, and in that respect, he’s absolutely correct
attaching this meaning to it is a form of dog whistle to get people to associate these traits with Black people. you are doing the propaganda work of white supremacy right now.
supremaCISM
“White supremacy” is what they think is the case. “White supremacism” is what they practice by thinking it.
Sorry for pedantry but this is one of those things that drives me nuts, similar to “my grandpa is on Facebook with all his conspiracies”. NO. A conspiracy is real. A conspiracy THEORY is when a bunch of idiots think there’s a conspiracy.
Mine is the word entitlement vs false sense of entitlement.
Me: “You are entitled to your social security money.”
Other guy: “I’m not fucking entitled, that money is mine and I want it back.”
Lol
Epstein cover up: Conspiracy - there’s a coordinated and documented effort to stop the information from being revealed to the public
Moon landing doubt: Conspiracy Theory - there’s no evidence of a coordinated suppression of information
Dunno, I once got told that you can use the word if you’re black, LOL =\
And if I’d use it to address a bunch of friends whose ancestors weren’t slaves and who are not black, I think this wouldn’t be an insult. If there’s a black person nearby, I won’t risk it having a different effect though.
Using that word in the way you describe makes you racist and a white supremacist. There are many other words you can call your “friends.”
No it doesn’t. People have all kinds of perceptions of words. Get used to it, nobody is going to follow your whim.
It does. You can choose to use it, and I can call you a racist and white supremacist. All allowed. Natural consequences of being a racist and using racist terms is being hated by normal people and called out. Can’t handle that, maybe stop using and defending the word and use a different one, ya dumb racist coward.
Buddy, you’re not a normal person and nothing in this conversation says I’m a racist.
You’re an idiot.
I don’t know what racist town you’re from, but that is not reality no matter how much racists wish it was. As for a name for people who take more than anyone could ever deserve, we simply call them billionaires.
Woof, you realize that the episode of South Park you morons use to justify this “change in meaning” was satire, and was not meant to be a guide for how to use cognitive dissonance to change words’ meanings to your own liking.
Lmao this chode is really over here trying to ignore all of the cultural context and redefine the n-word, to be able to use it without getting punched in the mouth.
It still has too much meaning, history, and baggage to change so quickly.
peter thiels bestie, was allegedly defenestrated last year, his boytoy , not his husband. also the fact the p2025 and heritage foundation is funded by thiel himself, but the endgame doesnt include “people” like THIEL in thier society.
thiel likes to do things behind the scenes, so he avoids any responsibilities, plus hes gay so he would face much resistance in his policies if he was up and front, like the log cabin people.
