Donald Trump says he “won’t be extorted” by Democrats to reopen the government, making clear that he has no plans to negotiate as the government shutdown will soon enter its sixth week.

In an interview on CBS’s “60 Minutes” that aired on Sunday, Trump said that Democrats who are demanding an extension in health care subsidies “have lost their way” and predicted that they will eventually capitulate to Republicans who have said they won’t negotiate until they vote to reopen the government.

“I think they have to,” Trump said. “And if they don’t vote, it’s their problem.”

Trump’s comments signal that the shutdown could continue to drag on for some time as federal workers, including air traffic controllers, are set to miss additional paychecks and as there is uncertainty over whether 42 million Americans who received federal food aid will be able to access the assistance. Senate Democrats have now voted 13 times against reopening the government, insisting that they need Trump and Republicans to negotiate with them first on an extension of Affordable Care Act subsidies that are set to expire at the end of the year.

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    18 hours ago

    A boomer told me Trump wants the shutdown to be 47 days because he’s the 47th president, and it’s stupid enough I believe it could be possible.

    • SoloCritical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Oh my god. Someone I know that works at a prison told me he thinks he shutdown will end by the middle of November, are you telling me that THIS is the reason why he said that? It’s so bizarre, it’s probably true. SMH.

  • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    If any democrats cave to their Healthcare plans or any other rediculous shit the republicans have planned, I’m not voting for those democrats. The democrats needs to grow some balls, cuz I’m tired of them giving in and chuck Schumer writing strong letters.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    174
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Finish the sentence, buddy. Extorted to do what exactly?

    Oh that’s right, reduce people’s healthcare premiums by 300%

    Edit: just to be completely accurate, premiums have gone up by ~300% because the subsidies ended. Bringing them back will bring that back down.

    • MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It’s really more that they’re trying to “extort” him into not raising premiums. The Democrats aren’t trying to strongarm reduced prices; they’re trying to stop price gouging.

      On a longer timeline, they’re “extorting” him into not killing a few million people. And he’s throwing a temper tantrum and refusing to allow anybody to get in the way of this easily preventable mass death.

      Even if a person is so heartless that they don’t give a shit about that and only cares about money, that’s gonna lead to fewer workers, fewer purchasers of goods and services, and less free time to enjoy purchases. So even the inhuman sludge monsters of capitalism should see that this is gonna be bad for business and be against this. There’s literally zero benefit to doing this if you look beyond the current financial quarter unless your goal is to destroy the country and hurt people.

      It’s like shitting diarrhea all over the birthday cake so it can all be yours, but it’s your own fucking birthday party. The art of the deal.

      • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 day ago

        Unfortunately, capitalism demands that MY employees have no free time, to keep the quarterly numbers up, but everyone else’s employees need to have free time, to spend money.

      • Garbagio@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean the Trump admin and their backers are pretty clearly oligarchic. I would argue that oligarchy is one of the later states of capitalism, but ultimately they don’t care about economic spending; they care about maintaining or further consolidating their monopolies and monopsonies. Amazon doesn’t care that their profits will fall, they care that they are the only middleman between America and the broader world, whether that be through goods or the internet. It doesn’t matter if their workers can’t afford their stuff; the goal is to be the only source, where their workers have no choice but to afford it. “That’s not how economies work!” OK nobody said these people were sane, just that this is what they think.

    • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sorry to be that guy. But they’re not wanting to reduce premiums by 300%. That would make premiums -200% of what they were before. They want to reverse the increase of 300%. Which is actually a reduction of 75%.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Tonight @ 9: Clinical narcissist talks about how something relates to him instead of the 330 million people he represents.

  • Toneswirly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    1 day ago

    1 in 8 people are about to be shunted out of assistance and in to the worst inflated grocery market Ive seen in my lifetime. You know what happens when people are hungey? They get desperate.

      • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think a lot of people here think that riots will be some sort of end game that will remove Trump when it will actually be the next step in his plan to enact martial law and cancel elections.

        • WraithGear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          they do not need an excuse, if they want martial law they will invent a reason like they did the last bunch of times. do not advocate for inaction

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            I agree they will invent a reason. I think this is them inventing a reason. I agree also that it shouldn’t be an argument for inaction. If it doesn’t happen over this it’ll happen over something else. It might as well be this. The more they can do whatever they want the worse things get.

          • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Of course they need an excuse. They may have the house and supreme court in their pocket but there’s still the army and the rest of the world. If they would try to enact martial law out of nowhere the military leadership may simply refuse to enforce it and if they do, other countries will de-invest from US real quick and may even put some sanctions on the government.

            Also, I’m not saying people shouldn’t do anything. I’m just saying consequences of some actions will be different than they imagine.

            • WraithGear@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              the last excuse was some nobody got car jacked, and instituted the lockdown of two cities. they do not need an excuse when they can manufacture one. the military leadership has not stepped in, and when there was a coup, they were also awol from their duties, waiting to see how things shook out. And currently other countries are scrambling to divest from the US real quick. the rest of the world will not help us.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          He is expanding his bunker and is driven everywhere in one of the most armored limos on the planet.

          Add on only doing indoors events (if he does any at all) and, yeah, assassins are pretty controlled.

          Maybe some of the rank and file will get got but nobody cares about them. See: The Future Mrs vance’s dead ex husband.

      • rayyy@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is a big country and millions of people outnumber the few oligarchs. Will he order the US military to kill millions of its citizens?

        • notarobot@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yes. Obviously. Maybe not millions, but dictators usually make an example out ouf a few hundred thousand with such big atrocities that it acts as a deterrent

        • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          No, he’ll order his military to kill a few citizens to make his point that the rule of law is over, and 90% will fall in line. The 10% will become the new “terrorists” that Kash Patel’s FBI hunts and imprisons or kills as continued examples, or he’ll start a war and send them in as fodder.

          He’s trying to be Putin or even Kim Jong Un. He doesn’t need his military to suppress all rebellion, just to protect him from the consequences of his actions while he enjoys the privileges of power. That’s much easier.

        • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          History shows that they are really into killing and raping innocent citizen because a rich guy tells them to. What makes you think they care? A lot of them are even brown, win win

  • blattrules@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh, the guy that half of the voting populace were conned into thinking he’s good at making deals is refusing to make any kind of deal whatsoever?

    • etherphon@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 day ago

      He doesn’t make deals he just cries and threatens people until he gets his way, he’s a fucking hack and I’m really beginning to absolutely abhor anyone who could have possibly voted for this absolute toxic garbage dump of a “person”

      • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        All the trump bumper stickers are looking like some tempting targets these days. If I hadn’t spent the last 8 years getting my life together I’d probably already be in prison.

        • etherphon@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Oh I have, I’m just generally a decent person, I know people get confused, I know there is so much disinformation out there, news agencies you used to be able to trust are pushing propaganda, as much as I want to I really can’t fault people for getting lost in the massive barrage of bullshit. That said, it was clear who this man was a looooong time ago.

      • blattrules@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, he’s never made deals despite him trying label himself a great dealmaker. Anyone that voted for him for his dealmaking prowess hasn’t paid attention for the last 60 or so years. He’s always just used the privilege that he was born into to bully people.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      1 day ago

      Perhaps not. They might have to swear in the new Democrat they’re currently blocking for a month now, which could possibly lead to the release of some iteration of the Epstein files.

    • ExistingConsumingSpace@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is a very common theme in both successful and unsuccessful attempts at totalitarian takeovers. Essentially blaming the opposition for specific issues/events, followed by a crackdown, then a “restructuring” (for managed opposition e.g. Zimbabwe’s Tsvangirai) or completely outlawing the existence of such parties (Greece under Metaxas). I’m very concerned about the near future. If the Republicans (this is bigger than Trump) are successful in their final push for an authoritarian state, it will result in the death and suffering of billions, guaranteed.

        • ExistingConsumingSpace@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Via war and it’s fallout, yes. The disruption to food, safe water, shelter, medical care, etc can increase the death toll well beyond direct casualties. Those are the most immediate effects, which doesn’t take into account the extreme pollution caused by munitions or burning structures/vehicles. All this is also only considering the use of “conventional” weapons.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I too worry about trump bringing horrifying new wars. I don’t quite see it as inevitable though

        • Jännät@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Something like a nuclear war would qualify, although I wouldn’t call that a “guaranteed” outcome.

    • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Sure it will. Economic fallout from no govt money being spent and also air travel being seriously curtailed due to ATC shortages will open things up really quick, relatively.

    • philophilsaurus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Something something The American Senate will no longer be of any concern to us. I’ve just received word that the Emperor has dissolved the council permanently. The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.

    • Jerkface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      If it messes with Congress’ flights or Thanksgiving plans they’ll open it back up right away. Same as the sequestration bullshit in 2012.