Zohran Mamdani has won the race for New York City mayor, according to Decision Desk HQ, ushering in a new era of progressive politics in the city and reigniting the debate over the Democratic Party’s future.

Mamdani, a 34-year-old democratic socialist, is poised to become the first millennial and first Muslim to lead New York City, after a campaign that pulled off one of the most stunning political upsets in recent memory. He defeated former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who mounted a long-shot independent bid after losing to Mamdani in the Democratic primary, and Republican Curtis Sliwa in his bid to succeed Mayor Eric Adams.

Mamdani focused heavily on affordability, pledging to freeze rent, establish city-owned grocery stores and make buses free for riders. He quickly became a progressive icon as well as a polarizing figure within the party over his positions, so much so that it divided prominent New York Democratic leadership over whether to endorse him.

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    44 minutes ago

    The Empire will strike back folks. Brace yourselves and don’t self-congratulate too much, the real fight starts now. Good luck, American friends!

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      33 minutes ago

      The moment anyone so much as an atom left of center is elected, all the forces and money of the nations ruling class bears down on them to prevent even a baby step of progress.

  • merdaverse@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    4 hours ago

    A win for the people! Cuomo’s campaign expenses were $56 million, 2.5 times higher than Mamdani’s. Cuomo was mostly funded by billionaires, while Mamdani had mostly small sum contributions.

    Why are capitalists so bad at investments?? Weren’t they supposed to be the smart entrepreneurs?

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Why are capitalists so bad at investments?

      Because it’s actually worked. The wealthy have become outrageously more wealthy in the last several decades because of their interference in elections.

      Mamdani is a setback for their plans, but honestly 56 million dollars is effectively nothing compared to the money the elite, donor-class holds and uses to influence society. The only way we topple their stranglehold is to have more “Mamdani Events” in every major city and state while we still have democracy and can launch grass-roots elections to remove corruption and money from politics.

    • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Historically and even now, it works. The ones who spend the most, gets the air time, and the George Carlin Americans eat it up and form their opinions after “doing their research” which is nothing but watching TV and facebook from other people who are George Carlin Americans.

      It’s super effective and that amount of money where looking at is chump change to these guys.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The funniest part is that I never, at least from the clips, got the idea that George Carlin was a conservative but he did always have an air about him that I think made conservatives believe he wasn’t talking about them.

        Now, I’m sure this will prompt me learning some things about Carlin but hey, I’m open to that too.

      • immutable@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Don’t worry. There is a small army of well paid McKinsey consultants right now reassuring the DNC that while economic populism won for Mamdani it would never work outside of New York. They will tell the ghouls bought and paid for by big money donors that yesterday wasn’t a complete loss, Liz Cheney could get some sympathy votes on the ticket if the DNC is just brave enough to make her the VP nom and pivot to the center.

    • 鳳凰院 凶真 (Hououin Kyouma)@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      31 minutes ago

      Tbh, that name doesn’t exactly sound that “scary”. Its not really a name that sounds stereotypically “muslim”. If he were arab/from the “middle east”, then someone would’ve used a photo of him next to a bunch of arabic writing and that would actually be a more damaging propaganda. I don’t think Uganda evoke that sort of phobia, I don’t think most people even have an image of Uganda, its just neutral.

      • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        28 minutes ago

        The people who take offense from foreign names don’t stop to consider where the name is from, only that it’s not “'murican”

        • I have a Pinyin Name (romanized from Chinese) and like I always feel so awkward when people ask for my name because I know they can’t literally pronounce it in the original tonal language, its weirder when teachers keep asking me how to say it and idk how to properly answer that since I know its impossible for them (its not done maliciously, I’m sure they’re trying learn, but it just puts me on the spotlight and makes me nervous).

          I doubt I could ever run for office under my current name, nobody would be abke to pronounce my name, and I’d get labeled a “communist” immediately since I was born in mainland China.

          So I could kinda relate to Mamdani in a way. Its nice to see a foreign-born person being elected.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    It is crazy what giving people to vote for something instead just against someone can do. Mamdani had to take on a class on billionaires and the old DNC leadership he who didn’t want to back him. It is funny af to see Chuck the leader of Dems show vote blue no matter who was fake. He most likely voted for Cuomo.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      “It’s crazy what giving people something to cote for versus just something to vote against can do.”

      I agree with your sentiment it’s just the sentence broke me.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Think of a comparison between Trump and Bernie and the take away is that Bernie is the unelectable one…

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Trump seems pretty checked out lately, as expected for someone at the very end of the effective human lifespan who already has everything and anything he wants.

      I would just love to be a fly on the wall to witness Stephen Miller’s implosion right now. He’s the sack of maggots and feces wrapped in human skin who has been effectively running the country for the last year or so because he has no qualms about taking Trump to the hilt and has earned the old man’s trust that way. He has no power on his own because he’s not liked and can’t capture even a shred of political capital like Trump has, on some level he knows when this whole thing folds he will be completely shut out of politics and may even face prosecution.

      Seeing something Mamdani happen, as well as the blue wave that just crashed over major cities and states yesterday, is a reminder that his clock is ticking and running out faster than he would have liked. Expect to see some wild missteps from the administration over the next several months as Miller goes on an absolute bender and tries to accelerate all his half-baked nazi plans.

  • ThePuy@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    My country’s (very politically aligned) public news station described Mamdani as “communist” and “anti-Semitic”.

    I am always a bit disgusted by Italian public service news station, this one was particularly telling at how biased it can be.

  • quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Mamdani also faced scrutiny over his past comments criticizing the police and calling for it to be defunded, though he later issued a public apology to the New York Police Department during a Fox News interview.

    Wtf

  • quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Kinda expected. He was the only good option

    This is what happens when you have rank choice voting. A democracy where progressive win.

    • Unbecredible@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      NYC has rank choice??

      Anyone know if Cuomo would have won without ranked choice? That’s possible to tell right, by just counting up first picks?

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        NYC had ranked choice in the primaries, but honestly I don’t think it mattered this time because as far as I could tell, Mamdani was the only vaguely credible candidate from the onset. The field was otherwise pretty broken by the Eric Adams mess and Cuomo trying to stage a political comeback despite being at his best times merely an ‘acceptable’ politician and then suffering scandal.

      • frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Mamdani also won a plurality of the total votes so even by FPTP standards Mamdani won.

        I 100% agree though that having a Ranked Choice style ballot opened up the door for someone like Mamdani though and would do the same for other progressives.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 minutes ago

          I think the argument would be that the voter strategy changes and they vote their preference more confidently instead of going all prisoner’s dilemma and trying to vote the person that other people will vote for that is most acceptable. So a large volume of people vote for their second choice and never express their true preference in a FPTP system.

          However, I do think he would have carried a FPTP system as well, the other candidates were all pretty terrible, and everyone 100% knew the Republican candidate was never going to matter so they didn’t even have to sweat the ‘who can pull the center’ thinking.

  • Getitupinyerstuffin'@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Whatever happens, everything he does, whether objectively good or bad is going to be both, praised and criticized. there will be sensationlist headlines and lies for both sides, and it’ll force us to dig deeper every time to find out the real truth. Conclusions will be made about his decisions before any results are even seen, do dont be quick to judge. I think we will need to really wait before we see how his policies really affect everything… thats all to say, god bless mamdani and his decision making ability, and bless those around him supporting him. Amen

    • DetectiveNo64@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You won’t see “both sides”, the billionaires own 99% of politicians and media in the US, it’s all from their perspective.

      • Getitupinyerstuffin'@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        If youre not seeing both sides, open your eyes a bit wider. And dont start assuming the party you like is more trustworthy than the other. Im pretty sure its lying politicians all the way up and all around. Its unfortunate human behavior that we like to put people on pedestals when they certainly dont deserve it…

        About your comment though, more people need critical thinking when consider the original source of information.

  • WhatThaFudge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The first thing my conservative acquaintance wrote was “I hope you re ready for another 9-11” because now its coming" They are really scared eh

      • WhatThaFudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        That would be because of photos with the Imam Siraj Wahhaj… Who according to conservatives was organizer of the 1993 wtc bombing… but was not indicted or convicted of anything related to it.

    • Marthirial@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      So in conservative brain damaged logic, Giuliani was a Muslim, Socialist Democrat somehow responsible for 9/11.

      You need better acquaintances.

      • WhatThaFudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        This was my comparable train of thought… Giuliana was elected so 9-11 could happen! He is fully responsible no? /s

    • keyez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yet conservatives get mad about Kirk jokes and wonder why they get kicked off platforms.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Because thats what adults do, they are capable of communicating and being near people with different values and opinions.

        • MisterOwl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          4 hours ago

          “if there’s a Nazi at the table and 10 other people sitting there talking to him, you got a table with 11 Nazis.”

          The “acquaintance” needs a punch in the fucking face and a goodbye.

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            4 hours ago

            You do realize that having witty quotes doesnt change anything right? It might be rhetorically effective at face value, but there is no value other than hate at display here.

              • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 minutes ago

                Not every conservative is a MAGA cultist nor a nazi, it’s ok to have friends and acquaintances with different political views and belief systems from yourself. You’re doing the “everyone I disagree with is a nazi” thing.

        • blackwateropeth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Demonizing people “not like us” is exactly how we got Trump. Not every conservative is a racist monster, most of them are just confused, or heavily gaslit from years of Fox News style propaganda. I’ve personally got a few of my conservative friends and family to see the problems with Donnie Cheeto and openly rebuke his decision making. “Punching someone in the face” for making a poor choice isn’t going to do shit for us when shit gets real, changing their minds will. Not saying everyone on that side of the fence is clear, and I sure as hell hope people complicit with these horrific ice raids etc get locked the fuck up for a long time. Same with all of trumps lap dogs.

      • WhatThaFudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        You shouldn’t exclude people from your circles for different political views.

        How are you going to reach them and get some sense back into their boggled minds if you distance yourself only?

  • Bluewing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It’s one thing to win a battle. It’s another to govern.

    It remains to be seen if he can forge an alliance to govern the city.